/kc/ - Krautchan

diaspora of krautchan unite

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 100.00 MB

Max files: 4

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images

(15.73 KB 502x505 gothgangxd.PNG)
Bernd 03/26/2018 (Mon) 19:02:19 [Preview] No. 15315
uses twitter for a year

sage Bernd 03/26/2018 (Mon) 19:15:58 [Preview] No.15318 del
There's been a very pleasant lack of "political discussions" on this board so far and it would be nice if it could stay that way.

Bernd 03/26/2018 (Mon) 19:26:02 [Preview] No.15319 del
>lack of "political discussions"
We have two long threads so far tho, also the news is semi related. And maybe Syria. But otherwise there are many topics to discuss and we aren't a politics centered board so yeah it could seem we lack politics.

Previously our little community had such thread with different tests and so on. I don't remember anyone scoring much on the Authoritarian axis.
Umm, if you're interested you could check the other threads (via Catalog), one is a Catalan themed but general politics thread, the other is about elections and the relation of votes and certain properties of the countries which can be translate onto maps. For example I would interested in reading about Austria and how the different regions vote there.

sage because off topic Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 04:57:35 [Preview] No.15350 del
We've had multiple threads that have had political discussions, if you don't like them go to /int/.

Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 13:09:20 [Preview] No.15365 del
Usually with that test I'm put right in the middle so I guess I'm a RADICAL CENTRIST, though personally I'd probably call myself a libertarian.
Political discussions aren't inherently bad imo, as long as they stay civil without any /pol/ tier bullshit.

Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 15:13:47 [Preview] No.15371 del
The only time they lose civility and rationality is when some crypto kike LIKE YOU COMES OUT OF THE WOODWORK!

Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 16:45:37 [Preview] No.15377 del
>Usually with that test I'm put right in the middle
t. been called fascist and nationalist during my life

Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 16:51:45 [Preview] No.15378 del
(55.20 KB 297x365 1480370452513-1.jpg)

Bernd 03/27/2018 (Tue) 17:42:21 [Preview] No.15379 del
Stop bullying Jezza.

Bernd 03/28/2018 (Wed) 00:45:51 [Preview] No.15396 del
roy bottom right

Bernd 03/28/2018 (Wed) 13:28:38 [Preview] No.15401 del
(43.39 KB 720x540 1467654781345.jpg)
I was actually tempted to vote Corbyn last year just for the bants, he's top tier meme material

Bernd 03/28/2018 (Wed) 16:57:57 [Preview] No.15404 del
(112.84 KB 1096x1642 many_jew.jpg)
He seems to trigger the Blairites who want him gone, but Jezza has a comfy majority of the common party members behind him.

Bernd 03/30/2018 (Fri) 13:45:51 [Preview] No.15450 del
(17.27 KB 480x400 loligoth1488.png)
<average Antifa faggot

Bernd 03/30/2018 (Fri) 13:57:41 [Preview] No.15451 del
Wrong! Antifa faggots would be left on the authoritarian side. Remember, they attack people for free speech. Libertarians don't do that because they agree with the right to peaceful dissent. Antifa is very authoritarian and they love being jackbooted thugs for political agendas.

Bernd 03/30/2018 (Fri) 14:00:01 [Preview] No.15452 del
That status would be the typical beatnik back in the 60s. You likely don't know the kind but I remember them well. Very passive people, would not hurt a fly.

Bernd 03/30/2018 (Fri) 14:08:02 [Preview] No.15453 del
(17.40 KB 480x400 antifafag.png)
But they're anarchists too, and that's radical libertarianism. I'd say this is a more accurate chart.

Bernd 03/31/2018 (Sat) 06:37:13 [Preview] No.15475 del
(23.95 KB 512x384 Al_NO_MA'AM.jpg)
Using exclamation points and bold text for emotional emphasis is feminine style manipulative behavior. Why don't you go see how many times in a row you can type the word "very" before you lose your train of thought. Two is average for females, best of luck, ma'am

Bernd 03/31/2018 (Sat) 09:14:23 [Preview] No.15483 del
(210.06 KB 365x345 actually.jpg)
(85.58 KB 500x500 fascists.jpg)
(26.97 KB 600x400 retarded.png)
>2nd pic

But when they make such comp-asses like pic #3... I highly doubt anything is legit on their site.

Bernd 03/31/2018 (Sat) 14:06:51 [Preview] No.15488 del
(298.61 KB 674x754 1458683645011.png)
>But they're anarchists too, and that's radical libertarianism.
Not when it's anarcho-gommunism.

Bernd 03/31/2018 (Sat) 15:16:41 [Preview] No.15489 del
Anarchists are the honest ones. Commies and libertarians just want to pretend that they are the ones whose social engineering model just feeds a magically self-correcting feedback loop, because theirs is finally the correct one.

Properly checking an ideology reveals that sticking to ideology as your moral compass will degrade society. It's irrelevant that anarchists will then falsely justify it as a good thing, at least their philosophy is structurally intact. That's one thing 'Straya gets wrong, he jus assigns philosophy to Antifa and calls it authoritarian when the movement is actually liberally funded scheme running on emotions, not philosophy. Antifa is an economical structure, like a mom'n'pop corner store.

