/tech/ - Technology

A Technical Place

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


Tor: help test next-gen onions Anonymous 09/20/2017 (Wed) 22:15:51 [Preview] No. 11219
>this is an email for technical people who want to help us test next-gen onion services.
>The current status of next-gen onion services (aka prop224) is that they have been fully merged into upstream tor and have also been released as part of tor-0.3.2.1-alpha
>We are still in a alpha testing phase and when we get more confident about the code we plan to release a blog post (probs during October).

https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2017-September/001449.html


Anonymous 09/22/2017 (Fri) 01:45:59 [Preview] No. 11247 del
(4.79 MB 480x360 floppy.webm)
>>11219
>this is an email for technical people who want to help us test next-gen onion services.
>technical people

Welp, you've cast your seed on infertile ground, I'm afraid. Apart from me and Endwall, it's mostly brainlets here.

I'll fire up a VPS and do some testing, though. I've been anticipating the v3 hidden services for some time.


Anonymous 09/22/2017 (Fri) 02:15:36 [Preview] No. 11248 del
>>11247
<Apart from me and Endwall, it's mostly brainlets here.
>look how special we are!
You are in an anonymous community and do an argument as if you know everyone that uses this anonymous community. Good job. Very coherent.
>people who don't agree with me don't have a brain!!!11!
In an discussion community what matters is not if you're more intelligence or how important you are. What matters is the discussion and the possible conclusions from it. Else, you just fall in an eristic dialectics (as Schopenhauer would say), as we are doing now, it seems.
This is not the thread to discuss it. There's a meta thread on sticky for this purpose.


Anonymous 09/22/2017 (Fri) 02:31:34 [Preview] No. 11249 del
(221.98 KB 480x360 geta9front.webm)
>>11248
>Very coherent.
O irony!

>What matters is the discussion and the possible conclusions from it
The discussion here is largely semi-literate, ill-reasoned, and poor in technical understanding. Exhibit 1: your post.


Anonymous 09/22/2017 (Fri) 03:16:20 [Preview] No. 11250 del
>>11249
>O irony!
Indeed.
I've said it myself, but you don't want to look at what you already think as important for you (confirmation bias):
>Else, you just fall in an eristic dialectics (as Schopenhauer would say), as we are doing now, it seems.
>as we are doing now, it seems.


Anonymous 09/23/2017 (Sat) 17:02:08 [Preview] No. 11275 del
> gff4ixq3takworeuhkubzz4xh2ulytoct4xrpazkiykhupalqlo53ryd.onion
omfg


Anonymous 09/23/2017 (Sat) 22:42:02 [Preview] No. 11278 del
>>11275
Freedom isn't free.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply