/operate/ - Endchan Operations

Let us know what's up

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


A plan for cleaning up board bloat Balrog Board owner 08/23/2018 (Thu) 21:58:07 [Preview] No. 9674
I've been considering changing the way endchan handles boards. I think it's obvious at this point that completely free board creation and completely soverign BOs doesn't really work; judging from 8chan you just get a massive graveyard of unused boards with none of the independence people were raving about back in 2014. Basically you get redchanit. On the other hand I think it's self-evident that letting users moderate themselves and have input on board creation is a good idea. I want to see what you guys think about it, but here's what I'm thinking of as a broad-strokes plan right now:

>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
>2. Start compiling a list of boards to keep
>3. Turn off board creation for normal accounts, set up a process for topic splitting (where there's enough traffic for a topic to justify its own board; think /tg/ splitting off of /b/ in the ancient days of 4chan) and refugees from other sites to get their own boards
>4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules
>5. Delete the small and dead boards that didn't make the list from 2, giving plenty of warning so people can archive their favorite threads

I think that this way we'll get some of the promised benefits that the "redchanit" model was supposed to give imageboards (BOs that actually give a shit, a board list that reflects posting activity) and not the bullshit.

NONE OF THIS IS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS IS JUST A TEST BALLOON AT THIS STAGE.

So, what do you guys think? picture unrelated


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 03:17:29 [Preview] No.9675 del
>Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
I keep a ghost board for the specific purpose of giving information to norm­ies without scaring them away. They don't even understand posting.
>"don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected"
Who gets to determine this? The people that get banned for shitposting and then run here crying? We'd become like nobanchan or freech. Generally it would start happening that we couldn't ban anyone for any reason because that means "a shit BO".


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 11:27:00 [Preview] No.9677 del
So do you want to shut down the most important aspect that sets this site apart from every other small IB and brought in 3 of a few still active boards?
Are the empty boards generating some issues?

>>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
Sure there are some boards like /wfsdfajosd/ or whatever that maybe had one or two posts made to test how to delete posts or something but there can also be jokeboards that exist only for the purpose of sending people there like >>>/kitchen/. Even if a board is empty give BO a chance to give his reasoning why the board should stay like in >>9675 case. Say BO of /kitchen/ is long gone and won't give you reply so it goes down and if need be someone just makes it again unless you introduce:
>3. Turn off board creation for normal accounts, set up a process for topic splitting (where there's enough traffic for a topic to justify its own board; think /tg/ splitting off of /b/ in the ancient days of 4chan) and refugees from other sites to get their own boards
So you consider it good that user should moderate themselves but then you effectively throw that out of the window wanting to herd traffic yourself(as admin team) and give board creation as a privilege rather than it being a natural right.

>>4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules
Letting people moderate themselves is good but nod really so you have to do that yourself. I get it that if you were to introduce >3. something like that would be needed but what you're effectively creating here is a basis for a clique like that of Freddit Breddit, only with more legal power.

You know why the site has user issues. It had about a 1000 UIPs willing to jump the ship to get away from IRCwheels when, in a brilliant marketing stunt, IRCwheels buying a domain here was announced. Reputation that's been tarnished takes long to rebuild. Board creation model wasn't why 8gag failed and it's not why this site is not as successful as you might want it to be.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 13:39:19 [Preview] No.9678 del
>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
I think it's a great idea. Usually the 0 user post boards get a ton of cialis botspam and sometimes even CP, as people frequently reported on /operate/ for /draw/. Nobody would miss those types of spam if the boards were deleted.

>4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules
This is also good, /ggrevolt/ almost got fucked by a certain person in less than a day, luckily Odilitime stepped in and took the board away. The damage was done (he already deleted one or more threads) but it was a good thing. This would be a good rule.


Balrog Board owner 08/24/2018 (Fri) 15:45:28 [Preview] No.9681 del
(12.30 KB 401x118 214.jpg)
>>9677
All right, let's do this.

>So do you want to shut down the most important aspect that sets this site apart from every other small IB and brought in 3 of a few still active boards?
You mean every other small IB except for the ones that allow board creation but are even deader than we are?
>Are the empty boards generating some issues?
Pic related. The 500s were happening because the disk on the VPS Sibyl gave us is slow as shit and the memcache was too small to compensate. Removing never-used boards can reduce cache churn from search bots and such poking random boards, which means lynxchan can touch the disk less often. MongoDB also forces a lot of linear scans on the board list which may or may not be accelerated by an index IIRC, so removing boards that have literally never been touched since their creation is good for performance in general. Also, it makes the site look like a ghost town, which makes the site look like yet another dead 8chan wannabe, which drives away traffic.

>Sure there are some boards like /wfsdfajosd/ or whatever that maybe had one or two posts made to test how to delete posts or something but there can also be jokeboards that exist only for the purpose of sending people there like >>>/kitchen/. Even if a board is empty give BO a chance to give his reasoning why the board should stay like in >>9675 case.
This was already part of the plan, if you have a board you want us to keep tell us. Also joke board references work whether or not the board actually exists. Watch this: >>>/anywherebuthere/

>So you consider it good that user should moderate themselves but then you effectively throw that out of the window wanting to herd traffic yourself(as admin team) and give board creation as a privilege rather than it being a natural right.
Assumes facts not in evidence. The primary motivation for this part is that to my knowledge "just make ur own board lol" has had the marketed outcome exactly three times since 2014: /monster/ splitting from /mg/ on 8chan, /am/ splitting from /a/ on 8chan, and /AM/ splitting from /am/ on endchan. The rest of the time the only practical effect it's had is to split an already small userbase into smaller, easily manipulated silos that can be shilled to piecemeal and give shitty mods an easy deflection tactic in the form of "just make ur own board lol." At the same time you have boards like /bane/ that developed their own culture and became their own thing, because they genuinely were something that emerged organically from other boards instead of being a forced meme or half-assed attempt at a community fork. Then you have places like /librejp/ who started out as bunkers and are now here to stay. The idea is to get the good (/librejp/, /bane/, etc) without as much of the bad shit.

>Letting people moderate themselves is good but nod really so you have to do that yourself. I get it that if you were to introduce >3. something like that would be needed but what you're effectively creating here is a basis for a clique like that of Freddit Breddit, only with more legal power.
Assumes facts not in evidence. There isn't an "endchan clique" of buttbuddies ruling things from the shadows, just me and OdiliTime. "Freddit Breddit" was able to get away with the shit he did by hiding behind a veneer of impartiality enabled by the opacity of the claim system, all while claiming that he had no legal power over the process. Fuck that shit. This is going to be upfront and in the open, so people know who to blame and why boards get created. Asking for a board isn't going to be this arduous process, it's going to be "make a thread on the board request board and if there are people who will post on it or you're a refugee from another site who wants to keep the community together you'll get it." You also seem to think that we're going to be tossing BOs out for stupid high school lunchroom reasons when we've never shown the slightest interest in that bullshit. That clause is only there to kick out the Mark Manns and imkampfys.


Balrog Board owner 08/24/2018 (Fri) 15:46:37 [Preview] No.9682 del
(44.34 KB 640x427 1500584262960.jpg)
>>9675
>Who gets to determine this? The people that get banned for shitposting and then run here crying?
No. You'll post a thread on /operate/ and if you give solid reasons and evidence (as opposed to whining) of a sustained pattern of extreme faggotry then the BO gets removed and we ask the posters on the board who should get the job, and whoever has the best argument for getting the job (not whoever wins some popularity contest) gets to be the new BO. This is what redditwheels said he was going to do on 8chan before he sold out, and he actually did it once on 8/tg/ after that board's BO vanished, where it worked out pretty well for all involved.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:07:14 [Preview] No.9683 del
>>9678
I'd say nuke any 0 posts boards that are also up for claims and put an annoucnement up that you're doing it, possibly e-mail bo's that you're doing it too so if they want to save their 0 post board they can by logging in and making a post.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:25:49 [Preview] No.9684 del
>>9683
THIS.

But what really qualifies as a "dead board" ??? Thats my concern. A lot of people claim boards they simply don't like are "dead", so we need some clarification in what "dead" really means. I would hope defining "dead" as in 0 posts for a long, long time - boards that actually are not in use at all and have not been for a year or more. I don't want to take a vacation break for a couple weeks and see a board I posted on wiped out.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:27:57 [Preview] No.9685 del
>>9684
yeah I'd be hesitant to wipe out any boards with any posts but there are definitely 0 post boards that are up for claims.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:28:59 [Preview] No.9686 del
like almost all of page 10 thru all of page 12 for instance


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:53:57 [Preview] No.9687 del
(35.12 KB 1280x720 kikery.jpg)
(108.85 KB 944x425 Jim-the-masonnigger.jpg)
(56.28 KB 512x512 The_Jew_Community.jpg)
>>9682
redditwheels had jewish friends ever since the beginning though. Most of us knew after the exodus to infinite that he'd sell us out eventually. Then he did, to a freemason. Which is why we came here. /pol/ reserves the right to kick out kikes and kike enablers. It's our time honored tradition. As for shit BO being open to interpretation, I hope it won't take simply someone starting a shitstorm, being banned, then coming to /operate/ with a concise argument. There's still an army of /sp/orts monkeys who fucking hate us. They're well aware /news/ is connected.


Balrog Board owner 08/24/2018 (Fri) 16:55:05 [Preview] No.9688 del
>>9684
>I would hope defining "dead" as in 0 posts for a long, long time - boards that actually are not in use at all and have not been for a year or more. I don't want to take a vacation break for a couple weeks and see a board I posted on wiped out.
Exactly this.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 17:56:17 [Preview] No.9689 del
>>9681
>except for the ones that allow board creation but are even deader than we are?
Yes. The differentiating factor between endchan and those boards is that endchan isn't totally dead. Unless I'm missing something you don't have real competition among small IBs that allow for user created boards, when you disable that you'll be against several IBs that have more gravitational pull than endchan does. You might as well throw the towel and fusion-ha with one of them.

>empty boards
Okay nuke'em. I didn't know you didn't have enough computers to handle them. I had fun exploring 8chan's graveyard finding gems like a board with two or three threads full of old 4chan screencaps so things like that, /spoon/ comes to mind, I think should stay but if I understand correctly that's not the aim here.
Joke board looses much of it's humor when you can't actually get to that place but whatever, that's the least important thing.

>to my knowledge "just make ur own board lol" has had the marketed outcome exactly three times since 2014: /monster/ splitting from /mg/ on 8chan, /am/ splitting from /a/ on 8chan, and /AM/ splitting from /am/ on endchan
/intl/ from /int/ on 8chan and /christ/ from /christian/ on 8chan. It almost had it's intended effect also when 400 butthurt nazis got chemo'd away to /polpol/ but the chemo was too shortlived to change things. Oh and /horror/ had a good run if you think about it. Sure there were cases like /vvv/ where it just didn't work out, /ma/ that was a nicely done board but didn't get enough traffic because it wasn't the right place nor time and the stillborn /amr/ but it's still a new system and you have to weight cases that it worked in with cases that it didn't each separately because reasons for flops can get complicated. That and you have to take into consideration how many legit causes for splits there were and those don't seem to happen all that often.
>The rest of the time the only practical effect it's had is to split an already small userbase into smaller, easily manipulated silos that can be shilled to piecemeal and give shitty mods an easy deflection tactic in the form of "just make ur own board lol."
Sorry I honestly don't think I understand what are you talking about in here but let's take a look at the case of /AM/ in more detail. For a time it might've fit that description. Nito panicked, 'leaked' irc logs saying that he's sorry, and most of /am/ got fooled by him and got back under his rule. 3 ch/AM/ps only by the sheer force of their combined autism managed to keep a board alive for several weeks up to a point when Nito saw that things have simmered over and he can start introducing his rulecuckery again. Only then were they proven right and /aM/ got reunited. And don't you tell me admin team was rooting for /AM/ in all of this because even weeks after it was all finished I remember seeing one of you, Odilitime I think, stating that Nito was a good BO.
These are no simple decisions to make and yea 'assummes yadda yadda' but I don't trust you'll make good call in a situation like /am/ /AM/ conflict. I think it's better to have it play out. By no means an ideal system, original board has a lot of advantages as it's the default place where new users go to but even despite that it can work. On the other hand when admin team makes a wrong call it cannot work out anymore.

>Assumes facts not in evidence.
The thing about making a good legislation is to anticipate what could go wrong an provide solutions before that happens. Your line of thought is 'trust us we won't fuck this up' but everyone in your positions around you does in one way or another and you yourselves have fucked up too several times. Why would you even want to micromanage. Why take up that responsibility. I think it's best for admins to be impartial and just deal with having the place running, I'm sure that's enough of work as it is.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 18:10:33 [Preview] No.9690 del
Oh and one more thing.
Splits can happen regardless if board creation is allowed or not but when it isn't you just loose traffic that either goes elsewhere or starts it's own thing. I don't see how that's beneficial.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 18:46:51 [Preview] No.9691 del
Let's start with some theory.

Easy on-demand board creation encourages migration. It's also good for bunker management, which opens the possibility for complete migration at a later date. Any restriction of on-demand creation kills the possibility of getting people to settle here because such opportunities fly past extremely fast. Off the cuff, I'd say a response time to a board creation request of greater than ten minutes and you've lost the edge. Endchan's administration is a good crew, and I have no complaints, but their expected response time to questions and suggestions is about twelve hours. Sometimes more. Of the ways and means of tapping trends among the chanscape, speed is life.

Good theory. Yet, practice paints a different visage.

Take /mlpol/ for an example. I still think 8chan would have been their final resting place had it not been for The April Hack knocking the place offline and out of consideration. Endchan should have been sufficient, but they choose a full site creation instead.

Sportschan is more of an idea than a site, or mere board. Their nomadic ways are amazingly resistant to the perils of migration. They as well decided to roll with the creation of an entirely new site over a simple push to another board. I'm sensing a trend ...

Krautchan's vaporization was the most recent once-in-a-lifetime migration opportunity. Endchan captured a sliver of them, clearly not the whole. I'm not a KCer myself so I didn't give them much study, and I don't know what became of the majority. Did a new KC replacement site take off?

My own experience with attempting a migration dates way back to the Infinity Next fiasco. For the board in question, suffice it to say, it failed. I did gain some valuable insight as to my fellow board users and why they will never migrate from 8chan. More recently, we were the target of a replacement attempt with a newly created board. This crew was conscientious enough to spell out their vision of what the new board was to be. Essentially, this vision was everything I found wrong with our mutual predecessor back on 4chan, and all of why I migrated from 4chan. So, no thanks. After an initial splash, chanting all the while "we shall overcome!" they petered out. I believe they are yet to discover their competition for the glory of mindshare is not with another board, or another site, but with Discord.

Sorry for the TL;DR wandering analysis essay. What would I like? I would like for easy on-demand board creation to remain, and maybe for one silly really-dead-but-not-quite-dead board to survive for its hideously CSSed and obscure softcore p0rn amusement value. However, the site administration is completely justified in looking at what works, and what does not, with one cold clear eye turned to the future.


Anonymous 08/24/2018 (Fri) 23:32:50 [Preview] No.9692 del
I think thats good, but your "Shit BO" clause is a little too vague
something more like "if you drive away sight traffic you will be removed" or the likes. easily quantifiable. if a board has several bans a day they're obviously doing something wrong-- raids aren't something that lasts in perpetuity so if a board is kicking people out every week, for its entire existence then perhaps its not a raid, and a problem with the BO instead
cough cough /pol/ and /news/


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 02:53:20 [Preview] No.9693 del
(145.13 KB 1569x807 35676.jpg)
>>9692
See, these are the faggots against us. This is why your "shit BO" clause won't work. /pol/ and /news/ are doing fine. There haven't been any bans for awhile. When there are, those bans are warranted.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 03:43:33 [Preview] No.9694 del
Yeah that's probably a good idea. It's worth trying at least. I'm just glad endchan is still around.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 05:21:57 [Preview] No.9695 del
>>9692
Toranon here. I watched as many boards died when endchan was glitching with 500 server errors. What do you think happened to sports? A bad BO banned them all? Site glitches destroyed endchan's traffic. You can't blame moderators.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 12:08:51 [Preview] No.9696 del
(28.61 KB 636x344 schizo.jpg)
>>9687
>everyone's out to get me!
take your meds lol


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 12:19:22 [Preview] No.9697 del
>>9693
>PPH: 0
>almost 0 users
<doing fine


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 12:41:37 [Preview] No.9698 del
>>9692
The BO of /news/ does a good job at curtailing spam, perhaps he's a bit strict with enforcing the rules but thats the way the board is and it works just fine. I've never been banned, likely because I don't shitpost gibberish or spam. Simple comments won't get you banned, insulting the BO or posting disturbing pics [as some have done in the past] could.

>>9697
I see posters every day. He might have taken that statistic at 1 or 2 AM in the morning which would explain why no one was posting. I see people posting there all the time during the day.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 15:57:19 [Preview] No.9699 del
(78.83 KB 713x713 903.jpg)
(8.37 KB 1456x39 0.jpg)
>>9696
>durr we're out to get you but you're insane if you say so
>>9695
/sp/orts statistics are this.
>>9697
>durr 3 is equal to 0


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:12:01 [Preview] No.9700 del
>>9698
all you have to do is post something he doesn't like ie something that criticizes far right ideals, hitler, or something that leans left and it will be deleted and banned. it doesn't matter if it's relevant news, if it meets those criteria the BO will ban you for it.
again, other boards dont suffer from spam.. so maybe the problem isn't spam, but the BO.
>>9693
literally every single page of the site logs has /news/ and /pol/ deleting posts or banning users. literally every single day of the logs has this. of the inhabited boards, those are some of the slowest-- yet they make up almost all the log entries. ask yourself why this is.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:16:23 [Preview] No.9701 del
>>9699
considering /sp/ is an abandoned board here now i dont see your point? that seems like a stupid comparison.
i dont think i've ever seen /pol/ above 1pph ever. the only reason it ever seems to get high in the rankings is because one of its users swaps out proxies several times a day. 3 users is actually exactly what i've been saying that boards population has been.
as for /news/, its almost exclusively one person obsessively posting threads, and a couple people making a comment and him replying. its basically a failed board. having a catalog full of threads with ~5 replies isn't a sign of a healthy community.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:35:01 [Preview] No.9702 del
While basic board meta's lossa fun an all, I think it's time we hear some feedback from the admins about the wider site issues being posed before this thread meanders off into a sunset of accusatory angst.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:48:17 [Preview] No.9703 del
>>9702
its too late anon
after that gauntlet was laid down, you already know some multi-paragraph schizo rants are coming. we'll hear all about how JIDF shills, transexuals, and NEETs are secretly campaigning to destroy /pol/ and /news/. all because they want to cover up THE TRUTH!


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:54:04 [Preview] No.9705 del
>>9703
I have EVERY FUCKING THREAD I need archived already. Try pulling it down and the info can be re-posted swiftly with quickness.

Schizo? Schizo!?!? You don't even know what the fuck schizo IS PUNK!!!!!!!!!!


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 18:57:05 [Preview] No.9706 del
>>9701
/news/ is just fine. Don't fuck with it. You don't even want to fuck with that. Trust me.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 21:47:15 [Preview] No.9707 del
>>9703 <--- well look what we have here


This is exactly the concern anons should have about deleting boards. Sooner or later it won't be just dead boards. It will be any boards any administrators don't like or discriminate against. Then it defeats the whole purpose of this website as it is today. Inb4 "it won't happen". It actually could very well happen. And if you think /pol/ and /news/ won't raid other existing boards if/when deleted then you're delusional. The content will just be allocated to the other boards.

If someone wants to delete the 0 post boards, it better be left up the the OWNER of the website - and the OWNER alone.


Anonymous 08/25/2018 (Sat) 22:12:12 [Preview] No.9708 del
I remember balrog posting about getting rid of 0 post boards because it slowed the site down or slowed some kind of maintenance down. I see where they are coming from with locking board creation except it would make an exodus hard for dying chans and other chan boards who would want to move. also you would if you are going that route to make a 4chan clone boards with shit like /fit/ and /k/ that isn't even active.

The fact that he said he is going to give us a chance to archive our threads means its more than empty boards. I think just delete empty boards or boards that have not had a post in like a year or something. Don't destroy active communities.

>>9707
SHould be snakedudes decision. Even though he left apparently but I thought it was just another maintenence thing I am starting to lean towards this post because he shouldn't have said "give them a chance to archive the threads"

>>9688
Ok I see where he is coming from


Balrog Board owner 08/25/2018 (Sat) 22:25:29 [Preview] No.9709 del
(112.88 KB 750x1007 reading this thread.jpeg)
>>9691
Good point. I do have a plan for catching exodus communities, though: there would be a big "moving from somewhere else? start here" sign on the front page and you would be directed to a global board (probably named /exodus/ or something) set aside so that refugees can start moving in right now with a sticky explaining how to board request.

>>9702
Good idea. By "shit BO" I mean a BO that's shit for the board. /pol/ has different expectations from a BO than /co/ does, and their expectations are different from /sp/. It's not going to be a matter of stirring the pot and then crying on /operate/, you have to have a sustained pattern of making your users hate your guts and/or undermining the "purpose" of the board in the mind of the users. Regarding pruning dead boards, I'd say that few people really care about keeping zero-post boards around, but beyond that things are less clear cut. Keep the discourse coming.

>>9707
What the fuck are you talking about?

>>9708
>I see where they are coming from with locking board creation except it would make an exodus hard for dying chans and other chan boards who would want to move
See above regarding an /exodus/ to give incoming communities a place to regroup.
>also you would if you are going that route to make a 4chan clone boards with shit like /fit/ and /k/ that isn't even active
Nope. That doesn't make sense at all.


Balrog Board owner 08/25/2018 (Sat) 22:34:09 [Preview] No.9710 del
>>9709
Elaborating on
>and/or undermining the "purpose" of the board in the mind of the users
I could see BOs trading boards or suchlike if both and the users think it's a good idea, like (as a historical example) moving the owner who killed the original /am/ to a hypothetical /a/ where his views might be better appreciated so a less "rulecucked" BO can take /am/ in the direction the users want it to go. That's what I mean by "purpose."


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 00:12:17 [Preview] No.9711 del
>>9700
>literally every single page of the site logs has /news/ and /pol/ deleting posts or banning users.
Deleting posts, not banning users. I've addressed this bullshit before.
I delete my own posts when typos have completely fucked up the message
As for /pol/ deletions, they're screencapped on >>>/endpolmeta/
Back in the day when there were such mass deletions pieces of shit came to cry on /operate/, that was when at the same time there was asfadfs spammer, then the message copying autopost bot (don't remember? Ask Odilitime) then tranny dick spammer.
>>9701
I have seen /pol/ above 1pph. It was awhile back before all these site bugs began increasing. Different /pol/ posters gained different nicknames, which indicated more than your false claim. /news/ has more than one person posting threads.
You're only trying to spin the narrative.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 00:13:47 [Preview] No.9712 del
Adding to that, as I've said before, neither /pol/ nor /news/ has banned anyone for some time. You start shit, you're definitely going to see it happen.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 04:56:28 [Preview] No.9713 del
>>9711
>3 users
ya.. ok.
that board has one jannie, and a board owner.
so really its 1 user.
1 user.
let that sink in.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 04:58:38 [Preview] No.9714 del
>>9707
having open board creation like this and tons of dormant boards is a bad thing. for chans to actually grow and have a community they have to be curated. anyone who's been on an altchan that has actually blown up knows this.
looking like a ghost town is a turn off to new users. they don't like it. which is why this place has never achieved popularity as an 8chan clone


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 05:02:41 [Preview] No.9715 del
>>9711
>green text
>bold text
>red text
>cap text
careful, don't get too worked up now


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 10:22:43 [Preview] No.9716 del
(8.55 KB 198x255 43576.jpg)
>>9713
G_C and myself are not the same person, and there is more than just us posting. Also, I'm not going to screencap my own typo posts before I delete them. Many times I wake up drowsy and incoherent before coffee.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 14:21:14 [Preview] No.9717 del
>>9709
>What the fuck are you talking about?

I just do not want to see any abuse when it comes to deleting dead boards, thats all. Some anon suggested certain active boards should be deleted claiming they are only used by "ranting schizos" and thats a red flag for abuse. I would hope you agree all active boards should remain as-is (meaning no discrimination of enforcement procedures).

Also, what about the boards like /tv/ that are rarely used but still hold media content? This should be evaluated as well if deleting 0 post boards are enforced. This could end up destroying a lot of great content, bringing about collateral damage.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 16:12:26 [Preview] No.9718 del
>>9717
/tv/ has actual posts though. It doesn't qualify as "0 posts".


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 18:17:44 [Preview] No.9719 del
>>9716
>3 users
<AdolfHitler
<GeorgeCostanza
<NewsPoster
nothing i said contradicted that. the numbers dont lie.
lmao, today its 2 users. truly successful


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 18:50:37 [Preview] No.9720 del
(73.68 KB 1024x1024 87.png)
>>9719
>AdolfHitler GeorgeCostanza NewsPoster
More than one news poster.
>the numbers dont lie
Then you're lying. There are 7 listed on /news/ right now.
>nothing i said contradicted that.
You're fucking retarded.
>>9713
>so really its 1 user.
>1 user.
>let that sink in.
I never said it was successful. As I and another poster on this thread have said, site bugs caused many people to leave. You can continue blaming me all you want. All that makes you is a half-illiterate retard.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 19:06:28 [Preview] No.9721 del
>>9720
for /pol/... you idiot. any dunce could look at the board stats and realize that. and you can't count mods and owners as users lmao
<half literate retard
jesus christ the irony
i've explicitly been speaking of /pol/ yet you're somehow trying to make it seem like i've been talking about /news/


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 19:26:18 [Preview] No.9722 del
(64.69 KB 469x354 Confused-Idiot.jpg)
>>9721
>half literate retard
You're right. You are. Half illiterate is half literate, dipshit.
>i've explicitly been speaking of /pol/ yet you're somehow trying to make it seem like i've been talking about /news/
>>9719
>NewsPoster
>>9701
>as for /news/, its almost exclusively one person obsessively posting threads


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 20:29:59 [Preview] No.9723 del
>>9722
wow you really are illiterate.
newsposter posts on /pol/ also
newsposter is responsible for every new thread on /news/
you're the type of person who kills this sites popularity


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 20:48:02 [Preview] No.9724 del
>>9723
I haven't killed this site's anything. You're the one obsessing over me. Have to say, it's getting pretty old.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 21:04:27 [Preview] No.9725 del
>>9719
Very successful. You don't seem to understand /pol/ or /news/... let me break this down for you and the rest. We don't care for numbers. Numbers do NOT equate "success" to us. What does then? Quality of content. Information flow. Relentless information warfare, exposure of lies, peeling back false failed ideologies, critical thinking, weaponizing distrust to strengthen and inform one another and the viewers. Viewers who are indefinitely more informed than most other board users. News with views. I do not care how many NEET shitposters avoid or insult us. I do however care about threats like censorship and spam.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 21:10:00 [Preview] No.9726 del
>>9724
The information warfare has worked. Notice how all the demons who lurk here have become absolutely obsessed about us, foaming at the mouth wondering when we'll finally drop dead or be prohibited from the website? This is what TRUTH does to demons.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 23:30:46 [Preview] No.9727 del
>>9725
>all this 'quality content'
>nobody ever sees it
ok pal. sounds great.


Anonymous 08/26/2018 (Sun) 23:32:52 [Preview] No.9728 del
its not what views people have. its how they present them. someone can have all the same opinions as you, but if they present themselves like faggots you'd hate them. the opposite is also true.
balrog at some point you'll have to take a stand. you either cut the cancer out and make a community worth having, or remain in the same stagnation you've had for years.


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 05:07:09 [Preview] No.9729 del
(118.53 KB 963x620 yl.jpg)


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 13:56:19 [Preview] No.9730 del
(680.24 KB 3464x2309 5151561s56a1s51a.jpg)
>>9699
>we're out to get you
take your meds schizo lol


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 13:58:39 [Preview] No.9731 del
>>9699
>having amnesia this severe
/sp/ already said they have 0 pph during working hours and that they shitpost in the evenings

you really need to get yourself checked in to a mental asylum. chronic amnesia + schizophrenia are a pretty dangerous combo


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 14:33:56 [Preview] No.9732 del
>>9727
Viewers are not necessarily posters. Some may post every once in a while, but not all viewers have anything to comment on 24/7. Viewship is never ranked either so you don't know how many people are looking at those boards.

But again, quality over quantity. We don't desire shitposts and average viewers KNOW this. If they speak, we expect questions or a intelligent civil conversation.


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 14:39:04 [Preview] No.9733 del
>>9730
You guys (or perhaps a troll) started this whole debate. Either you (or someone like you) brought up the idea to delete /news/ and /pol/ from endchan NOT us! You forced us into responding! Well now you got us responding, so good job. If you don't want us to respond then keep our names out your mouth.


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 16:48:41 [Preview] No.9734 del
(334.66 KB 1456x1305 news.jpg)
(117.87 KB 784x408 hemorrhoids.jpg)
>>9731
>muh /sp/ is still awesome with 0pph and 0normies :(
>>9723
>you're the type of person who kills this site's popularity
Yet I BO /news/. Here's how that's doing.


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 17:24:05 [Preview] No.9735 del
>>9691
>>9709
>I do have a plan for catching exodus communities, though: there would be a big "moving from somewhere else? start here" sign on the front page and you would be directed to a global board ...

OK. This addresses the idea of keeping a door open to migrations. Better than nothing. To see if it works or not will require waiting for the next big happenings, or chan failure, or whatever.

This does not address creating new community boards whole cloth, nor bunkers. Arguably, based on historical observation, this is non issue. If enough people want to start, or reserve a new board for the future they can petition the administration and wait it out. Instant user directed board creation is a feature relevant only to the early days of a freshly launched image-board, perhaps.

My preference remains to retain user board creation, with an added automatic reaper function. Something which auto-deletes a board after a generous period of obvious non-use.

My impression from Endchan's administration is they want to cultivate active user communities, while freeing themselves from having to maintain and police otherwise dead boards. Without someone else to step up and act as a board owner, a dead board is a both a liability risk and a disproportionate sink on system resources. Apparently so for Lynxchan, hosting resources too, I suppose.


Anonymous 08/27/2018 (Mon) 22:54:28 [Preview] No.9738 del
>>9734
>5pph at peak hour
um... congrats??


Anonymous 08/28/2018 (Tue) 00:31:22 [Preview] No.9739 del
pic is always related


Anonymous 08/28/2018 (Tue) 09:25:41 [Preview] No.9743 del
>>9738
<still doesn't understand the basic fact that we care about quality of content, not the quantity of shit posting peers

Read the most hated boards sometime, you might just learn something.


Anonymous 08/28/2018 (Tue) 13:41:26 [Preview] No.9744 del
Balrog et. al.

Speaking of migrations, have you considered launching a completely darknet chan? This was the next step in tech all the cool kids moved off to pursue. Like UUCP and Newsgroups, are clearnet imageboards on the wrong side of history?


Anonymous 08/28/2018 (Tue) 23:43:51 [Preview] No.9745 del
>>9743
there is a distinct lack of quality and quantity on your board. its the same thing being said, over and over and over again. theres nothing new or insightful. its why everyone calls you guys autistic in the bad way.
>you might learn something
nah. i wouldn't learn anything-- because i've already learned it. i dont need something repeated ad-nauseam like you seem too.


Anonymous 08/28/2018 (Tue) 23:48:21 [Preview] No.9746 del
Balrog at some point you'll have to make a choice
either pick a userbase, or the schizos. but you can't pick both.


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 01:27:31 [Preview] No.9747 del
(38.88 KB 549x359 annoying.jpg)
>>9746
>remove the boards I don't like post 1,000


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 06:13:29 [Preview] No.9748 del
>>9747
>implying i want the board gone
Incorrect.
i want the schizos gone.
/pol/ is fine. right wing ideology is fine. naming the jew, hating niggers, and fighting communism is fine. cancer posters are not fine.


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 06:28:51 [Preview] No.9749 del
Banning Adolf would clean up a lot of board bloat and bring in more users tbh. His tyrannical moderation style doesn't jive with imageboard culture as a whole and belongs on places like reddit where such nonsense is par for the course.


‮ ‮ ⁅ ¿ ℳ ∞ Λ ? ⁆ Ⴃ Ʈ  Ф Ꞡ ‮┭┵ℛ∙ョ∙Λ∙Ͼ∙ℹ∙/ℳ∘Ḁ/┶┮‮‮ 08/29/2018 (Wed) 07:44:44 [Preview] No.9750 del
>>9746

           B
           A
CHIZOSCHIZO S
           E
           D


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 15:55:15 [Preview] No.9751 del
>1. Nuke all the zero-post boards so the site looks like less of a ghost town
Okay, that sounds reasonable.

>2. Start compiling a list of boards to keep
Why would you need that list? Just delete the boards that have no activity from users or BO for 1 month.

>3. Turn off board creation for normal accounts, set up a process for topic splitting
Why the fuck do you think we would want less freedom. This would just be 4chan 2.0, where we would need to rely on global administration to create boards for us. Fuck this shit, freedom to create boards is important, it lets communities migrate here instantly, keeps shitty BOs in check (since the community can pick another board at any moment) and decentralize power. Other than /AM/, /am/ and /mg/, I can also think of /leftypol/, about 3 GG board-splits and also 8ch's /sp/ which all successfully split.

>4. Add a "don't be a shit BO or you're getting ejected" clause to the global rules
So now global moderation would be able to arbitrarily remove BOs and control what BOs can or can't do. That's one of the reasons we jumped ship on 8chan, and we'll jump ship here too if you try to pull this shit. Who the fuck are you to decide what a shitty BO is. Might as well make rules for what kinds of free speech are or aren't acceptable if you're going full tyranny. User's are not babies, we can decide for ourselves if a BO is good or no and we can just switch boards.


Deleting dead boards is fine, taking away the basic things that make this imageboard decent will have your small userbase go >>>/anywherebuthere/ . You're still reeling from the loss of trust from the cripplekike domain. Just keep the door open and as more communities get censored elsewhere they'll come here. If you pull censorship under the guise of quality control however they'll bunker somewhere else.


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 15:59:10 [Preview] No.9752 del
>/news/ is doing fine
>we don't care about numbers
<has to shill and samefag on 8/n/
<has to post on 8/n/ where there are more than 0 posters
https://8ch.net/n/res/663551.html


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 17:48:09 [Preview] No.9753 del
>>9751
>8ch
The perfect example of why user creation doesn't work well. It favors those looking to power trip, and overly results in empty and over specialized boards. This is seen here in that only general/legacy boards here get any traffic, and certain BOs just sorta accumulate/hostile takeover board names to try and control traffic cough cough /pol/
Boards can be broad enough to cover whatever anons want to discuss, and can branch off if population grows enough to warrant. The users get a better community to post in, which attracts more users, and then boards can specialize. That's how alt chans grow and thrive. If you dont like that you can go to whatever else 8ch knockoff shithole you want. You wont be missed.
Getting rid of cancerfags I also warranted, at least early on. In the beginning when the population is so low, they offput new users because their retardation isn't being drowned out/dealt with internally. They're basically newfag repellant, which is all the reason needed not to let them head a board.


Anonymous 08/29/2018 (Wed) 17:50:27 [Preview] No.9754 del
>>9752
fuckin wew


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 06:49:08 [Preview] No.9755 del
(14.39 KB 1861x115 rulecuck.png)
reminder that THIS happened


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 07:39:23 [Preview] No.9756 del
>>9752
I belonged to that board a while ago, in fact I used to post news there a few years ago. I'm back and I'm posting there again. Got a problem with it? Tough luck. /news/ is alive and and doing very well.

>>9755
Always bringing it back to this debate. Which agency do you work for? Really? There has to be a reason you fucking hate my guts, CIA nigger.


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 08:05:26 [Preview] No.9757 del
>>9745
Clearly you have not learned a damn thing, because if you did you would have no problem with /news/ or /pol/ existing. You would have no problem with freedom of speech or those who utilize their free speech simply posting news and comments (wow, who would have thought the news would be so despised today?).

>>9746
If you can't stand it here why don't you just leave then? Go to 4chan or reddit where they actually ban unwanted posters! Go to Facebook, maybe they'll extend your pro-censorship ass an open invitation. Image boards are supposed to be meant for everyone, remember?

>>9748
>The cancer posters are gone.

Agreed. /sp/ is gone, but at least they were not censored. At least they left at their own will.


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 08:20:01 [Preview] No.9758 del
>>9757
i dont think the irony of the shit you post will ever dawn on you
>would have no problem with freedom of speech or those who utilize their free speech
/pol/ and /news/ have more bans than every other board on this entire site put together
>Go to 4chan or reddit where they actually ban unwanted posters!
literally /pol/ as stated above

>>9756
odili and balrog, as your CIA handler i demand you ban this schizo


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 14:20:49 [Preview] No.9759 del
(1.31 MB 1361x1889 1440769942924.png)
>>9753
>It favors those looking to power trip
How? It's a mechanism against power trips.

>This is seen here in that only general/legacy boards here get any traffic
Endchan barely has native population. Most of it's traffic came from elsewhere as consolidated communities and it's not a substantial traffic at all in the first place. There was a far more substantial traffic here in the days long past. What you wrote there doesn't serve to prove point you previously stated in anyway because there's no relation.

>/pol/
/pol/ here has been nazi indoctrination grounds from the get-go. There were alternative board made closer to /pol/'s original purpose but there's no real /pol/ community on endchan so they died off. It's arguable whether there's been any true /pol/ for years now. Stormfront played their cards right and long enough. This is not due to board creation feature.

>Boards can be broad enough to cover whatever anons want to discuss, and can branch off if population grows enough to warrant.
Nothing stays in the way of boards consolidating themselves if the users so desire. If users don't want that you're forcing them to be around people they don't like and that won't create

>a better community to post in
It creates strife that might eventually have to be resolved by mod by banning dissatisfied users of a side in the conflict fracturing the board just as well, only with more shitstorms.

>If you dont like that you can go to whatever else 8ch knockoff shithole you want. You wont be missed.
Reality check mate. That line would apply when this site were under admin board creation model. Endchan for all intents and purposes is a 8ch knockoff shithole so if you don't like that seek out an alternative IB that fits your point of view.

>Getting rid of cancerfags I also warranted, at least early on.
Define cancerfags and how exactly? Fullchan was a promised land during first exodus. That's a giant simplification but main ailments that came later were results of IRCwheels actively bringing in reddit in large waves instead giving the site time to grow organically. Again board creation model per se was not the cause of the problem.


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 18:00:04 [Preview] No.9760 del
>/news/ is doing fine
https://8ch.net/n/res/663551.html#663597

Anonymous 08/29/18 (Wed) 16:03:42 No.663597
>>663577
Go to endchan.xyz /news/ and /endtimes/ to find much, much more tips like that. We go crazy over there, I'll provide you with more info that I've learned over the years as a prepper if you want more tips.

>p-please visit my board


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 18:35:04 [Preview] No.9761 del
>>9759
>How? It's a mechanism against power trips.
just like how its been here, where the BO of pol has claimed 7 or 8 other pol boards, just so the traffic gets redirected to his. ffs he even tried pulling that shit with /news/ back when news was like the second most popular board.
>Endchan barely has native population
because the 8ch model doesn't work to attract and keep individual users. 8ch shows all the shit i already talked about. the user created board model doesn't work. it has a million overspecialized board, but the only ones with big communities are the legacy boards, which are horribly mismanaged namely pol and vg. it doesn't keep users. when a user is banned from one of those they dont just make their own board and stick around-- because nobody is going to post in it. so you end up slowly bleeding users and having a ridiculous number of abandoned boards. just like 8chan does. they just go back to 4chan because it actually has users and a community they can post in.
>there was a far more substantial traffic here in the days long past
i bet there fucking was.. hmmmmm, what could possibly explain why they're not here anymore?
>Nothing stays in the way of boards consolidating themselves if the users so desire.
first, they dont-- because they all want to make their own shitty board, and second they dont because theres nobody here
>main ailments that came later were results of IRCwheels actively bringing in reddit
more like mismanagement of its main boards combined with site instability, and the pitfalls of user creation in the first place.
>Define cancerfags and how exactly?
in the case of this place it would be legitimate mental illness and possible autism. ignoring or outright missing jokes, points, not understanding yims, etc. you know damn well what im talking about and when its apparent. its only really important in the early phases of growth but since things are small at that point its entirely possible to handle on a case by case basis. conveniently theres a 100% overlap between the 3 people who post on /pol/ here, and those who fit in this category.


Anonymous 08/30/2018 (Thu) 19:12:17 [Preview] No.9762 del
>>9760
>advertising a tranny fetish board on /n/
thats one sick man


Whiskey Tango Foxtrot Anonymous 08/31/2018 (Fri) 04:02:40 [Preview] No.9763 del
>500
>MongoError: The 'cursor' option is required, except for aggregate with the explain argument


Attempt 3 trying to post past errors Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 00:15:32 [Preview] No.9764 del
(60.30 KB 500x341 Confused-dindu.jpg)
>>9761
>where the BO of pol has claimed
G_C is the BO of /pol/. He doesn't even make himself out to be a target like I do. People like you keep falling for it.
Being the target for triggering shitposters and kike agendas has been the idea since day 1.
>7 or 8 other pol boards, just so the traffic gets redirected to his.
Other /pol/ boards? Let's see. I successfully requested /endpolmeta/ to take it away from the nigger spammer. Then there's /endpol/ I requested to take from Doonoo because it was filled with jewish agendas. Also /libpol/ because Doonoo made it and handed that over to me (I don't know why. To try to flag me as a liberal?) so I slapped anti-Liberal banners on there.
>ffs he even tried pulling that shit with /news/ back when news was like the second most popular board.
/news/ was second most popular Monday. Also, I (/pol/ Volunteer not BO) didn't try to claim /news/. I did claim /news/.
I am /news/ BO.
>>9762
/endtimes/ owner clearly didn't spam his own board with tranny porn. He's one of our /news/ posters I'm sure, with how many times it was mentioned. Looks like endtimes is gone now.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 00:17:09 [Preview] No.9765 del
>>9761
>where the BO of pol has claimed 7 or 8 other pol boards, just so the traffic gets redirected to his
I don't know what happened to /news/ but other alternative /pol/ boards were claimed after their BO's left them unattended right? And they did that because there was no traffic and that happened because there never was a /pol/ here that wasn't under a fullblown nazi occupation, other that the very begginings.

>because the 8ch model doesn't work to attract and keep individual users.
8ch model has nothing to do with why it's failing. The tools are there. It's the users that are not making use of them because most of the people that remained there are drones that don't care how mismanaged they are. Having it admin team supervised didn't change much in the past. Take a look at 7chan or 888chan. One started because of disagreement over moderation and the other because of a turmoil like that of gamergate - chanology. They're both largely dead now, at least compared to what they were. If they had the superior model then how? I can only think of a /jp/sphere as a successful get-away-from-4chan civilisation but they didn't make entire boards just several separate /jp/'s so it's not exactly applicable to this discussion.
No matter the model 4chan is not going to be beaten. Even a bimbo on a silver screen will talk about a hacker known as 4chan. This is why it's alive and also why it's shit.

>i bet there fucking was.. hmmmmm, what could possibly explain why they're not here anymore?
Yea you have to bet because all that knight/gray anon OC had made itself.
Didn't want to post that because drama is largely over and resolved but I wanna wipe that smirk of your ignorant face.
Read up and check the daily graphs from around that period:
https://archive.is/Elik8
https://archive.is/6m6Zp
There was a window of time when 8chan was having technical problems and people dissatisfied with what has become of IRCwheels haven't all found a place to move. See images. Problem is several sites were trying to get a piece of that traffic Librechan, Finalchan, 16chan, dare I say it Freech and Endchan but Endchan has made it's flop so didn't fare too well. Most of the above had the plug pulled off by now spare for Finalchan. Finalchan is a great counterpoint btw. It's the model you prefer and it's still as dead as endchan or even more, depending on the period.

>because they all want to make their own shitty board, and second they dont because theres nobody here
Who are we talking about? What reasons do they have for not consolidating? Oh yea we're talking about literally noone. And there's noone here because the reputation took a nosedive at a critical point and, though I don't know the details, endchan has been made into something of a boogeyman at 8chan, or so I've heard.

>more like mismanagement of its main boards combined with site instability
That came later, when userbase was pretty much unsalvageable anyways safe for those little boards scattered around that loom so large in your mind.

>you know damn well what im talking about
People tend to use slurs without much thought about what the slur means. So most are on /pol/ and most would get banned on boards that want mod issued quality control. Isn't /b/ here like the official endchan board or something?
If not here's an idea. There's a way to satisfy you without the need to throw away user board creation altogether, just have /b/ as official admin supervised board and we'll see how it'll fare. Maybe not officialy but /b/ already kinda worked like a hub, a place for newcomers to come to, a conservatively but not too strictly moderated general board, but it kinda died out anyway. I bet it's the little empty boards that are behind it.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 00:53:47 [Preview] No.9766 del
first, stop having day-long outages every other week


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 01:10:34 [Preview] No.9767 del
>>9766
They didn't choose to get ddos


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 02:54:38 [Preview] No.9768 del
The asshole came back and DDOS'd the shit out of Endchan. He also targeted information at /endtimes/ that will be restored elsewhere, also to this site at some later point. It's all been backed up. This is likely a spook who hates great quality content. I know this because I've run into them before, they're total degenerate ASSHOLES.

To refer to all the great tips once on /endtimes/ go here: https://8ch.net/prepare/index.html

This is a message to YOU tranny spammer. Your done. Forever.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 03:53:53 [Preview] No.9769 del
>>9768
>crawling back to pigchans honeypot
you're pathetic


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 03:58:24 [Preview] No.9770 del
>>9764
>>9765
tldr
balrog, odili. this is your chance to cut the fat.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 05:42:58 [Preview] No.9771 del
(47.97 KB 460x683 5.jpg)
>>9770
>please remove the boards I don't like post 1,002
>also too retarded to read a few sentences


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 07:25:05 [Preview] No.9772 del
>>9771
>expecting people to read 50+ lines of the same repetitive shit you always say
a second of my time is worth more than every post you've ever made


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 09:42:00 [Preview] No.9773 del
>>9772
Then stop wasting that "precious time" on primarily text imageboards when words bother you.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 09:48:06 [Preview] No.9774 del
>>9769
Nope. The tranny spammer who DDoS'd this whole site and nuked entire boards is pathetic. You, or anyone who supports that asshole and his censorship demands, is pathetic. You must have a lot of nerve to declare someone being "pathetic" who was only trying to save their information from being wiped off.

>>9770
For what this tranny spammer (and likely his asshole supporters too) did to this site, and to users' boards, if I were the administrator of this site I would have enforced the CAPTCHA sitewide by now. You people have so much arrogance and nerve to complain and harass the victims of your deliberate spambots and cyber attacks.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 09:54:41 [Preview] No.9775 del
>>9764
/endtimes/ was not owned by /news/ or /pol/, the asshole actually nuked someone else's board. Luckily I saved all that information I posted because I know how assholes are on the internet. I just assumed, one day, someone would ruin it. And I was right!

The tranny spammer must feel like a real good tough guy right now I'm sure. Laughing and gloating about his 'power' to destroy obscure image boards.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 10:16:37 [Preview] No.9776 del
>>9730
But you are out to get us. What happened recently proved it without a shadow of a doubt. Look at how we have to defend ourselves. Look at how we have to defend our information now. You are out to get us. You guys just DDoS'd the whole site and attacked some other user's board THINKING it belonged to us. Ironically it didn't. Now you harass other board owners not to link to the backup information?

Seriously, you deranged assholes, you are like stalkers. Don't tell me your not out to get us.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 12:33:36 [Preview] No.9777 del
(102.69 KB 659x807 1535243609139.jpg)
as long as there are people in power like Big 'HWhite up there in /pol/ there's no chance of communities growing up on main boards and then applying for a split later
they'd stumped out and scared away before they got strong enough
if you want people coming and making their home here like the Japanese the Poles the Russians and the KC international guard and /sp/ before you'd better keep supporting free board creation


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 12:58:23 [Preview] No.9778 del
(110.36 KB 659x374 1471905246.jpg)
>>9775
Not what I meant. As many times as /endtimes/ has been posted on /news/, I assumed it was just another anon's board.
>>9777
>as long as there are people in power like Big 'HWhite up there in /pol/
Eat shit. There's one of two reasons you'd have a problem with /pol/. Other than being a Stalinist Commie piece of shit


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 14:00:17 [Preview] No.9779 del
>>9777
>you'd better keep supporting free board creation

<but DO wipe out /pol/ /news/ and all the other boards I don't like

Please pic one. You can't possibly support both.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 14:06:12 [Preview] No.9780 del
>>9779
><but DO wipe out /pol/ /news/ and all the other boards I don't like
who are you quoting?


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 14:15:14 [Preview] No.9781 del
>>9780
Look through this whole thread and read it. There have been numerous calls to ban us "schizos" (their words, not mine). So what I'm trying to say is you either support the freedom of users to post content or say what they please (this includes the boards you hate) or you don't and support censorship. It cannot work both ways.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 17:06:40 [Preview] No.9782 del
>>9780
He's assuming exactly what the Stalinist wants. >>9777
I disagree with allowing completely unchecked board creation. Just the same way that boards are claimed (first come first serve when BO's abandon them), board creation should be made by request. There are too many splitting the user base. When you check the boards and go down past /italia/, there's the rest of page 1 and 11 pages of 50 boards completely empty.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 18:31:07 [Preview] No.9784 del
>ban the boards
no, nobody wants to get rid of pol and news. they want to get rid of you! its like that one shitty neighbor who has trash in their yard and is always causing disturbances. you don't want to destroy their house, you just want them gone and someone else in


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 18:32:29 [Preview] No.9785 del
>>9773
>shit meme in post
>schizo poster detected
post discard. dr


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 18:35:15 [Preview] No.9786 del
>>9782
Point is that guy didn't say anything like that.
>There are too many splitting the user base.
They're empty. They're not splitting anything. Since empty boards cause problems why not just make getting rid of them more efficient.
Even if you don't care about freedom to create board without direct admin blessing you still have to consider what >>9691 brought up. Board creation on request wastes precious time on which the decision to move here or elsewhere hinges.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 21:11:05 [Preview] No.9789 del
>>9786
>Point is that guy didn't say anything like that.
Completely ignoring the incapable of capitalizing sentences anon who's shilled throughout this entire thread against /pol/ and /news/.
>>9777
>as long as there are people in power like Big 'HWhite up there in /pol/ there's no chance of communities growing up
>>9786
>you still have to consider what >>9691 brought up
I don't have to consider any point brought up by a big-tits furry lover.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 21:23:42 [Preview] No.9790 del
reminder


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 21:42:43 [Preview] No.9791 del
>>9790
Clearly lifted because that ban ID is nowhere in the ban logs.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:05:55 [Preview] No.9792 del
(28.28 KB 791x150 lifted.jpg)
>>9790
Not listed in the bans page on board access panel I mean, but I did find this in the logs. Still looking for the original ban.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:20:41 [Preview] No.9793 del
>>9791
i mean.. odili can easily confirm this, since he's the one that posted this.
it just shows how retarded and offputting the /pol/ and /news/ administration is since the most non-partisan, and overly-neutral force on this site can get banned there because they're delusional


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:41:13 [Preview] No.9794 del
>>9793
Actually, /news/ was in the hands of Doonoo/Emmanuel who used to shill /endpol/ and before that RedPillDropper who was fired from /pol/ while /news/ links were constantly being posted on /pol/. This current claim that "bans are bad" is from those that haven't even been over the ban logs back through early 2017. aemiliusbatavi and MrSaturday did their jobs. Ecco did his job. As globals, Odilitime and Balrog have done their jobs.

Current /pol/ and /news/ are not any different than endchan has been since the beginning.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:41:57 [Preview] No.9795 del
>>9784
Sorry but you'll just have to deal with a neighbor you don't like then. Why should I be censored because I contribute content you don't agree with? Don't tell me that isn't the case either, that is exactly the case. You don't like reading the news I post so you are calling for me to be censored.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:51:48 [Preview] No.9796 del
>>9793
I am a member of news, the BO is a separate person and although the rules tend to be strict usually there are reasons why. In some cases people will spam the board. Even the asshole tranny poster has been there, so has "the brown pill" guy. In other cases we'll have folks trolling other users just to harass them, completely unrelated to throw off conversation. Sometimes there are the real crazies that come along and flood the board with repetitive "poo in the loo" Indian shitting threads (and they know it annoys us while doing it). The Qnon guy came along posting "news" which had NO news links to back anything he had to say.... so come on. We do need some rules for the news board.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:51:55 [Preview] No.9797 del
>>9795
>content
its not the content.. its you!
all you schizo posters kill this site


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 22:55:41 [Preview] No.9798 del
>>9797
Yes, anon. News is considered content. Informative content. And if I was "killing the site" then why are you even here? Why does the site still have a fair amount of traffic? The truth is I'm not killing the site. YOU are the one who is paranoid and its because of your bias against our content.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 23:13:42 [Preview] No.9799 del
>>9798
I really doubt it's his bias against /news/ content. He was clearly banned at one point for being the same obnoxious cunt he's being now. Their butthurt afterwards tends to last a very long time. And as usual, his effort is very low, unaccomplished and completely laughable.


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 23:32:29 [Preview] No.9800 del
>>9798
even after all this time you still dont understand what the argument is.. let me try and put this in a way even an autistic child could understand.

Timmy and Tommy have the same toys. But nobody likes playing with Timmy, and everybody gravitates towards Tommy.

That's because Timmy doesn't play well with others. He doesn't understand their games, can't communicate well, and kicks them out of the game if he gets mad.

Meanwhile, Tommy is the opposite. He understands their games, and helps foster them. Even if he gets mad, the game goes on. Sometimes there are quarrels, but they're always forgiven and forgotten.

You're Timmy. Tommy is most of the other boards and users here. The toys are content/beliefs. The games are memes and imageboard antics.

Now on its own, that would be fine. But the real problem begins when Timmy decides to go play with Tommy and the others, after throwing a tantrum earlier. He enters their game uninvited and unwanted. When he's told this, instead of leaving he sits down, throws a fit, and starts taking the other kids toys. At some point into this, some of the kids get fed up and leave. Others go and start breaking Timmys stuff.

This is why if i search for antispam*.jpg, or long paragraphs of copy paste and archive links, i'd probly find some in almost every single active board. It's why /pol/ only has 3 users, and why /pol/ BO owns every other pol board on the front page, as well as the formerly successful /news/ board. its why those same boards again, have post deletions and bans for every single day of its existence. It's why those boards have a literal handful of users. It's why those boards are constantly "under attack". It's why this site doesn't retain users.

The problem isn't every other user on the site. The problem is you!


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 23:34:27 [Preview] No.9801 del
>>9800
checked


Anonymous 09/01/2018 (Sat) 23:58:04 [Preview] No.9802 del
(36.26 KB 478x435 02.jpg)
>>9800
You're talking to a /news/ poster and identifying him as /pol/ BO while simultaneously describing yourself to a T. The way you bitch and complain with your elaborate bullshit. Never letting up on the whining D&C towards /pol/ and /news/. The hypocrisy is fucking hilarious, Timmy.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:26:01 [Preview] No.9803 del
>>9802
>identifying him as /pol/ bo
uhh... wut
never happened. he was addressed as one of the 3 schizos consisting of adolf, gc and newsretard. i think its hilarious that you read the entire, intentionally simplified analogy, and all you got out of it was misattributing the intended audience, and somehow thinking that its a good descriptor of your detractors. to you, every other user on here that dislikes you is Timmy. in your mind, you really believe that theres an entire chan consisting of Timmys, and you're the one Tommy. forget that having it flipped like that breaks the analogy, but by G*d this the most delusional shit ive ever seen lol


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:26:52 [Preview] No.9804 del
(84.29 KB 800x531 nazi_fur.jpg)
>>9789
>Completely ignoring the incapable of capitalizing sentences anon who's shilled throughout this entire thread against /pol/ and /news/.
>I don't have to consider any point brought up by a big-tits furry lover.
content over identity


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:27:30 [Preview] No.9805 del
>>9803
don't worry, the persecution is real in his mind. the CIA is trying to censor and depose him. he is SINGLE HANDEDLY destroying the ZOG narrative. JIDF shill agents will never break him.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:29:50 [Preview] No.9806 del
isn't the news guy a cuckold? i seem to remember him posting about trying to kick some "degenerate" porn habits


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:46:17 [Preview] No.9808 del
(37.23 KB 480x484 62.jpg)
>>9803
>uhh... wut
>never happened.
^This is why you're retarded, because then you go on to say it's G_C.
>he was addressed as one of the 3 schizos consisting of adolf, gc and newsretard.
G_C doesn't post on /operate/. He doesn't even bat an eye about your weak attempts even when I tell him. He is BO of /pol/. See, he's the silent observing type and I'm the target you fall for every time.
>>9805
I've posted about supporting CIA who identify Zionists in the past, and no single man is capable pf destroying the mass media ZOG narrative. Try harder.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 00:52:52 [Preview] No.9810 del
>>9808
>this is why you're retarded, because then you go on to say it's G_C
nope. literally didn't.
>G_C doesn't post on /operate/
trust me, all three of you retards are in this shitstorm of a thread. you guys always are.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 01:18:05 [Preview] No.9811 del
(43.61 KB 309x372 2013052436.jpg)
>>9810
>nope. literally didn't. hurr durr
>>9803
>consisting of adolf, gc and newsretard.
>trust me
Never have, never will. See, your typing is as shit as when you posted identifying yourself as a Stalinist.
>>9777
You and I know the reason behind your triggered responses.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 01:20:59 [Preview] No.9813 del
>>9811
>Never have, never will.
what??
what are you even responding to?
are you trying to say you never have posted here, and never will? all while making that post?
what level of retardation is this


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 01:23:06 [Preview] No.9814 del
>>9813
Goddamn you're illiterate. I'll explain it to you like you have a 5 year old's concentration span because you do
I
followed
greentext
where you said
"trust me"
by saying
Never have, never will


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 03:47:09 [Preview] No.9817 del
>>9814
>does multiple greentexts from multiple different posts
>puts it under a post response that doesn't even include one of them
>goes on to reference something im not even familiar with misidentifying
>expects the meaning to be clear
how to make confusing responses 101
remember how i said you can't communicate for shit?


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 13:23:55 [Preview] No.9819 del
(219.25 KB 640x480 142.jpg)
>>9817
>Can barely understand English and can't capitalize anything.
>"your responses are confusing :("
I don't care. I know why you continue wasting your time here.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 18:30:56 [Preview] No.9821 del
>>9819
i really wish i could go into your head and see what you think of yourselves
despite how you guys constantly misidentify, misrespond sometimes even attacking eachother, and just generally suck at communicating, you still have this idea of yourself as some incredibly suave individual. even when you make some confusing and convoluted response
its absolutely jaw dropping to watch


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 18:35:29 [Preview] No.9822 del
for the love of G*d Balrog and Odil, put an end to this madness


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 18:49:16 [Preview] No.9824 del
>>9821
>even when you make some confusing and convoluted response
its absolutely jaw dropping to watch
It's fucking amazing how good you are at hypocrisy.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 18:53:05 [Preview] No.9825 del
>>9822
>censors God, revealing his kikery
It's always jews who hate /pol/ and /news/.
>put an end to this madness
I have an idea. Shut the fuck up and stop crying. Otherwise you're the other half of "this madness". Keep responding, this will go on forever. Makes no difference to me.


I like madness Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/02/2018 (Sun) 19:01:38 [Preview] No.9826 del
For the love of Adolf put an end to Balrog and Odil! But, you can keep the madness.


Anonymous 09/02/2018 (Sun) 19:13:16 [Preview] No.9827 del
>>9826
>>9825
>>9824
>everyone who dislikes me is a kike
Adolph pls
i see you didn't bother realizing the implications of that analogy earlier


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 01:17:46 [Preview] No.9830 del
>>9826
Nice try, but I don't want an end to Balrog or Odilitime. I'm sure they can tell even without IDs who I am.
>>9827
A Stalinist is a Commie is a kike. You revealed yourself before. Bet you thought the image was too obscure to catch.


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 01:22:04 [Preview] No.9831 del
>>9674
They've said before and I admitted, I have several boards. /endpol/, /x/, /endpolmeta/, /libpol/ (given by Doonoo maybe as a joke) and another board I don't want to mention here. I'll delete all of those should you decide to end board creation. As it is now, they'll just remake them for the lulz.


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 07:37:20 [Preview] No.9832 del
>>9830
>You revealed yourself before. Bet you thought the image was too obscure to catch.
m8 wut
i haven't posted an image this entire thread
this is incredible


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 10:44:35 [Preview] No.9833 del
>>9800
This doesn't make any sense what-so-ever because the news poster is not even the BO, the BO being the only one who can kick people off the board. Dig?

And /news/ is successful, there have never been many users anyway. The content has been great. The only reason you are bitter is because you don't like the content I post and you don't like me. And you know what? I don't care. I learn to live with that fact. You better to.


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 10:53:09 [Preview] No.9834 del
>>9803
Right now I'm playing very fair and minding my own business. Censorship won't work. If you don't want to play fair - believe me fucker - I don't have to play fair either. Dig?


Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/03/2018 (Mon) 16:17:26 [Preview] No.9835 del
Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear


Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/03/2018 (Mon) 16:19:42 [Preview] No.9836 del
Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair


Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/03/2018 (Mon) 16:22:08 [Preview] No.9837 del
Fuzzy Wuzzy went insane


Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/03/2018 (Mon) 16:24:08 [Preview] No.9838 del
Fuzzy Wuzzy killed again


Fuzzy Wuzzy 09/03/2018 (Mon) 16:26:09 [Preview] No.9839 del
_/\!/\_


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 18:34:16 [Preview] No.9840 del
>>9834
>don't have to play fair either. Dig?
by all means stupid nigger-- play unfair. you're so incompetant you can't accomplish anything anyway 😂


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 20:55:39 [Preview] No.9844 del
>>9840
>muh disparaging tactics
Cry more.


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 22:37:47 [Preview] No.9846 del
>>9840
Unlike you, I don't break rules. I would only if absolutely necessary. For example: if /news/ and/or /pol/ were to be taken down, you should expect the content to spread rapidly on any popular board. And if banned, I'd just change IPs rapidly (because I have multiple VPN options).

Again, I'm not doing this because I have end/news/ and end/pol/ (and 8ch/n/ again after I figured out my browser bug) to post content. Thats all I want, thats all I need. But note this... if this were to change, expect me to become very disgruntled and not play by the rules anymore. And all hell would break loose. If you think its bad now, you don't even want to go there. I backup EVERYTHING and can re-post anything anytime I please to do so.

So this is my warning. Back off on the censorship threats.


Anonymous 09/03/2018 (Mon) 23:46:33 [Preview] No.9847 del
>>9846
>I'd just change IPs rapidly (because I have multiple VPN option
bruh
you're tech illiterate
you'd run out of VPNs and motivation long before you could 'break' anyones spirit. anyone that deals with you long enough realizes you're all bark and no bite-- you dont have a clue whats going on you ever figure out how to get those files open btw? lol
>>9844
im cryin alright
from laughter 😂😂😂


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 00:20:14 [Preview] No.9850 del
>>9846
>i dont break rules
aren't you the guy that goes into other peoples boards and will continually post "antispamxx.jpg" images until pictures are pushed off the front page?
mind explaining how that's not breaking Global Rule 3?


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 01:46:44 [Preview] No.9851 del
>>9847
You don't "run out of VPNs" easily. Each VPN has dozens of different IP ranges. You could pick one single IP range, and that will randomly generate an IP. Note each IP range could have about 200,000 different IPs. Multiply that by two dozen (to be conservative). Thats ONE single VPN service. Not to mention many, many others out there (which are dirt cheap, and I can afford ALL of them).

>You'd give up
Uh, no. I'm dedicated at reporting news. This is what I do. This is my kicks. I won't back down. Keep telling yourself that.

Anyway, you have nothing to worry about, because I'm not being censored. Its just not happening.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 01:48:23 [Preview] No.9852 del
>>9851
looks like someone doesn't know about IP rangebans...
you're a man, not a machine. you're not some unstoppable bot. you're a barely functional poster, whos trash would get picked up and who would get bullied until he leaves-- as has happened several times already.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 02:01:30 [Preview] No.9853 del
>>9852
I don't cower to bullies as you already know. I could give a fuck less what you or anyone thinks of me, unless that is you accept me and this makes me accept your feelings and makes me more considerate. Hate me and I become an inconsiderate bastard who will simply ignore all insults and continue posting whether others like it or not.

About IP range bans. Not a good idea.Too many will simply ruin the boards. Anyone else who uses those VPNs? They'll be blocked too. So that means no more anonymity. And what about Tor? I have Tor too I can utilize. Same situation though. You'd lose more than half the crowd blocking Tor and all those VPNs. Not to mention the massive headaches.

If you want a censored controlled environment, I'll name a few. Reddit, Facebook, Instragram, Snapchat, Twitter, etc.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 03:51:27 [Preview] No.9855 del
>>9851
>>9853
Are you going to answer >>9850 though?


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 03:54:02 [Preview] No.9856 del
>>9853
>If you want a censored controlled environment, I'll name a few. Reddit, Facebook, Instragram, Snapchat, Twitter, etc.
end/pol/. end/news/.. end/polmeta/...


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 14:13:11 [Preview] No.9857 del
>>9856
Your the one calling for the news poster to be banned and all VPN ranges blocked off, and the BO to be removed. Thats not censorship to you?

Listen up, if you want your own board with your own rules then go make one yourself. Or just post on /sp/ again. Or shitpost on /b/ for all I care. Don't whine about other boards you don't even contribute to and who's purpose run clockwise to your beliefs or agendas. If you want a board that serves your purpose then make one and promote it to your peers. All we ask is to be left alone (unless someone sane wants to contribute to a discussion, they're welcome to do so as long as rules are followed).


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 14:18:37 [Preview] No.9858 del
>>9855
I ONLY did that to wipe off tranny porn spam clogging up the whole front page. Do you really like the sight of tranny dicks that much sicko? Well I and most others don't!

And you... you have the nerve to claim I "ruin" the website. Fuck you you lying sack of shit.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 17:56:02 [Preview] No.9859 del
>>9858
>I ONLY did that to wipe off tranny porn spam clogging up the whole front page
completely and utterly provably false.
here you are spamming /am/
>>>/am/33647
>>>/am/33648
then again in /AM/
>>>/AM/27906
>>>/AM/27907
spamming /operate/
>>8392
spamming /b/
>>>/b/17849
here is a post showing when you spammed /librejp/ and toshaki had to clean it up
>>>/librejp/122496

this is just the shit i could find in about 5 min of looking. here's even a post calling you out for spamming

>>>/b/17850
>yeah you are a spammer you keep going to librejp and spamming there cause you cant use any of the billion inactive boards i guess. you really have no courtesy you know that? this is /b/ the random board you can post whatever you want here. im just sharing pics i like

you don't "ONLY did that to wipe off tranny spam"-- you do it constantly and anytime you see any singular image you don't like. what gives you the right to spam boards if they post stuff you don't like huh? you seem like a massive hypocrite. i can't wait to hear whatever rationalization you have for this one.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 18:00:07 [Preview] No.9860 del
(100.53 KB 640x640 Thinking_Face_Emoji.png)
>>9857
>all we ask is to be left alone
<does >>9859 related
<dominates all name related boards to try and stop competition
<hostile takeovers more successful boards and tries to force them to crosspost


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 18:05:56 [Preview] No.9861 del
/pol/ and /news/ are doing fi-
>>>/news/12465
>shoring up /news/ with stuff from /pol/
>>>/news/12468
>when newsautist isn't around neither board gets any traffic only 1 user
>>>/news/12496
>"/pol/ isn't doing so good"
woah
inb4 those posts get edited


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 19:25:19 [Preview] No.9862 del
>gets btfo in the thread
<goes to spam in retaliation
lmao, >we thrive in the spam. knock yourself out boomer.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 19:57:01 [Preview] No.9864 del
(26.51 KB 367x451 Ah_000621_565910.jpg)
>>9859
>here's a tranny dick spam post calling a straight anon a spammer
I'm going to report that globally. Thanks for pointing it out, faggot.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 19:58:53 [Preview] No.9865 del
>>9864
>im going to report that globally
>telling everyone you're going to abuse the global report tool
are you a fucking idiot? odili and balrog you need to handle these retards


Balrog Board owner 09/04/2018 (Tue) 20:12:54 [Preview] No.9867 del
>>9834
>Right now I'm playing very fair and minding my own business. Censorship won't work. If you don't want to play fair - believe me fucker - I don't have to play fair either. Dig?
>>9846
>For example: if /news/ and/or /pol/ were to be taken down, you should expect the content to spread rapidly on any popular board. And if banned, I'd just change IPs rapidly (because I have multiple VPN options).
Is this a threat?


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 23:26:01 [Preview] No.9869 del
>>9867
The guy saying that is neither the BO or Vol of /pol/ nor /news/. I hope you and Odilitime have the ability to tell posters apart on this board.


Anonymous 09/04/2018 (Tue) 23:27:04 [Preview] No.9870 del
>>9865
It's not abusing the report tool when faggots are posting dicks everywhere and that is exactly what took the site down with 1.25GB of the shit. Go fuck yourself.


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 01:24:14 [Preview] No.9871 del
>>9870
do you even know what global report is for???
nobody is posting spam here but you, so you need to calm down and quit acting like a sperg
>>9869
>what is the admin panel
seriously?


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 03:41:00 [Preview] No.9872 del
>>9871
I don't post any spam. You're assuming I'm the straight-porn spam retaliating guy. You really can't handle this board without IDs, can you?
>what is the admin panel
>seriously?
How the fuck would I know what their admin panel allows them to do? I only know of individual board BO and Vol panels. They certainly don't distinguish between who's who.


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 04:41:57 [Preview] No.9873 del
>>9872
try using some common sense than you damn scrub


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 19:23:25 [Preview] No.9876 del
>>9873
Nobody cares to translate your ebonics, Tyrone.


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 20:46:31 [Preview] No.9877 del
>>9859
I also posted some to /test/ too. But those were all times the front page was covered with tranny dick pics. I NEVER do that unless the spammer strikes first. So what's wrong? The tranny spammer doesn't obey those rules either by the way, so why should I have to? Again, what goes around comes around, consequences inevitable.

To those boards I apologize, my intentions were good, I did not mean to harm in any way UNLIKE they tranny spammer (which wrecked whole boards and which I never ever did anything of the sort).


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 20:53:59 [Preview] No.9879 del
>>9872
/news/ and /pol/ welcomes IDs. As well as mandated CAPTCHAs to prevent bot spam! Others who typically hate us, do not. I wonder why that could be?


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 21:11:14 [Preview] No.9880 del
(191.53 KB 1102x743 Screenshot - 09052018.png)
>>9870
I wonder what happened to the board the tranny spammer completely wrecked? Here is a SCREENSHOT. Notice the date posted, a day after the website came back up.

Again, here is some evidence of what the board actually looked like before it was raided by the tranny spammer: >>9878

How is that not against the rules? Please do tell!


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 21:16:52 [Preview] No.9881 del
>>9877
>>9879
>>9880
Correct. Someone really does "love" this website. Please put all bias aside and take a minute to think about all this.


Anonymous 09/05/2018 (Wed) 21:46:18 [Preview] No.9882 del
Ask yourself this honest question (and please look it up in the archives if you don't believe me):

Did /news/ or /pol/ ever once endorse the censorship of other boards or banning other boards? NO! Did we ever collude to ruin other boards? NO! Please take a chance to review the older archives:

https://archive.fo/https://endchan.xyz/news/*
https://archive.fo/https://endchan.xyz/pol/*

I'm simply pointing this all out because there is a subversive group calling for us to be banned. These are the same people who got caught posting tranny dick spam (and wrecking boards with their bots). In fact, these are the same people who DDoS'd Endchan. Remember while Endchan was DDoS'd the front page was filled with tranny pics? That was from /endtimes/ when it was targeted! Its not hard to figure this out once you look at the evidence linked above. So I am asking you anons, do your research... these people hate us... they hate this website... they want to censor the website's content... these are BAD people.


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 00:11:50 [Preview] No.9884 del
Odiltime you need to set global captchas and board IDs NOW!


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 01:34:45 [Preview] No.9885 del
Balrog you need to ban Odiltime NOW!


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 07:41:01 [Preview] No.9886 del
(191.53 KB 1102x743 Screenshot - 09052018.png)
>>9884
It would not be a bad idea. The only ones to fear would be the bad actors like the tranny spammer. We all know damn well now that this is the same anon who is bashing /news/ and /pol/ too, [see pic of hijacked board as proof].

I recommend all BOs enforce CAPTCHAs to protect their boards from this level of retardation and fuckery.


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 10:54:37 [Preview] No.9887 del
(101.33 KB 1000x595 false_flag-1.jpg)
>>9880
>BO of /endtimes/
>"I also like to post the good word in >>>/news/ and >>>/pol/"
Wow
No wonder that board was removed by Odilitime.
>>9885
>ban Odilitime
lol. How fucking stupid that would be. Lets ban the site admin so everything falls apart.


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 11:05:48 [Preview] No.9888 del
>>9887
To be clear that board was removed after the tranny spammer nuked it with a bot. I wish I captured a screenshot of that incident but didn't. The ironic thing is no one knew who the original board owner was. I simply used the board to post some info on there, and the /news/ /pol/ tranny-loving stalker goes and nukes the board with dick pics. Then, the site goes down, I check the twitter account and it was confirmed under DDoS attack. I think it had something to do with the amount of spam the bot was flooding that board with.

But at least now we know that whoever is bashing /news/ and /pol/ is also connected to spam bots and DDoS attacks. So this is an 'infowar' operation on their behalf. Odilitime is right, "we're loved."


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 11:14:12 [Preview] No.9889 del
>>9888
I'm sure site admins know who the BO of /endtimes/ was. Nothing more than a screenshot and signing in with their role signature will be accepted, due to the lying nature of enemies of /pol/ and /news/.


Anonymous 09/06/2018 (Thu) 20:09:47 [Preview] No.9890 del
Hey Odili-- Balrog,
This is your CIA handler, it looks like the jig is up. the /news/ anon who i call /news/schizo as a psyop tactic has foiled our entire plan. Please activate the emergency contingency plan, which involves banning /pol/ and /news/ before they can inform the other users of what is going on. This is all part of our information warfare tactics that we use against the truth.
-Mr CIA


Anonymous 09/12/2018 (Wed) 11:05:04 [Preview] No.9897 del
(669.61 KB 1471x513 pol.png)


Anonymous 09/12/2018 (Wed) 15:44:09 [Preview] No.9898 del
Why are they so obsessed with news and pol? When will they just move along and get on with their lives? I just don't get it.


Anonymous 09/12/2018 (Wed) 17:10:43 [Preview] No.9899 del
>>9897
>PPH: 2
>UID: 17
g_c and adolph_hitler hopping vpns to inflate UIDs artifically. Sad!


Anonymous 09/12/2018 (Wed) 20:42:10 [Preview] No.9900 del
(65.20 KB 600x1005 840.jpg)
>>9899
>thinks either of us have VPNs when there are clearly threads with the same ID by us going on for miles
You could easily find out by going to a thread on /pol/ where there's G_C's BO title or my Vol title and checking how many times the IDs show up. But you're not going to do that because the truth doesn't matter to you. Only the shit you make up. You have an entire site on your own and you can't stop obsessing over us. Pic related.
>>9898
We trigger them. It's that simple.


Anonymous 09/13/2018 (Thu) 01:26:05 [Preview] No.9901 del
>>9899
I use a VPN and routinely jump IPs for a reason fucker, because of CIA niggers like you. The fuck if I'm going to let my haters easily hack me.


Anonymous 09/13/2018 (Thu) 18:06:37 [Preview] No.9902 del
>>9901
You do that on /news/ mostly though (unless you're LARPing right now). G_C has told probably you (might be another anon) that you're more than welcome at /pol/. We don't discriminate VPNs. The accusation was that G_C or myself use them. We don't. It's painfully obvious in threads where our ID stays the same throughout.


Anonymous 09/13/2018 (Thu) 22:54:01 [Preview] No.9903 del
>leave thread for several weeks
>come back
>the schizos are STILL crying about shit and desperately trying to get their board ranking up
lmfao


Anonymous 09/14/2018 (Fri) 04:45:43 [Preview] No.9904 del
/am/ seems to be spammed up and never cleaned since 2016. Is it done on purpose as a honeypot for bots?


Anonymous 09/14/2018 (Fri) 10:53:33 [Preview] No.9905 del
>>9903
>every day, there's some faggot lacking in basic grammar shrieking on /operate/ about /pol/ or /news/
FTFY


Anonymous 09/14/2018 (Fri) 16:18:20 [Preview] No.9908 del
>>9902
I do that everywhere. When I use my VPN that IP goes with me until I change it to another IP and that one goes with me until I change it to another, and so on and so on. I try changing it every couple hours or so to keep my computer from being hacked/compromised.


neverdie Anonymous 09/14/2018 (Fri) 17:30:37 [Preview] No.9910 del


Anonymous 09/15/2018 (Sat) 01:18:35 [Preview] No.9911 del
>>9908
>I try changing it every couple hours or so to keep my computer from being hacked/compromised.
more like trying to boost your board numbers and still managing to fail


Anonymous 09/16/2018 (Sun) 04:49:21 [Preview] No.9912 del
>>9911
It's not his board, and I am not going to discriminate against his VPN.


Anonymous 09/16/2018 (Sun) 20:03:32 [Preview] No.9913 del
>>9911
You are still retarded when it comes to the fact the WE DO NOT CARE ABOUT NUMBERS. We care about the content of information. Why is this so hard for you to understand?

1,000 natural-born liars is NOT better than two or three fact checkers and truth tellers.


Anonymous 09/17/2018 (Mon) 17:59:51 [Preview] No.9914 del
>>9913
>doesn't care about numbers
>desperately shills his board here and one 8/n/
>constantly boosts the ranking with different IPs
>brags when the ranking goes up
one of these things is not like the others.


Anonymous 09/18/2018 (Tue) 02:12:38 [Preview] No.9915 del
>>9914
>keeps confusing one person for another
>does this intentionally, his butt hurts this much


Anonymous 09/18/2018 (Tue) 10:50:39 [Preview] No.9916 del
>>9914
My history you are unfamiliar with I notice. I was posting news to 8ch/n/ BEFORE I ever migrated over here. The only reason I migrated over here was because I had a browser issue (unknown to me at the time) which prevented me from posting on 8ch/n/. At first I thought 8ch/n/ was deliberately blocking my VPN provider... turns out I was wrong, it was a browser issue the whole time. So I started posting to 8ch/n/ AGAIN recently. They know I'm back. However, I love Endchan as well, and I love /news/ and /pol/ so I will continue to feed scoops daily here.

As far as my IPs. Its a VPN provider, I change my IPs because I want security. I don't know who the hell could be trying to stalk me. Maybe someone like you?


Anonymous 09/19/2018 (Wed) 11:08:46 [Preview] No.9917 del
(28.99 KB 323x640 3454754.jpg)
>>9916
He's actually more intent on stalking me. That's why he sees everybody, including yourself and also /pol/'s BO, as me. I was "the Hitler spammer" accused and despised by compromised Vols who later spammed /pol/ before I came aboard as /pol/ Vol or /news/ BO. This imagery is meant to be a target. Always has been. When someone's very triggered by the appearance of Hitler, that reveals their jewish traits time and again.


Anonymous 09/19/2018 (Wed) 14:27:22 [Preview] No.9918 del
>>9916
I could be your very own personal Internet stalker, Anon.

<3


Anonymous 09/20/2018 (Thu) 03:45:44 [Preview] No.9920 del
lul u guys are are so delusional
i just call any one of you three either adolph, or schizo because:
1. youre all interchangeably dull
2. you'll rant about being misspelled or miscalled
the only reason I dont fuck with you 24/7 is because youre too predictable and it gets boring.


Anonymous 09/21/2018 (Fri) 00:27:53 [Preview] No.9921 del
If this site cant stay up, just shut it down. Youre killing the community by extending a dead creature.


Anonymous 09/21/2018 (Fri) 00:50:29 [Preview] No.9922 del
Please don't let the site die. What about the "seeking new blood" thread we where supposed to be expanding?


odilitime Board volunteer 09/21/2018 (Fri) 00:55:43 [Preview] No.9923 del
>>9922
There has been zero talk about shutting down the site. We did get some new help


Anonymous 09/21/2018 (Fri) 02:25:00 [Preview] No.9924 del
>>9923
Seems like a troll thanks for confirming that. I remeber snakedude wanted the users to fund the site and we should keep doing that as sparse as it is but have you considered putting non intrusive ads like 4chan and 8chan to get some self sustainability? I don't see how it would be as much of a change as potentially considering locking board creation.


Anonymous 09/21/2018 (Fri) 13:18:31 [Preview] No.9928 del
>>9920
how about you just shut up already and mind your own beeswax?
if you don't like someone's board then simply refuse to participate and move on.
there are plenty of other boards that have nothing to do with those you hate so much.


Anonymous 09/22/2018 (Sat) 04:16:12 [Preview] No.9929 del
>>9928
>why dont you mind your own business
<spams that persons board repeatedly
i doubt you ever realized it but all the botspam of the past year that occurred in places you post happened after your stupid antispam shit showed up places they shouldn't be


Anonymous 09/22/2018 (Sat) 14:11:23 [Preview] No.9930 del
>>9929
Thats because the tranny spammer was posting pictures of dicks all over the place FIRST, and it was all over the front page. Someone has to clean that stuff so I did, with pics of non-nude teen girls and female models. Big fucking deal, right? How dare I not accept dick pics all over the front page of Endchan, leave it be! Is that what you suggest?


Anonymous 09/22/2018 (Sat) 14:17:02 [Preview] No.9931 del
>>9930
And even when I did clean the front page up, I never spammed boards into oblivion like the dick-lover did. I was very considerate not to annoy the hell out of people, unlike the tranny spammer who made it a personal goal to annoy people.


Anonymous 09/23/2018 (Sun) 03:34:20 [Preview] No.9932 del
>>9930
>>9931
actually, it started just as occasional pictures of traps posted on /sp/ as a joke. you didn't like that they appeared on the front page, and instead of disabling NSFW boards because you're a retard, you instead would flood /sp/ with your photos to wipe the front page. half of them which you stole off /sp/ in the first place.
now lets be entirely clear. nobody has to 'clean that stuff'. its not against the rules, and you had the ability to hide it, but chose not to.
next, instead of posting into any uninhabited board, you decided to dump it in /sp/. you were warned to stop, but you refused.
in short, you were the cause of it when you started breaking global rule 3. and you continue to break it. i saw you spamming /librejp/ the other day


Anonymous 09/24/2018 (Mon) 12:41:45 [Preview] No.9933 del
>>9932
I'm not denying everything you say because I can't even recall many details of how this all got started, but either you are an autistic stalker or you are a spook working for a government agency tracking me... maybe both. This is why I use a VPN. You stalkers really scare me sometimes, you need to mind your own business and please tell you buddies to stop posting tranny pics, you know the goal is to piss people off and wreck the reputation of this great website. So please stop and you won't see pics of cute girls popping up either. I think thats a pretty fair deal.


Anonymous 09/24/2018 (Mon) 12:48:20 [Preview] No.9934 del
>>9932
>i saw you spamming /librejp/ the other day

If I posted a few cute girl pics on /librejp/ it was likely because they were posting pics of CP or tranny photos showing up on the front page: CP being illegal/abusive and tranny pics being subversive/abusive. I advise the web owner to investigate potential crime if it was CP and have it reported.


Anonymous 09/24/2018 (Mon) 19:01:45 [Preview] No.9936 del
(145.53 KB 1024x682 take your meds.jpeg)
>>9933
>everyone is CIA! they're out to get ME!
take your meds schizo

also I was 100% right lmao >>9907


Anonymous 09/24/2018 (Mon) 19:12:24 [Preview] No.9937 del
>>9936
Schizos like you like to stalk people online. I do my best to mind my own business, but will not hesitate to defend myself from schizos if need be.

Btw, that other comment you posted was someone else. Don't know why you think it was me. Guess my VPN is working as intended.


Anonymous 09/24/2018 (Mon) 19:16:44 [Preview] No.9938 del
>>9936
Are you the crab spammer by any chance? He always posted the "take your meds" meme too. If not, he is a lot like you, doesn't like anyone who tells the truth or who posts legit news.


Anonymous 09/25/2018 (Tue) 21:10:23 [Preview] No.9943 del
>>9937
>s-stop replying to me on this imageboard, y-you're stalking me!


Anonymous 09/28/2018 (Fri) 17:45:45 [Preview] No.9946 del
>>9938
>everyone tells you to take your meds
>its everyone else who has the problem, not you
lol 'no'


Anonymous 09/30/2018 (Sun) 06:52:27 [Preview] No.9947 del
>>9936
>the one guy who says I'm working for the government must mean EVERYONE who's for /pol/ or /news/
I see the same bullshit artist still infests /operate/.


Anonymous 10/01/2018 (Mon) 12:29:16 [Preview] No.9948 del
>>9943
>calls for censorship of others
>others reply
>calls them schizos over censorship concerns

They started it by talking about banning our boards, God forbid we won't ignore their SJW calls for censorship. If you point the finger at someone, expect that person to take notice and question you is all I'm saying.


Anonymous 10/03/2018 (Wed) 06:55:18 [Preview] No.9952 del
>>9948
banning boards??
nah.
just banning you because you act like a faggot


Anonymous 10/07/2018 (Sun) 16:01:35 [Preview] No.9959 del
>>9952
I think YOU act like a faggot. Does that mean I call for banning you? No. Censorship is not the answer and I can guarantee you 100% you won't be able to ban me. I have private VPN services at my disposal anytime if that were to happen, including Tor. You have no clue how much I could annoy the living shit out of all of you...... IF I WANTED TO.


Anonymous 10/09/2018 (Tue) 04:27:47 [Preview] No.9960 del
>>9959
so what you're saying is that you're unintentionally this annoying??
how obnoxious.
besides you've called for me to be banned like a dozen times already.


Anonymous 10/11/2018 (Thu) 14:21:34 [Preview] No.9979 del
>>9960
I never called for anyone to be banned. I have always been the one responding to others calling for /news/ and /pol/ users to be banned. /news/ & /pol/ have never hurt anyone. No one should be banned unless they deliberately spam or wreck boards and that decision should be left up to the BOs of each board.


Anonymous 10/14/2018 (Sun) 17:17:09 [Preview] No.9991 del
>>9979
>ignoring the mountain of evidence of /pol/ and /news/ spamming other boards


Anonymous 10/22/2018 (Mon) 11:06:35 [Preview] No.10011 del
(125.47 KB 600x460 1441489325934.jpg)
>>9991
>claims "mountain of evidence"
>hasn't provided any


Anonymous 10/28/2018 (Sun) 18:09:02 [Preview] No.10053 del
>>10011
>gaslighting on the very same thread that the evidence is posted in
>any anon could literally click the linked posts and see for themselves
lmao ok retard
thats how i know youre a lying little kike


Anonymous 10/28/2018 (Sun) 18:52:02 [Preview] No.10054 del
>>10053
>I hate /pol/ and I'm making shit up about them
>but also muh kikes
Pick one.


Anonymous 10/29/2018 (Mon) 16:02:02 [Preview] No.10069 del
(10.37 KB 235x287 1532929063700.jpg)
>>10054
imagine having to strawman this bad.


Anonymous 11/02/2018 (Fri) 17:01:01 [Preview] No.10075 del
(57.15 KB 928x523 a.jpg)
>>10069
>strawmanning kikes while complaining about strawmanning kikes


Anonymous 11/02/2018 (Fri) 19:48:31 [Preview] No.10076 del
(1.90 MB 640x360 life.webm)
>>10075
>get's called kike
>ur strawmanning!!!!


Anonymous 11/11/2018 (Sun) 15:24:17 [Preview] No.10079 del
>>9991
Again, I promise not to spam any boards unless they are spamming pics of tranny dicks, CP or snuff that happen to cover the front page.

Example: Someone from /librejp/ recently posted a pic of an underaged nude girl (go there and you might find it), it came up on the front page. That was CP. So I went to the same thread and posted a few legal pics of clothed chicks and silly teen girls smiling for a camera aka "anti-spam". The CP went off the front page, and the legal pics popped up.

MY INTENT: I am simply doing endchan a service so they don't have to worry about being labeled a haven for CP & trashy porn. We are better than that. We should not stoop to that level of inhumane degenerate absurdity.


Anonymous 11/11/2018 (Sun) 21:45:27 [Preview] No.10080 del
>>10079
.....
spamming is a service?
seriously?
nothing against the rules for posting girls with dicks, idiot
you just dont like it and see yourself as the internet police
you could have just global reported that CP instead of spamming the board it was posted on you fuckin snake


Anonymous 11/15/2018 (Thu) 17:52:18 [Preview] No.10081 del
>>10080
It might not be "against the rules" to post tyranny porn, however it is very rude and its hard to believe its not spam when its intended to piss other people off. Especially considering there were automated bots of it.

I promise to leave anons alone as long as they are not belligerently rude. Personally I think the owner of endchan should update the rules and ban automated bots entirely. What makes auto-bots necessary?


Anonymous 11/15/2018 (Thu) 17:57:38 [Preview] No.10082 del
>>10080
A few clean, legal "anti-spam" pics of clothed women vs 1000s of tranny dick pics (or worse, CP)? I can hardly believe I'm the nuisance around here.


Anonymous 11/17/2018 (Sat) 21:33:37 [Preview] No.10083 del
>>10081
i lik tyranny porn


Anonymous 11/23/2018 (Fri) 11:51:06 [Preview] No.10091 del
>>10082
You're not the nuisance. Fuck those other assholes. Oh wait. They're already fucking man holes.


Anonymous 11/24/2018 (Sat) 03:13:47 [Preview] No.10096 del
>>9674
Would it be possible to have a compromise? How about privating all zero activity boards over deleting them outright. Keep the handful of boards who are active and still have new board creation, but make it a trial period and delete them or private them if they are abandoned. I understand the leeriness of scraping board creation but I also think that the admins need to be able to manage things and if endchan wants to grow it'll have to get a better image, looking like a wasteland isn't going to be good for the board either.

I haven't visited endchan in several months. Do to IRL stuff. It was a bit of a shock to see the site now. It'd be a shame to see this site go, especially with how bad 4chan is getting (yes, already is shit, but with the separation of the sfw and nsfw boards and how they are getting ready to sellout fully and become fully reddit) that could eventually effect 8chan as well. It'd be good keep this place up, as this is opportunity for growth in the future.


Balrog Board owner 11/26/2018 (Mon) 01:56:15 [Preview] No.10112 del
>>10096
If you scroll to somewhere around the middle of the thread the game plan is to nuke the zero-post boards and the boards that have had absolutely nothing happen since 2015. Then maybe delete some of the dead-but-not-totally-dead boards. Maybe. Restricting board creation isn't on the roadmap right now because people in the thread put in some good points in favor of leaving it unrestricted. Need to get some more arguing in and maybe do a trial of the exodus-board idea (without actually restricting board creation) before deciding either way. Right now we're doing stage 1 of fixing our shit (fixing our broken ass DB, which is why the site is slow as shit while we export) and generally getting the site back in shape to get ready for the oncoming shitstorms.


Balrog Board owner 11/26/2018 (Mon) 02:00:41 [Preview] No.10113 del
>>10112
>>10096
Also I don't think lynxchan can really "do" locking down entire boards without an addon, but I suppose it's worth a shot. We could also just publish a dump of the affected boards if that's the course we end up taking.


Anonymous 11/27/2018 (Tue) 02:16:31 [Preview] No.10116 del
>>10091
Epic Post xDDDD
>>10112
>Need to get some more arguing in
i can bring the 5 back for round 2 ITT if needed
or at the very least mil



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply