That's been known for a long time.

She truly has gone Full SJW:

http://theralphretort.com/loony-louise-mensch-accuses-vice-journalist-of-treason-for-criticizing-hillary-clinton-10016016/

BAMP

bump

bump

>>11409
U.S. is no longer reliant on foreign oil from the middle east thanks to Fracking. The petro-dollar is not the primary reason why Neocon's cared about the Middle East. It was all about Oded Yinon plan (For a greater Israel), giving Cronies in the military industrial complex building contracts and blocking Russia from breaking containment (pic related). that said, WW3 is most likely defiantly going to happen if Hillary.

BAMP

Nice!

"accidentally"

I wonder.

>>11629
Just a heads up CTR shills are releasing a boat load of false flag information. Confirm everything.

WE WILL WE Wuz Kangz
WE WUZ WE WUZ Kangz

=================
NOTE: When using this line of argument be rude and Crude and Violent to illustrate this point, Don't lay it out all at once just slowly attack the metaphysics. Show that no man is obligated to respect the NAP and that No reasonable Man ought to respect it as a moral principle. Even if I were polite. Islamist is certainly not obligated to respect your liberalism.
=================

Use other argument's hidden in provocative rhetoric as well that a discerning mind might pick up on if they have actually taken the time to analyze the ideas of libertarianism.

=================
NOTE: I used to be a Marxist, but then realized it was Flawed (The clue was, the globalist capitalist where advocating Marx and supporting Socialist policy also supported and sweatshop labor for example. The 1% where ironically invested in teaching Marxim) so I moved to being a Liberal, but liberalism was flawed so I moved to being a Libertarian (Classical Liberal) (because I agreed with FA Hayek and the Critique of the Federal Reserve Banking System and generally support some brand of Laissez Faire trade and market competition) , but now I realize that is flawed as well.
=================

In fact many of the issues with Modernity come down to this lack of Standards, an inability to Know Truth and measure Right From Wrong. There are a few Libertarians who Understand this and I respect them. Tom Woods being a Catholic is one such example of a Libertarian who is respectable, Same can be said for Hans Hermann Hoppe. They are people who question their own Libertarian philosophy to hopefully make it stronger and understand the the failings of Lolbertism.

Many people who are liberals don't understand this critique because it also attacks those who are further left then Cultural Lolberts (in other words it is an attack on SJW's, and fedora tippers too). It just is a sad ironic result of libertarian/liberal populism and a example of rational ignorance in effect. The idea it to get people to consider far more Right Wing moral Philosophy seriously then they ever had in the past. Maybe I will find faults in this as well but one first need to understand a system before you see the hole in it and for the Liberal (No matter what brand of liberalism), their is a unspoken demand that Metaphysics be off the table, or what John Rawls call's "common reason", or what is more contemporary known as Political Correctness. Liberalism was born from the schism in the church. Protestants and Catholics agreeing to disagree on matters for the Higher Law, all modernity was spawned form this schism. Now we have SJW's who cry "Feels is Reals", and that logically follows from this schism and rejection of Objective Truth and Order. A rejection of Logos (greek).

=================

Framing debate in only Economics and Policy is a brand of Political Correctness and once you adopt this policy and its born from subjective morality then you open pandora's box. This is why Lolberts like Jeffrey Tucker, at the end of the day can share Hillary Clinton's dream of "hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders". In this regard Lolberts like Tucker are Just another brand of Globalist. Conversely Lew Rockwell might argue against Tucker on the grounds of Property Rights but his side of the debate is hamstrung by not being free to go beyond the ethics of economics (Property Rights). Even as sophisticated intellectually honest would admit Property needs to be protected by Force form aggression, which is why Libertarians typically advocate for Gun Ownership. The Anarchist Marxist merely takes it one step future and reject all force, even force used in justified self defense because force produces inequality and inequality produces hierarchy.
=================
Also see: The Refutation of Libertarianism by Greg Johnson
http://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/the-refutation-of-libertarianism/

t.blog_post

Almost done... Thank goodness!
MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN! KANYE 2020!

>>11059
Just like the 6 garillion. Never forget.

>>11013
Fucking Christ, I watched the whole thing. That easily could have been half as long. He repeated himself for twenty fucking minutes about the god damn "chambers" shown in The Reader. It was like listening to the ramblings of an old man who loses his train of thought and completely changes subject.

Anymore salt from this?

Are people getting sick of this kvetching yet?
From kikepedia
>Based on the book History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier, Denial recounts Deborah E. Lipstadt’s legal battle for her historical interpretation against David Irving, who accused her of libel when she declared him a Holocaust denier. In the English legal system, in cases of libel, the burden of proof is on the accused, therefore it was up to Lipstadt and her legal team, led by Richard Rampton, to prove the essential truth that the Holocaust occurred.

We're almost done sliding this garbage board to be quite honest.

https://conservativedailypost.com/breaking-trump-moves-to-file-charges-against-clinton/
https://archive.is/IVg4N
WEW.

Welcome to DOGOGOSSIO0DZZ09IUDPOLKK,.,.,.sd,vldoizdvskjldsm.,.,