I live in a country with seasons. Your 200 mile range in commiefornia translates to 50 miles with the lights, wipers and heater on.

>>20457
>Why wouldn't you buy an electric car now?

Because nobody makes an electric car now. Instead what they make are Facebook apps on wheels. If I could buy an electric car instead of a drive-by-wire data-harvesting wifi-enabled Internet-of-Things rolling turd then they'd definitely be in the running for my next car.

The first Leaf was a cheap hatchback with a battery pack and an electric motor bolted in. They got it right the first time! Make more of those, simplify, keep going down that route... but nooooooo, now they cost $40,000 and have phones and Sirius XM and maps and a bunch of other stuff that has nothing to do with just being four wheels driven by electric motors and a battery pack.

My ideal electric car is little more than a golf cart. It has rack-and-pinion steering, hydraulic brakes, a mechanical ON/OFF switch, and no touchscreen, wifi capability, or neural nets.

I know two guys, one owns a Leaf and the other a Tesla. Weather here sucks. You can't drive until you can see through the front windshield, and people who don't live in areas where you have to spend ten or fifteen minutes every morning dealing with that don't really understand. They both say the heater, a much bigger draw than lights, eats about 25-30% of their range. It's not a show-stopper for electric cars. As much as I rant against contemporary electric car design, I have to admit that the electromechanics have gotten good. The motors, batteries, regenerative braking, motor controllers, charging systems, performance, and range are good. Both are nice cars and they work fine. It's the lack of a basic inexpensive car with all the irrelevant crap removed that keeps me from buying one. I don't want the vast majority of internal combustion vehicle offerings for the same reason. I like to hope that the market is still young and that manufactures will come to their senses about what is actually needed, but since most of them don't even bother testing what their own web sites look like with javascript disabled, they're probably going to keep screwing up their cars in similar fashion.

>>20463
Absolutely 100% true. Not only do they turn vehicles into botnets for Big Tech and government eavesdropping, they are ridiculously overpriced as well. Its like choosing between a $2,000 iPhone or a $40 flip phone. I'll take the flip phone, because all I want is a functional phone to make calls. I don't need or care about all the extra bloatware.

I own a 1989 4x4 dodge pickup truck with a 360 engine and ain't no way would I ever give that bad boy up to buy some ugly yuppie faggot big-tech-govt infested spy-mobile.

>>20458
>egirls
>sadbois
i'll pass

>>20459
thats okay fren, i'm sure youre gay anyway :)

>>20461
says discord user

🚀

>>20219
Get TOR and other alt-web interfaces.
Also no JS.
If you don't have that, then why bother?

pretty much everyone's an uncle tom if they want to monetize shit on the internet at this point.

>>20436
wew, he said nigger... how shocking, right?

>>20438
welp don't take much these days. Twitch is really inconsistent with bans though.

>>20439
isn't twitch banning everyone except sluts?

>>20440
Trying to

>>20423
>God probably would have sabotaged the sprinklers anyway. I'm not sure if He is finally getting annoyed with all the buttfucking of little boys by His priests
When you say it rabbi shlomo shekelstein it must be true, they did write it in the papers too and never would lie to us!

>>20426
Sorry if I tore off a scab there, dude! It wasn't your fault and you have nothing to be ashamed of.

>>20416
Will this accuse me of flooding too?

Scientists have established a link between brain damage and fundamentalism.
https://www.salon.com/2019/04/17/scientists-establish-a-link-between-religious-fundamentalism-and-brain-damage_partner/

>>20435
>salon.com
But protestants are shit, so I'll believe it.

hot

reminds me of how new yorkers react to nothing

https://breakroomirwin.com/

>impying
foh nugguh

>>19645
Seems like a way to take advantage of people's anger for their money. Would this actually help people in some way or form? I'd say not really, it'd prolly just extend the time until they "explode" from their built up frustration and anger, but that would be pretty much it. It could turn into a cycle where people will go to "release" and lash out and afterwards wait until they feel like doing it all over again because they've never really solved their underlying problems. theoritically an endless cycle of spending money to make themselves feel better.

Not only do I see it as an endless waste of time, energy, and money, I also see it as a bad habit. it enables and encourages people to turn to aggression when things don't go their way, when their problems overwhelm them. Instead of seeking out solutions to their problems which causes them stress, pain, etc. they will escape to sensual pleasures.

Chinese women also just throw trash in an elevator.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=YdxGoFopimE [Embed]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ldy4LOgvUCw [Embed]
China mechanical onahole