>>26928I'm just sick of your shit as well as the general end/pol/ mindset here making huge generalizations and can't objectively argue about many things. There's so much BS in your logic here that I'm actually regretting making this thread.
The arguments that I've seen and used here also had been "debunked" in that Imgur gallery, many of the information in it is actually undeniable like the reality that Nazi Germany had Mohammedans within their army and other stuff. Here's a section of the bottom of that gallery:
How to become a holocaust denier in 10 easy steps
Step 1) Arrive at a preconceived notion (the holocaust, as it is defined in terms of death toll, intent, and methods including homicidal gas chambers, never happened) based on personal beliefs (the world is run by Jews) and then proceed to cherry-pick anything that supports your conclusion while ignoring everything that doesn't.
Step 2) Proceed to dismiss all testimonial evidence historians rely on with a casual hand-wave (or apply the 'poisoning the well' fallacy to point some contradictions as proof of lying), or only go so far as saying if it's a victim, he is a paid shill, and if it's a perpetrator, he was tortured, or accuse either party of insanity.
Step 3) Proceed to dismiss all documentary evidence as forgery, without bothering to specify who forged it and when and how, or concoct an innocuous explanation ignoring other documents and testimonies that give context and what we call a convergence of evidence.
Step 4) Proceed to dismiss all photographic evidence in the same manner as 3) or blame it (if the corpses are from Western Europe) on typhus or (if the corpses are from Eastern Europe) the Soviets.
Step 5) Proceed to keep emphasizing and exaggerating allied war crimes as much as possible to shift the debate onto a more level playing field, accompanied by Hitler's 'peace offers'. And while you're at it, attribute false quotes to famous people along with it and do not provide source while doing so.
Step 6) Proceed to show every piece of evidence you have where someone was exposed as a fraudster who wanted to make a quick buck off the holocaust, even if 10 out of 10 people exposed this way were novelists and irrelevant to historians, or point out errors in journalism (newspapers) to attack historians.
Step 7) Rely on the flawed and selective arguments of the few scientists on your side to dismiss the empirical knowledge of all other scientists worldwide. Also, use pen names to feign revisionist numbers.
Step 8) Keep changing the subject to bring forth one allegation after another allegation against Jews when you seem to be losing ground on one particular technical aspect of the holocaust you are debating an opponent on. Such as drawing attention to the modern Israeli state today, as well as the current Middle Eastern conflict, or other events like 9/11 or any Jew who has doubted the holocaust or criticized Zionism.
Step 9) Relating to step 8), keep in mind why you're really here: not to debate the feasibility of the holocaust with someone in the know, but rather to recruit unsuspecting laymen lacking the knowledge to debate you, to your cause. E.g. throw the Rudolf report in the face of an average youtuber to silence him.
Step 10) Always keep whining to your opponent about holocaust denial laws in some countries and make sure to evoke George Orwell's 1984 whenever possible to paint yourself as a victim of thought crimes. And the moment he calls you names, point out his ad hominem as proof of you having won the debate.
Congratulations, you are now a holocaust denier!