Bernd 03/31/2018 (Sat) 23:52:08 [Preview] No.15495 del
(66.73 KB 752x1668 left anarchism.png)
Which ones? Ancaps? Ancoms? Because Anarcho-communism is wildly inconsistent.

Bernd 04/02/2018 (Mon) 11:30:34 [Preview] No.15526 del
>If the system does not allow voluntary opt-out, the system is authoritarian.
Couldn't the same be said for any form of Anarchism? Things like local militias and warlords are often discussed when talking about Anarchy, but maybe I'm basing my opinion too much on epic AnCap menes.

Bernd 04/13/2018 (Fri) 21:52:41 [Preview] No.15910 del
what social constraints and/or laws do you wish to realize your ideal world?

Bernd 04/14/2018 (Sat) 02:44:23 [Preview] No.15915 del
Collectivism is seen here as inherently authoritarian, whereas individualism would count as an out.

The evidence is presented from the point of view of inherently authoritarian individualism, so it doesn't really hold water. This is because an anarchist individual would just hold the deed to his property, but asserting the political theory that justifies an increase in its value would have to be enforced by using the Anarcho-Individualist's authority, making him the non-anarchist of his own island nation.

Rather, the writeup assumes that being an individual exempts an individual from counting as an authority even if he is capable of committing any action of an authority. Collective is seen as naturally more bound by some form of responsibility towards its outsiders that is not justified. Without this mistake, an anarchist commune would count as a force of nature towards the Anarcho-Individualist and not sustain moral agency within his framework, although it does within its own.

Bernd 04/15/2018 (Sun) 08:08:55 [Preview] No.15951 del
I think that image fails right at the beginning when defines authority as violent coercion.

Bernd 04/15/2018 (Sun) 12:59:36 [Preview] No.15953 del
You can grant it some semantics. It's about violent coercion in any case, same with collectivism that it calls leftism.

Bernd 04/15/2018 (Sun) 13:04:13 [Preview] No.15954 del
A typical mistake is to call "ownership" a passive action when it still entails "taking back what's yours", just to wriggle out of your own non-aggression policy when it suits you. In true non-aggression you just get to own even the fact that somebody else is using your shit. Otherwise it's like blaming gravity for stealing your space house.

Bernd 04/17/2018 (Tue) 09:30:33 [Preview] No.16012 del
Seize the memes of production.
t. Garl Marx
Today is the 200th birthday of Engel's ghostwriter. And let's not forget, real communism has never been tired.

Bernd 04/17/2018 (Tue) 12:47:04 [Preview] No.16014 del
(56.54 KB 595x335 1467663645715.jpg)
>real communism has never been tired.

Bernd 04/17/2018 (Tue) 15:13:24 [Preview] No.16015 del
>Garl Margus

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 11:00:53 [Preview] No.16031 del
(401.73 KB 1600x1600 C18.jpeg)
in England you allready have bolchewism - you work for your masonic kikemasters and your fukken niggers

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 13:11:37 [Preview] No.16037 del
I don't get that pic, why does it have Islam and homosex multiple times?

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 14:06:20 [Preview] No.16039 del
Both images are for colorblind people, I guess.

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 15:12:08 [Preview] No.16041 del
>masons illuminati khazars no good
>but skull'n bones totenkopf is ok

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 16:45:24 [Preview] No.16043 del
Shia and Sunni?

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 16:48:25 [Preview] No.16044 del
to show that they are doubly undesirable

Bernd 04/18/2018 (Wed) 18:13:54 [Preview] No.16052 del

Bernd 04/19/2018 (Thu) 13:00:10 [Preview] No.16060 del
>implying it isn't better to encourage them both and watch as they remove each other

Bernd 04/19/2018 (Thu) 23:11:15 [Preview] No.16079 del
You're probably thinking of authority in terms of social relations and organization, which is a valid way to use that word, but anarchists are chiefly concerned about coercion.

Semantics aside, that pic just makes a simple argument. It merely points out that
>as any other anarchists, ancoms claim that their system involves no coercion
>ancom societies necessarily require coercion
>thus, ancoms simultaneously stand against coercion and propose it as part of their own system

>>15915 then shows a classic counterargument: that enforcing property rights, too, requires using violence. Ancaps then respond that this violence, which they deem the only acceptable form of violence, is legitimate because it's merely a form of self-defence.
I don't know what's the ancom justification for their own use of coercion, though; pretending that there's no coercion doesn't cut it because forcing people at gunpoint to stay at your commune is in no way "anarchist" or "libertarian" in the pure sense of these words. They may, however, justify it in the same vein as ancaps by explaining it as a form of legitimate violence, probably by describing it as a rightful resistance against inherently authoritarian/hierachical/coercive wageslavery, money and surplus value extraction.

Bernd 04/19/2018 (Thu) 23:22:10 [Preview] No.16082 del
>implying you need the state for defense
Good goyim

Bernd 04/19/2018 (Thu) 23:57:14 [Preview] No.16085 del
I remember a thread on 8/liberty/ discussing how an anarchist society could fight off a state's invasion. Guerilla warfare, it was argued, could drive away the enemy, and there are convincing historical precedents to believe so.
This, however, has the following caveats: it requires a population comitted to maintaining their libertarian social order, damages the country (an inevitable side effect of guerilla warfare) and offers far less of a deterrent than having a regular army.

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply