/operate/ - Endchan Operations

Let us know what's up

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(69.65 KB 490x500 milf.jpg)
Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 07:18:39 [Preview] No. 7420
Far out, can someone please control /pol/? They're the only thing on the whole overboard and it's all shitposts. Also, why is there a discord link at /home? Seriously though; /pol/ has become unbearably cancerous.


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 07:20:38 [Preview] No. 7421 del
>>7420
What is this, fucking 8ch? Look at this mess.


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 12:01:36 [Preview] No. 7424 del
Odiitime isn't gonna control another board because he's scared to intervene with another board moderation.


#sj7DAl 11/02/2017 (Thu) 17:23:49 [Preview] No. 7428 del
(3.19 MB 1348x827 asfasfasf.bmp)
>>7424
>because he's scared to intervene with another board moderation

first things first - the current /pol/ moderators are former vols elected by former BO (((ocolette))) (the guy who enabled known77IQ and (((RPD))))
(((ocolette))) then went missing and gave the baord to g_c and "adolf hitler" the board and started to censor it rapidly.

g_c AND "adolf hitler" HAVE NEVER CLAIMED THE BOARD!! THEY ARE NOT ENTITLED TO OWN IT.

ODILI IS NOT BOUND TO LET THEM TO RULE THE BOARD, THERE IS NOT RULE VIOLATION OF HE TAKES IT AWAY FORM THEM
additionally the current /pol/ moderation are openly censoring free speech and ruining /pol/. i also remind "adolf hitler" is a former shit poster, spammer and he is a traitor who backed (((RPD)))


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 17:30:59 [Preview] No. 7429 del
I think odiitime is mostly at iirc/discord so if we ask him if someone else can moderate /pol/ then we can see what can happen but I don't think he's gonna do anything because we've been yelling at /operate/ with him giving no response.


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 17:58:18 [Preview] No. 7433 del
(55.57 KB 453x421 HAHA.jpg)
>>7428
>this buttflustered he spams his shit across multiple threads
>>7430


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 01:50:24 [Preview] No. 7453 del
>>7428
>>7433
I couldn't care less about any of this drama shit. Realistically, I just want /pol/ to take it's meds. The chances of there being any real anonymous discussion of politics beyond the shitposting extravaganza that is 8/pol/ and co is near impossible. The way that these fags write their posts, abusing parenthesis, spacing and terribly edited images is cancer of the highest order of magnitude. Imagine how damaging serious and anonymous political discussions would be to governments and other systems of authority that abuse their power.


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 04:16:15 [Preview] No. 7454 del
>>7453
It'll never be like that because they requires them to think above the same shit they talk about day in and day out.


odilitime Board volunteer 11/03/2017 (Fri) 09:24:08 [Preview] No. 7456 del
>why is there a discord link at /home
because I put one there. It's not required for any one to use it, it's just for the ones that don't mind the bot net. The more ways to communicate with us the better and I already spend a large amount of time on discord.

>can someone please control /pol/?
No. We're a userboard site, make a new board.

I have 3 pol threads on my /operate/ first page. Do we need a containment thread? Expect more of these to be locked or deleted in the future.

>>7424
not really scared. I just don't think the administration should get involved with content moderation. It makes me sick to think 8/pol has it's fingers on end/pol but this is a userboard site. Easily fixed if people actually:
1. cared about this issue
2. worked together
3. no give a shit about the /pol brand

I will fully support an alternative pol board and do everything in my power to promote it but I won't post content. A board needs quality content to attract posters. Be the change you want to see and if your ideas have merit people will follow.

>>7428
please stop posting .BMPs, no one can read them

>>7429
correct.

EDIT: to not sound like a teenager
Edited last time by odilitime on 11/03/2017 (Fri) 09:25:52.


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 10:03:13 [Preview] No. 7457 del
>>7456
>I already spend a large amount of time on discord.
-12 respect.

I understand that you don't intervene in userboards, for good reason, but my issue is with how the overboard works. say there was a ton of spam or a great many threads made on one board, outweighing the other boards in new threads per hour/day; would it not be possible to limit these threads showing up on the overboard or maybe give anons the choice to choose what boards show up on the overboard? I'm personally against the hiding of threads as it can delude the users ability to judge a boards quality, create echo chambers of discussion and form cliques. I guess what I'm asking is if I can remove /pol/ from the overboard, if it's going to stay like 8/pol/.

I've never owned a board but have been seriously thinking of making some kind of politic or modern history board. Not sure how to get traffic for that sort of thing though. Sorry for making a thread like this, I wasn't aware there were others like it here. I remember replying to some threads and being surprised that they were created on /pol/ at what seems like a long time ago now.


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 10:59:40 [Preview] No. 7458 del
>>7453
>le terribly edited images
<being this new
Image macroes have been around since before the chans.


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 12:37:24 [Preview] No. 7460 del
(516.45 KB 1509x2244 20.jpg)
/pol/ is now spamming themselves to get the top board and gloating about it. They should really be deleted.


Anonymous 11/03/2017 (Fri) 12:55:13 [Preview] No. 7461 del
>>7458
Yeah it really shows the maturity and validity of an anons point when they edit an image for two seconds instead using research and analysis to reference his arguments. They're funny sometimes, I'll give you that, but just because something's been around before the 'chans' doesn't mean I'm not going to criticize the lack of effort and understanding in what is a homogeneous post full of informal fallacy's. You can spot a typical /pol/ poster easier than a redditor and just as I dismiss political images posted on social media, so do I dismiss the Images posted by /pol/ anons and anyone else that seems to think they're right because they made an image to confirm their bias.
>>7460
What a joke, are they not satisfied with planting their flag at the top of 8ch's tyre fire?
>>7454
It really is the same shit all the time. 8chans /his/ used to be a shining beacon of hope but now all it's threads that were supposed to be about they study of fucking history are full of arguments about genetics. Nothing made me more frustrated than when I looked at 8chs top boards and saw /v/ in between /pol/ and /leftypol/; it explained everything.


#sj7DAl 11/03/2017 (Fri) 13:13:44 [Preview] No. 7463 del
(239.53 KB 1348x806 asfasfasf.jpg)
>>7456
Why couldn't you reply just right away? It would have prevented everything from escalation.


>A board needs quality content to attract posters
This precisely isn't possible on the current pol. The pol moderator bans everyone who he degrees with and openly denies free speech no different from the former BO. Additionally he spams each singe thread with his opinions, sometimes without even disabling his trip-code. On the controversy he and the BO are letting up shit posts from spammers to blame actions on a "scapegoat boogeymen", like he did with the recent old thread when he deleted it because it contained information about him and blamed it on "D&C" and spam.
> .BMPs screenshot
(Accidentally saved it as a bmp instead of jpeg.)
In the pol/meta he is pretending to be the good guy, but I have this old screenshot where I caught him with his pants down and it shows who he really is. While he was passive on our attempts to expose pol, I posted this picture and he became anxious and started to reply.


Odili, if you right away would have taken the courage to tell your stance on pol (or whats left of it) and if you would reply to concerns of endchans visitors, even after things like the ggrevolt ownership, things would have went much smoother and people would trust you more.

>2. worked together
Well, you are part of it. We are expressing our concerns but you ignored us for whatever reason.
Look at me, even through I don't like guys like doonoo (who is with (((RPD)))), and even after he attacked me for no reason, I still stood there and explained to him my views and that I support free speech.

>1. cared about this issue
People do care. This is why you have so many people telling you about pol is getting a)censored and b) mod are becoming unbearable

>3. no give a shit about the /pol brand
pol is trending. There is simply nothing anyone can do about it, people come from b8chan and they go here to visit a "better" version of pol because their threads were deleted and they ended up banned for "D&C". instead they find themselves on an even worse pol and get banned again with the explanation of "D&C".


#sj7DAl 11/03/2017 (Fri) 13:34:45 [Preview] No. 7465 del
(156.63 KB 1295x668 skvzh4qb.jpg)
>>7461
>370 normies 1st

This is how big current end/pol/ is without spammers (screenshot taken few days ago)

Now consider at least 2 out of the 6 people who posted that day are still shit posters or spammers


odilitime Board volunteer 11/04/2017 (Sat) 08:35:32 [Preview] No. 7471 del
>>7457
Implemented

EDIT: deleted reply to #sj7DAl
Edited last time by odilitime on 11/04/2017 (Sat) 10:53:06.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply