10/19/2018 (Fri) 13:31:17
For clarity, I didn't post >>2926
that was someone else.>No, it was a loaded question that cannot be answered with one answer without dissecting it all apart in answering the questions one by one,
That's alright.>If you agree with the OP for example
Ironically, I am OP. I know that I'm not in the position to create a thread like this and the information posted and images attached might well be disinformation I nevertheless posted it to start a conversation on the subject.
Anyway, thanks for you useful information