/news/ - News

News & Current Events + Happenings

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

News & Current Events + Happenings
/news/ deserves actual news. Declaring agendas are not news. Do not post trolling bait threads.
Post quality threads only, and it's voluntary to crosspost them to /pol/
Never mandatory.

Expand All Images

Trump's DOJ Outlaws Bump Stocks Reader 03/13/2018 (Tue) 21:38:14 Id: f2a4ee [Preview] No. 7258
On Monday, President Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) announced they are declaring bump stocks to be “machine guns” in order to ban them.

A bump stock is not a firearm; it is a firearm accessory. The DOJ is declaring them to be “machine guns” in order to ban them.

A March 12 press release put forth by the DOJ, says:

The Department of Justice is supporting President Trump’s absolute commitment to ensuring the safety and security of every American by submitting to the Office of Management and Budget a proposed regulation to clarify that bump stock type devices are machine guns under federal law, which will effectively ban the manufacture, sale or possession of these devices.

The push to ban bump stocks began in Congress almost immediately after the October 1, 2017, Las Vegas attack. On October 6 — just five days after the attack — Breitbart News reported that 11 cuckservatives supported some action on bump stocks. Those 11 were:

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) – On October 5, Speaker Ryan said legislation banning bump stocks is “clearly” something Congress must look into.
Rep. Bill Flores (R-TX) – Flores admitted he did not know what a bump stock was until this week, yet he says he looked into them and is backing gun control via a ban on them.
Rep. Kevin Yoder (R-KS) – On October 5, Yoder put out a press release in which he inaccurately claimed that bump stocks “convert legal firearms into an automatic weapon.” They do not. They are an accessory, not a conversion device. It is unclear whether Rep. Yoder used the term “ convert” in a colloquial or technical sense, but previously, under the Obama Administration, Rick Vasquez, former acting chief of the Firearms Technology Branch of the ATF, told USA Today that bump stocks were legalized because they are “an accessory, not a conversion device.”They do not. They are an accessory, not a conversion device. Nevertheless, Yoder supports gun control via restoring the ban on the devices.
Rep. Mark Meadow (R-NC) – Meadows is the head of the House Freedom Caucus and according to the New York Times, he “would be open to considering a bill” that reinstates a ban on bump stocks.
Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) – NYT reports that Curbelo is drafting gun control legislation to banbump stocks “conversion kits.” (apparently referring to bump stocks as “conversion kits”) – which the Obama Administration said they were not.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) – On October 4, Breitbart News reported that Cornyn said a hearing on a bump stock ban would be “worthwhile.”
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) – On October 4, Politico reported that Johnson said, “Automatic weapons are illegal. If … [the bump stock] facilitates that, to me it would be subject to the same ban. If that actually gets on the Senate floor, I’d vote for it.”
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) – NYT reports Graham “would be open to considering legislation on bump stocks.”
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) – NYT reports Hatch “would be open to considering legislation on bump stocks.”
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) – Rubio said he and his colleagues “would always be open” to addressing “vulnerabilities in federal law.”
Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) – During an October 5 on CBS This Morning, Kasish was asked if he supported gun control via a ban on bump stocks and he said, “Oh, yeah of course.”

But the American people did not rally behind a bump stock ban, and the legislative pushes soon faded awaybut a push for the ATF to ban bump stocks by regulation remained alive. but hopes for regulatory gun control, via the ATF, stayed alive. For example, the NRA encouraged Congress not to pass new laws while, at the same time, encouraging the ATF to re-evaluate bump stocks. The NRA’s position was that “devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations.”


Reader 03/13/2018 (Tue) 22:01:10 Id: df31d4 [Preview] No.7259 del
If they can declare anything they damn well please a "machine gun" then might as well declare any semi-automatic weapon one and be done with it.

Although if you want to get really technical, every gun is a "machine" whether it is semi-automatic or not.

Reader 03/14/2018 (Wed) 16:32:49 Id: 61fd3b [Preview] No.7267 del
Some people have warned this is only the first step, they'll label accessories to semi-autos as "fully auto conversions" thus outlawing any semi-auto with an accessory. But remember most accessories can be taken off at any time. Not that I support this ban, I clearly do not.

The bump stock ban itself does not worry me because 1) most gun owners do not have them or use them and 2) bump stocks are extremely difficult to accurately fire with. It is not something you'd rely on for self defense or hunting. More or less just for having some fun on a range and showing off. What worries me is this is only the first step for these bureaucrats, as we all know bureaucrats will NEVER be satisfied until they have banned every last fucking gun from every last citizen, and they still won't be satisfied because next they'll disarm the police (just like in Britain).

My recommendation would be to lay low if you have these accessories, don't tell anyone about them, don't post pictures of them, etc. That is how you are likely to be busted is to flaunt them.

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply