/tech/ - Technology

Brought to you by archive.org

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


Suddenly Bruce Perens doesn't want to talk to me. Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 06:38:30 [Preview] No. 10386
Suddenly Bruce Perens doesn't want to talk to me.

What happened? This was out of the blue:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html

>OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage him.
>
> Bruce


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 06:41:31 [Preview] No. 10387 del
Tell me what's going on.

This was from a discussion on the GRSecurity situation.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 07:46:47 [Preview] No. 10388 del
(58.71 KB 1280x800 anime1493847407959.jpg)
My response:

>OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage him.
>
> Bruce

For what reason? Has some libel been spread about me? Who are you saying OK to? It seems that you are putting me in a false negative light now for what reason is there for blocking me? I have not been combative towards you and have simply explained the law as I see it regarding this situation, as-well as anticipating possible defenses that will have to be argued against.

I don't see why, for that, one would block me.
So there must be some libelous statement made by someone else that you are responding to. I wonder what was said...

Anyway, yes I am a licensed attorney. Yes I have answered the questions and ideas raised as best as I can, and yes I have informed those in this discussion, as-well as those reading it, as to the dangers of failing to bring a case within a reasonable amount of time once a cause of action has matured.

I have done my due diligence.

If you do not bring a case within the required time period, at law, you lose the right to seek damages. If you do not bring a case within a reasonable time and sit on your rights then equitable remedies also will be barred by laches.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 07:52:27 [Preview] No. 10389 del
Hey mikee, I wondered if you were going to pursue this, you were very outspoken in that thread on here. Why do you bother with the Debian mailing lists? You should know not to waste your time with them when they refused to package CEA. I think they hate you.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 07:52:45 [Preview] No. 10390 del
Response 2:

Imprisonment for contempt of court is not per-se a criminal matter. It is a situation where one can, at any time, comply with the court's request and regain one's liberty.

Cases involving repeated imprisonment for contempt of court include most often failure to pay a payment in a domestic matter (child support), as-well as increasingly failure to disburse funds in an action related to debt collection. Neither of such cases are matters of criminal law.

Your assertion that I am conflating the two is incorrect.

I gave it as an example to head off the idea that a court would look fondly on a plaintiff that stat on his rights and then attempted to head off a latches defense by claiming he could not afford council. Such is not a legal or physical impairment that a court would likely accept in most jurisdictions.

Why you now block me I do not know.

Give examples of a court in Pennsylvania (where Open Source Security is incorporated and has it's head office) where a latches defense failed because the plaintiff alleged that when he should have commenced an action he was short of funding.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 07:54:21 [Preview] No. 10391 del
>>61383507
> He found out that you were a cis white male

Do you think someone tipped him off that I feel that Hans Reiser did nothing wrong, and that I support the book of Deuteronomy, especially Deuteronomy chapter 22 verse 28-29 (as written in hebrew) and am infavor of men taking young girls as brides (as allowed by the God of the Old Testament) am not a fan of women's rights, etc?

He was listening to me (for over a week), posted this:
https://perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

after my explanation of the law

which became this slashdot story (in which he comments):

https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-perens-warns-grsecurity-breaches-the-linux-kernels-gpl-license


And then suddenly an hour or two ago, poof,

These are the people that were cc'd
Cc rms@gnu.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org, Eric Raymond, moglen@columbia.eduAdd contact


Which one do you think caused this?

I suspect ESR myself...
Your thoughts?


Do you think he'll now issue a retraction of his article, even though my understanding of the law is correct?


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 07:59:52 [Preview] No. 10392 del
(144.92 KB 702x397 anim1497769782220.png)
>>10389
>Hey mikee, I wondered if you were going to pursue this, you were very outspoken in that thread on here. Why do you bother with the Debian mailing lists? You should know not to waste your time with them when they refused to package CEA. I think they hate you.

This was in a conversation directly with Bruce Perens with the debian list, RMS, etc Carbon Copy'd.

(I always do that because even though my emails are blocked within a day, my messages still get through in the > 'd replies and thus the conversation is backed up even if I lose access to the mail.)

He was talking to me for over a week and listening to my legal advice.

This induced him to write this:
https://perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

Which was then posted to slashdot as:
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-perens-warns-grsecurity-breaches-the-linux-kernels-gpl-license

I see some of the language from my emails in Bruce's post (maybe we should archive.is it incase whatever caused him to stop talking to me suddenly...)

(Also I was also talking to the free software conservancy, RMS was talking to Bruce also due to my efforts, etc.)


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 08:03:58 [Preview] No. 10393 del
>>10392
It's clear someone got to him, my best guess is some feminist from Debian contacted him. Such a shame.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 08:04:58 [Preview] No. 10394 del
https://archive.fo/g9n3g

I also sent him the Stable Patch Access Agreement from GRSecurity as a PDF, which he didn't have before, where they put it in writing:

>"Notwithstanding these rights and obligations, the User acknowledges that redistribution of the provided stable patches or changelogs outside of the explicit obligations under the GPL to User's customers will result in termination of access to future updates of grsecurity stable patches and changelogs."


Which he then used to argue against grsecurity's position in the slashdot comments.

So: I explained the law to everyone that I could.
I explained how GRSecurity is violating the terms of the license grant from Linus and the rest.
I explained surrounding areas of law (verbal agreements, course of business dealing, adding terms that way)... and then it was discovered that GRSecurity put their additional restrictions in writing so I:
Supplied Bruce with that material too.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 08:10:35 [Preview] No. 10396 del
>>10393
>It's clear someone got to him, my best guess is some feminist from Debian contacted him. Such a shame.

I noticed that he was bad mouthing Han's Reiser in the slashdot comments and was saying he was sad Reiser killed Nina after she: had sex with Hans' friend (adultery), divorced Hans (man is ba'al; overlord, woman cannot leave her master), took his house, took his kids, etc.

Hans is absolutely Justified in executing Nina Reiser for this. It says it right there in Deuteronomy, chapter 22. (I'm glad Hans' sticks to his guns and just says "She was a bad infulence": looks like he hasn't abandoned God infavor of pro-women's rights Jesus)

He did nothing wrong. Bruce and other guys are carrying on like he's a terrible murderer (his killing is not a murder as per Deuteronomy, just a justified required slaying)

But even if he disagrees and hates the God of the Old Testament, what does that have to do with my correct interpretation of the law or this GRSecurity situation.

Why is it that these Free Software people put WOMEN first and everything else last?


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 08:17:41 [Preview] No. 10397 del
>>10393
>It's clear someone got to him, my best guess is some feminist from Debian contacted him. Such a shame.

I've been googling around seeing if there were any CC's of the other half of the conversation that I didn't get on the net, but I have found nothing.

I would want to know who spoke against me.

These people were on the CC list: rms@gnu.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org, Eric Raymond esr@thyrsus.com , moglen@columbia.edu

Also Matthew garret the kernel programmer mentioned me on twitter recently:

https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/875520112480051200
> Matthew Garrett‏ @mjg59
>Noted misogynist troll MikeeUSA (http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/MikeeUSA ) is now, weirdly, on an anti-grsec tirade - http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/06/15/6

So he perhaps was watching too.


That... debian-user@lists.debian.org adds about 1000 names... :P



I also feel that bruce is now putting my name in a bad light, as if to say I don't know the law with his short, simple:

>OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage him.

My interpretation of the law, and my warning's AGAINST delay in bringing an action are not incorrect. Yet lay people will see his text and say "oh mikeeusa doesn't know what he's talking about" thus disparaging my name.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 08:20:53 [Preview] No. 10398 del
>>10393
>It's clear someone got to him, my best guess is some feminist from Debian contacted him. Such a shame.

Could you ask him what the problem is?

His email address is: bruce@perens.com

Since he says he has blocked me he won't get the emails I sent asking what the problem is.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 09:14:58 [Preview] No. 10400 del
Bruce Perens‏ @BrucePerens 4h4 hours ago

@elonmusk It's OK, Elon. Tweets that are just weird are fine. You aren't hiding behind a secret service guard while tweeting abuse at women.


https://twitter.com/search?q=Bruce+Perens

White Knight


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 09:31:54 [Preview] No. 10402 del
>>10398
E-mail sent, god only know if I get a reply. Might be better to ask him publicly via twitter.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 09:42:21 [Preview] No. 10403 del
(45.38 KB 499x287 anime1494426304527.jpg)
Pax Team's legal analysis: Red Hat does something similar, thus we're in the clear!

https://twitter.com/kurtseifried/status/885306886622334976

> PaX Team‏ @paxteam Jul 13
>
>where are the broken out kernel patches for RHEL again? oh wait... Red Hat threatens service contract termination if anyone 'leaks' them.

------
GPL v2
Section 6 states simply
"You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein."


From GRSecurity's "Stable Patch Agreement":

"Notwithstanding these rights and obligations, the User acknowledges that redistribution of the provided stable patches or changelogs outside of the explicit obligations under the GPL to User's customers will result in termination of access to future updates of grsecurity stable patches and changelogs."

Clear as day. What some lay people do not understand is that the terms in section 6 are governing what agreements and actions the distributee can take regarding furthur distributees, in reality, in the flesh.

Here the ACTIONS of GRSecurity are to RESTRICT the exercise of the redistribution rights of the further distributee.

This is an action prohibited by the terms offered by the linux-rights holders, and they have written as another term that the permission they give to use their property is revoked upon violation of their terms.

Very simple.

(Someone previously said on another thread:)
>And none are imposed. However, you are given the option to agree to them. Clear as day.

The proffering of the additional restrictive terms is in and of itself a violation of section 2. You are holding the clients to an additional restriction and enforcing this restriction via a threat to suspend business relationships.

(YES YOU HAVE IMPOSED AN ADDITIONAL RESTRICTION)


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 22:06:17 [Preview] No. 10405 del
Twitter requires a cell phone number and all the SMS-Recieve numbers on the net are allready in use.
I wanted to post a response to PaX Team's argument, could someone perhaps do it for me:


GPLv2 lacks a no-revocation clause. Licenses are revokable at will (barring estopple). Red Hat (or any other rightsholder), for instance, could revoke permission to use it's additions to the linux kernel at any point by whomever it disliked. You would then have to argue in court they are estopped from doing so because you relied on a promise or statement that they made that ran counter to that action.

This is why Red Hat can get away with it's business practices that Pax Team cite: if any other kernel developer sued them they can simply revoke his license to the parts of the Linux Kernel that use Red Hat owned code. This is also why companies like Microsoft contribute to the Linux Kernel: it's like building up a patent portfolio in a way.

Pax and GRSecurity are not in the same position; yet foolishly take similar actions, even actions going beyond what Red Hat does (even if the patches are not "broken out", they still, from Red Hat's side, are provided, furthermore they are integrated into the latest linux kernels: thus the purposes of the other kernel programmers are satiated)


https://twitter.com/kurtseifried/status/885306886622334976

> PaX Team\u200f @paxteam Jul 13
>
>where are the broken out kernel patches for RHEL again? oh wait... Red Hat threatens service contract termination if anyone 'leaks' them.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 22:07:44 [Preview] No. 10406 del
Also wish I could post >>10403 to the discussion on twitter :(


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 22:08:09 [Preview] No. 10407 del
>>10402
Thanks for sending that mail.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 05:54:59 [Preview] No. 10409 del
The 4chan /g/ thread's still going;
http://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/61383496#p61385201

If anyone want's to bump it.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 08:38:56 [Preview] No. 10412 del
>>10407
It's a mixed bag on the reply e-mail I'm afraid. It appears his stance on GRSecurity has not changed which is positive, however even though it appears you were an influence on his current stance he no longer values your opinion. He is something of a big cheese so for him to have listened to anyone in the community at all should be a credit to you.


The statement about Grsecurity still stands. Aconcernedfossdev was wasting my time with naive argument and I don't have to suffer fools gladly.

Thanks

Bruce

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017, 02:30 Anon wrote:

Hello Bruce, I am a long time follower of open source and my interest
was peaked in GRSecurity by a recent Slashdot post.
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-perens-warns-grsecurity-breaches-the-linux-kernels-gpl-license

With some searching I came across a Debian mailing list and reading an
exchange it culminated in this post:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html
"OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will
block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage him."

Was "aconcernedfossdev" a liar of some sort? The reply isn't very clear
as to what changed. Is the GRSecurity issue no longer of concern?

Thank you in advance of a reply


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 21:20:38 [Preview] No. 10416 del
>>10412

Thanks for posting the reply.

I don't see how countering BKuhn's stance that one should wait until other cases are resolved before taking action

( https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00811.html )

>Rather, the giant worldwide queue of known GPL violations
>should be prioritized by figuring out which ones, if solved, will do the
>most to maximize software freedom for all users.

And supporting Bruce Peren's stance (as seen here:)

( https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00814.html )

Warning of the dangers of not taking action is a "naive argument" and makes me a "fool". Laches still exists (to limit equitable relief). Statutes of limitation still exist (to limit relief under law).

Bruce Perens is not a licensed Attorney; I am. And yes you have to meet deadlines or your case is toast (or you'd better hope the other party continually violates your rights keeping the cause of action open).

He just seems to claim "well one could argue financial inability to pay a lawyer and thus defeat a laches defense". I pointed out that the courts do not accept "physical inability to get a job and comply with a court order to come up with funds because of imprisonment", so why would they accept "well I just can't get a lawyer, even though I could represent myself".

Also note: There is no civil right to council.

Bruce Perens didn't give one example of a laches defense being defeated by a middle class professional's supposed lack of funds to retain a lawer. He just linked to a wikipedia article (which doesn't mention any such thing) as if I didn't know what laches was, even though I brought it up.

Could you perhaps ask him what makes him think that I am a fool?

Remeber: the start of this part of the conversation was BKuhn's idea to just wait until every other case is settled before starting on the current one.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 22:25:35 [Preview] No. 10417 del
>>10416
I could ask, but his response won't be satisfying. It's the same as the mailing list and previous email. He clearly can't say you are wrong and I doubt he would admit to arrogance so his options are call you a fool without evidence again or not reply. Like I say, the fact he even gave you notice was impressive.


Anonymous 07/17/2017 (Mon) 02:11:47 [Preview] No. 10418 del
>>10417

If he responds, it would be interesting to see if he tries to give examples. If there are any (and I doubt there are) they will be from the District of Colombia (DC likes to help the poor, especially in, say, landlord-tenant disputes, for instance), but they wouldn't be applicable to the Third Circuit where GRSecurity now resides, nor would they be applicable to middle-class programmers (who are not indigent), nor would they likely be applicable to plaintiffs bringing an action at all.

I was brainstorming the next step in bringing an action: one is supposed to think of all the little affirmative defenses an opponent might bring as-well as all the procedural hurdles they will place in your way.

Basically it seems that Bruce has publically libeled me in the worst way: questioning my professional abilities, and now since you investigated; we have evidence that he, indeed, did mean it the way we (and likely others on the debian user mailing list) took it.

I imagine that he would like to retract his article, since it was induced by a "fool", however if he were to do so that would impact his reputation, and, ofcourse, there would be a new slashdot, soylentnews, ycombinator (hacker news) story on the retraction.

I do not imagine, however, that he will pursue the GRSecurity case further. A "fool" used him as an implement and he would wish to go no further I would imagine.

Note: one can compare my write-ups on the GRSecurity situation and then his later article. You will see echos of my language. I certainly did.

Thanks for sending that mail. I would be interested to see if he responds again for a clarification.


Anonymous 07/17/2017 (Mon) 03:39:31 [Preview] No. 10419 del
Thanks for sending that original email.


Anonymous 07/21/2017 (Fri) 01:44:30 [Preview] No. 10462 del
Bump! GRSEC!


Anonymous 07/25/2017 (Tue) 02:57:38 [Preview] No. 10479 del
So grsec is just going to get away with this right?


Anonymous 07/25/2017 (Tue) 09:42:08 [Preview] No. 10481 del
(120.41 KB 317x317 cirno1494102764033.png)
So far:

https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170725.031825.ed49c220.en.html
>Why am I being stonewalled (GRSecurity discussion)?
Why am I being stonewalled from the discussion now?

I started the discussion, now because you all believe Bruce Peren's
libel that I "don't know what I'm talking about" (after he wrote an
article based on my council...) and his public sanction against me
because HE didn't understand the importance of brainstorming any and all
likely arguments from the other side (because HE is brought in as an
expert witness only once an action is well underway and doesn't witness
the work that is done in bringing a case forward from a cold start), I
am no longer included in the conversation.

I feel I've been wronged and I am very angry about it.

> The statement about Grsecurity still stands. Aconcernedfossdev was
> wasting my time with naive argument and I don't have to suffer fools
> gladly.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruce

https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html

> OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will
> block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage
> him.
>
> Bruce

-----

https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170725.033931.203f0479.en.html
Author: Se7en
Date: 2017-07-25 03:39 UTC
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Why am I being stonewalled (GRSecurity discussion)?
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 03:18:25AM +0000, aconcernedfossdev@??? wrote:
> Why am I being stonewalled from the discussion now?

So you were kicked out of a discussion thread for being weird, you go
to 8chan to complain, they figure out you're a sockpuppet of
MikeeeUSA, and then you leave there and come to the devuan mailing
list and don't even put OT in the subject header.

Mikeee, you're a weirdo and outside of maybe 10 people no one thinks
you are even competent.

--
|-----/ | Se7en
/ The One and Only! | se7en@???
/ | 0x73518A15BA3C1476
/ | http://koolkidsklub.tech/~se7en




---
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170725.081249.e8258b5b.en.html
Author: aconcernedfossdev
Date: 2017-07-25 08:12 UTC
To: Se7en
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Why am I being stonewalled (GRSecurity discussion)?
I was responding to this by Bradley M. Kuhn:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00811.html
> Rather, the giant worldwide queue of known GPL violations
> should be prioritized by figuring out which ones, if solved, will do
> the
> most to maximize software freedom for all users.

Explaining why resting on ones rights is a very inadvisable move.
Laches will bar you from equitable relief after a time, the statute of
limitations for the claim will bar you from relief under law (money
damages).

Bruce then made a claim of "well a programmer could claim they had no
money to hire a lawyer". I said that a court would not be impressed by a
plaintiff making such an argument.
For that I get stonewalled and libeled.

I also started to brainstorm various defenses the opposition might
bring. This offended Bruce (who, BTW, lets everyone know that he is not
a lawyer.)

We are not supposed to anticipate an opponents moves apparently...



As for competence.
I am competent at making 3d video game maps.
I am competent at 3d modeling.
I am competent at game code programming.
I am competent at argument to help induce you to fork Debian.
I am competent at inducing Bruce Perens to publish an advisory regarding
GRSecurity and it's copyright violation, which was my goal.

What do you find me incompetent in?


On 2017-07-25 03:39, Se7en wrote:


Anonymous 07/25/2017 (Tue) 09:58:01 [Preview] No. 10482 del
(348.86 KB 800x761 cirno1500869292161.png)
.


Anonymous 07/25/2017 (Tue) 10:03:52 [Preview] No. 10483 del
(26.14 KB 250x250 cirno1493978377374.jpg)
.


Anonymous 07/28/2017 (Fri) 10:58:53 [Preview] No. 10496 del
(76.76 KB 678x845 cirno1495572003350.jpg)
http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/tech/res/764966.html

>>772201
> >>772183
> >Who the fuck do you think induced Bruce Perens to write his article. Who do you think was conversing with him.
>
>Certainly not you, pedophile. You're just an autistic shitheel who never shuts up about their shitty game mod on an imageboard.

---

>>772201

>shitheel

It was me, grandpa. Who do you think "a concerned foss dev" is.

I was communicating with bruce and from my communication he decided to write his alert after a week of my legal council. Yes, I am a lawyer weather you like it or not.

>pedophile

There is nothing wrong with taking female children as brides (Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew). There is something wrong with enticing others to follow another ruler other than that of the God found in the book of the Law (Deuteronomy). Such people are commanded to be immediately killed.

Proud White American Man, boldly making the world safe for Adult Consenting White Women are not looked on fondly by those writings it seems...

I also helped convince the people around Jaromil etc to fork Debian. They cited my arguments in an article in distrowatch. You'll probably claim a "shitheel pedophile" can't do that either. I also convinced programmers of nexuiz to make many additions for me, way back when, additions which have proven very useful for my fork (see, I think ahead: something you white men don't do: your only thoughts are "how do I serve muh white woman better" "oh shit I need muney, how duh i get duh muney, oh ill trade my time! hehehe I'll be rich!").


Anonymous 07/28/2017 (Fri) 11:14:41 [Preview] No. 10497 del
(1.50 MB 2560x1821 anime1496291099499.jpg)
Update From someone privy to information:
Paraphrase:
Plaintiffs have apparently been told that they need to bring their action
through the appropriate foundation and that that foundation is not
interested in legal action as it may cause corporate involvement to cease.
Spender has successfully forked Linux (and un-opensourced the derivative work)
and nothing will be done about it.


--
My thoughts:
Now, ofcourse, since Linus never required an assignment of copyright, each
plaintiff who has code that is modified by GRSecurity has standing to bring
an action.

However GRSecurity will attempt to argue that Linux is a work of Joint copyright.
If they were to successfully argue that then 50 percent of the contributors
are needed for an action to commence. Now Linux is not a work of Joint copyright,
instead it is a derivative work built upon a derivative work built upon ... etc,
but yes you need to argue against their defense as they will attempt to
show a court how linux is different from, say, a song, since it is a program
and takes longer to construct (even 20 years) etc. Additionally GRSecurity
will attempt to argue fair use via de minimus. This defense could work against
a lone plaintiff who's property is only slightly modified by GRSecurity.

For these reasons it is desirable to have a plaintiff that owns much of linux.
A small contributor would have much less of a chance of success.


Anonymous 07/28/2017 (Fri) 11:18:12 [Preview] No. 10498 del
Any news from Bruce Peren's or his friends (Moglen etc) who seem to be on his side and by their silence seem to assent to his opinion against me?

I am very angry that he and they disrespect me.


Anonymous 07/28/2017 (Fri) 13:35:28 [Preview] No. 10500 del
(109.55 KB 768x864 anime1498260662592.jpg)
>>10499
>Maybe he's A persona, a lure, and doesnt exist,

People have claimed to see Bruce Perens in real life however...

What is your opinion on all this.
Also why did the 8channer call me a "shitheel". Is he a retarded old white man who needs to defend muh white wuman no matter how negatively such affects his own class? Why does he feel that "pedophile" is an insult. Those who like cute adorable young girls have correctly operating brains and eyes, unlike those who like old women and more cushin for pushin hoorah white man thought


Anonymous 07/29/2017 (Sat) 19:27:11 [Preview] No. 10502 del
You got blocked because you are a nutball that thinks you were giving Bruce Perens "legal advice" and "council" (unsolicited no less - and it's "counsel", not "council").

Now you are here, and you are asking people on an anonymous chan to contact him for you.
That's nutball.

If you have an actual case, then file it. If you don't (and you don't) then you would be doing yourself a huge favor by finding a way to not fixate on things and move on to things that will help you in life instead of go nowhere.


Anonymous 07/31/2017 (Mon) 15:09:30 [Preview] No. 10509 del
(37.28 KB 252x282 anime1497141895776.jpg)
>If you have an actual case, then file it.
>If you don't (and you don't) then you would be doing yourself a huge favor by finding a way to not fixate on things and move on to things that will help you in life instead of go nowhere.

GRSecurity is violating section 6 of the license, blatantly.

Yes there is a case.

Tell us why you do not think there is?

>You got blocked because you are a nutball that thinks you were giving Bruce Perens

I directly induced Bruce Perens to issue his advisory. Yes I was giving legal council regarding the GRSecurity issue. I was informing every person I could about the violation, and why it legally was a violation

And yes, I am an attorney. Yes I am trained in this area of study. Yes I know more about it than you even if you are a Proud American White Man Programmer and know everything there is to know since birth.

Bruce Perens blocked me once I brought up laches as if I were crazy to brainstorm affirmative defenses that will be raised by the opposition.

Some people do not think such things are so crazy:



On 2017-07-30 07:14, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/30/2017 12:55 AM, David Lang wrote:
>> You are thinking of Trademarks, they must be defended or you loose them.
>> Contracts and Licenses do not need to be defended at every chance or risk
>> loosing them.
>
> No, not always, it can apply in plain contract as well. The defenses that
> could be later raised by grsecurity if this issue goes unaddressed is are (1)
> latches; and (2) waiver. It is a slippery slope. While, without commenting on
> the dubious nature of the current use of the defenses (as catch-all,
> kitchen-sink affirmative-defenses), they can be expected to be raised if
> rights under GPL to insure no further restrictions are placed on subsequent
> use of the kernel-code are not enforced.
>
> I hope there is a centralized forum that will be established for this issue
> (there may be and I'm just not smart enough to have found it yet). Certainly,
> if for nothing else, so the advantages and disadvantages of both action, and
> inaction, can be peer-reviewed on both the legal and technical side.


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 17:41:21 [Preview] No. 10523 del
(1.95 MB 1795x609 anime1498261152046.png)
Nu post from Bruce:
----------------------------------------

https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170801.150413.f63c5034.en.html

Author: Bruce Perens
Date: 2017-08-01 15:04 UTC
To: Rick Moen
CC: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] Yes I am an attorney. - Re: Identity of OP (Software written by contractors and the 'work for hire') concept
The person posting as "nisus" is "MikeyUSA", who is mostly known for
way-over-the-top misogyny and trolling and is banned from Debian lists,
etc. Obviously I have the right to choose who I will correspond with, and
chose to block him for wasting my time before I was informed who he
actually was.


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 18:34:28 [Preview] No. 10524 del
If YOU have a case then file it.

If YOU are not going to file a case then move on.

You asked for an opinion. This is an independent i-have-no-dog-in-this-fight opinion made purely for your benefit. You are obsessed with this, you have delusions of grandeur, and you really should take this one to heart: Your legal credibility is zilch because you have demonstrated once again that you do not know the difference between the words "council" (people) and "counsel" (advice).

That one is like a lawyer showing up in a courtroom with no pants on. Move on.


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 18:57:10 [Preview] No. 10525 del
>>10524
>If YOU have a case then file it.
Yea, let's not go for the joint action, and certainly not a class action. Yep, fire away each individually to be sniped one by one via de-minimus fair use.

>If YOU are not going to file a case then move on.
I am an attorney. My job is to help other people with their cases, council lay people on the best move for them to make, council lay people on what their legal rights are, etc.

Here I council programmers on their legal rights, explaining that there is a cause of action, why that is so, and what they can do about it.

I have all-ready proven in their minds that there is a cause of action (see Bruce Peren's posts etc). That has moved the rolling stone a bit. Now I am working to move it the next bit.

Bit by bit.

Same thing I did to convince others to fork Debian.

>You asked for an opinion. This is an independent i-have-no-dog-in-this-fight opinion made purely for your benefit. You are obsessed with this, you have delusions of grandeur, and you really should take this one to heart:

>Your legal credibility is zilch
My analysis alone proves my credibility.

>because you have demonstrated once again that you do not know the difference between the words "council" (people) and "counsel" (advice).
Explain to me exactly what spelling has to do with demonstrating the merit of one's legal opinions. Prove that spelling council as council nullifies the validity of my analysis.

>That one is like a lawyer showing up in a courtroom with no pants on. Move on.
One sets up the pieces before one plays the game.

I have been working on this for a year. I am setting the pieces and am now beginning to be met by success. If you had not noticed:
http://perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/

https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-perens-warns-grsecurity-breaches-the-linux-kernels-gpl-license


And yes, it was my aim to have a prominent opensource advocate to adopt and repeat my views.

Just as it was my aim previously to assist in inducing the creation of a non-systemd Debian fork.

> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg01524.html


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 19:04:04 [Preview] No. 10526 del
I fire back:
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20170801.181537.1f7cb12c.en.html


Re: [DNG] Yes I am an attorney. - Re: Identity of OP (Software written by contractors and the 'work for hire') concept - To Bruce Perens

Explain exactly how I was "wasting" your time. You responded with derision and mockery when I brought up laches; as if it was no issue. Then you made a claim that a court would accept a _plaintiff's_ claim that they just had to sit on their rights because they "had no money to hire a lawyer" when the court would simply inform said plaintiff that they can bring the action pro-se. There is not a right council in civil cases even for indigent defendants, and you mock me for bringing up laches when attempting to obtain injunctive relief when we are talking about a plaintiff in a civil case?

Courts don't even accept a civil defendants claim that they cannot pay an ordered judgement (where the court believes they money exist "somewhere" and the defendant is holding out) owing to the fact that the court had them jailed for contempt of court for six months prior and thus defendant had no means of raising said funds. Back in the slammer for another six months, over and over again. No, Bruce. A middle class programmer trying to defeat a laches affirmative defense, when he is of sound mind and body, solely with a claim of inability... will not work.

I brainstorm some of the affirmative defenses the opposition WILL use, and you mock me and put my reputation as it pertains to legal knowledge in a negative false light. This is when you, Bruce, are not an attorney and are thus not likely involved in the lengthy run-up to your court appearances (as an expert witness), where-as I am an attorney and must anticipate such road-blocks.


Here's another attorney on the LKML warning another poster about some... hmmm.. affirmative defenses ... such as laches and friends.
On 2017-07-30 07:14, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/30/2017 12:55 AM, David Lang wrote:
>> You are thinking of Trademarks, they must be defended or you loose them.
>> Contracts and Licenses do not need to be defended at every chance or risk
>> loosing them.
>
> No, not always, it can apply in plain contract as well. The defenses that
> could be later raised by grsecurity if this issue goes unaddressed is are (1)
> latches; and (2) waiver. It is a slippery slope. While, without commenting on
> the dubious nature of the current use of the defenses (as catch-all,
> kitchen-sink affirmative-defenses), they can be expected to be raised if
> rights under GPL to insure no further restrictions are placed on subsequent
> use of the kernel-code are not enforced.
>
> I hope there is a centralized forum that will be established for this issue
> (there may be and I'm just not smart enough to have found it yet). Certainly,
> if for nothing else, so the advantages and disadvantages of both action, and
> inaction, can be peer-reviewed on both the legal and technical side.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/31/449


For the record here's what Bruce Perens had to say about me:


> OK, I apologize to all who were involved in this conversation. I will
> block further emails from "aconcernedfossdev" and no longer encourage
> him.
>
> Bruce
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/07/msg00830.html


(later a third party asked him why):
> The statement about Grsecurity still stands. Aconcernedfossdev was
> wasting my time with naive argument and I don't have to suffer fools
> gladly.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bruce



On 2017-08-01 15:04, Bruce Perens wrote:
> The person posting as "nisus" is "MikeyUSA", who is mostly known for
> way-over-the-top misogyny and trolling and is banned from Debian
> lists, etc. Obviously I have the right to choose who I will correspond
> with, and chose to block him for wasting my time before I was informed
> who he actually was.
> ___________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Anonymous 08/02/2017 (Wed) 00:24:51 [Preview] No. 10530 del
If you were an attorney, "counsel" would be one of the very last words you wouldn't know how to spell. Good luck with life. I can tell you're gonna need it.


Anonymous 08/02/2017 (Wed) 10:52:00 [Preview] No. 10533 del
(87.22 KB 653x800 anime1498261000847.jpg)
>>10530
You have no arguments against my legal council. Thus you hang your hat on spelling. Lets hear some arguments against my legal points.

Yes, I am a licensed attorney weather(hehe) you like it or not.

My council is having some effect:
https://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=46828
http://perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-perens-warns-grsecurity-breaches-the-linux-kernels-gpl-license
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/31/449

Notice how my legal argument convinces others?

>If you were an attorney, "counsel" would be one of the very last words you wouldn't know how to spell. Good luck with life. I can tell you're gonna need it.

I am going to repeat myself:

>Your legal credibility is zilch
My analysis alone proves my credibility.

>because you have demonstrated once again that you do not know the difference between the words "council" (people) and "counsel" (advice).
Explain to me exactly what spelling has to do with demonstrating the merit of one's legal opinions. Prove that spelling council as council nullifies the validity of my analysis.

You haven't done so. You just repeated "you spelled something wrong therefore you are not a lawyer". I'm sure I spelled things incorrectly on the written portion of the bar exam as-well. What's your argument?

Oh, you have no argument. Just an angry, red-in-the-face, white male animal (who opposes his own interests (such as taking young girls as brides as is allowed in Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew) and advances the interests of the white woman as his one and only purpose in life). "U R WRONG, U SPELD SUMDING WRONG, BETTER A MILLSTONE!!!! JEBUS!!! OVERTURNED OLD TESTAMENT _OOOOLLLDDDDD__ TESTAMENT. MUH WHITE WUMAN"


Anonymous 08/02/2017 (Wed) 12:14:39 [Preview] No. 10534 del
(946.79 KB 720x720 anim1497740819257.png)
Well what do you know, another attorney recognizes the existence of laches etc. Perhaps Bruce is incorrect in labeling me a "Fool"

--------------------

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2017-July/044040.html

On 07/29/2017 07:53 AM, nisus at redchan.it wrote:
> ( NOTE: If you would like to read on how your copyright is being violated by
> GRSecurity, Bruce Perens posted a good write-up on his web-page )
> (
> perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/
> )
> ( There was also a discussion on the linux section of slashdot, and on the
> debian user mailing list, and on the dng devuan mailing list and on the
> openwall mailing list and the fedora legal mailing list )

Paul Allen's concerns on LKML that if the GPL rights are not asserted, then
any future, or additional violations, by grsecurity could raise the defenses
of waiver or latches against future actions based upon a failure to assert GPL
rights here (while dubious, they become additional hurdles that must be
responded to and overcome, regardless of their merit). Thread:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/29/128

If you are a contributor, it makes sense to get in contact with others
similarly situated, and make sure you understand the competing issues, the
statute of limitations that apply, and the upside/downside to acting or
failing to act. No, I'm not looking for clients either, but will explore the
issue and contribute to the extent needed. I've followed the earlier
grsecurity threads on this list out of curiosity that something like this may
unfold.

--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.


Anonymous 08/02/2017 (Wed) 20:38:52 [Preview] No. 10537 del
Bwahahahaha! "licensed" attorney! Never passed fag detected. No name, no state bar association, no attorney you lying faggot.


Anonymous 08/03/2017 (Thu) 07:07:44 [Preview] No. 10540 del
(158.14 KB 341x330 anime1494201117963.png)
>>10537
>Bwahahahaha! "licensed" attorney! Never passed fag detected. No name, no state bar association, no attorney you lying faggot.

My legal analysis is all the proof you will ever be given; and said work-product is, in-fact, all the proof one needs.

I am not going to supply anonymous enemies on the internet with my name, my attorney registration number, nor any other information with which you could triangulate me.

Why would I do this.

Oh, the standard white man "I can defeat ANYONE. So here's my info. COME AT ME BRUUHHH!!!"

I remember some retarded white man Men's Rights Activist (TM) (that was, never-the-less, opposed to child marriage of qt3.14 young girls, and in-favor of men being imprisoned for raping their wives etc) that did that years ago. Soon after that he was self-employed. I think William Price was his name. His online publication soon-after became a whine-fest about his domestic problems.

Fucking retard. Just giving out valuable information in return for what? Other white male retards thinking he's "yea, real man!".

Why would anyone want the admiration of scum who don't see beauty in cute young girls, and who oppose one acquiring them (Allowed in Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew).


Anonymous 08/04/2017 (Fri) 00:19:11 [Preview] No. 10541 del
>My legal analysis is all the proof you will ever be given

Hahaha! Because you don't have anything!

>and said work-product is, in-fact, all the proof one needs.

Nope. You need to be a member of a bar association to practice law.


You're gonna get doxxed.


Anonymous 08/04/2017 (Fri) 22:27:15 [Preview] No. 10545 del
>>10541
> >My legal analysis is all the proof you will ever be given
>Hahaha! Because you don't have anything!

Sigh.

> >and said work-product is, in-fact, all the proof one needs.

>Nope. You need to be a member of a bar association to practice law.

I am a member of the bar association. No I will not give you my registration number, location, etc etc.

If you were an attorney you would recognize that I am as-well by my arguments. Real recognizes real. You're just an idiot white man however, always opposed to his own self interest, always ready to die for the women who rule over him, so I suppose it is beyond your depth.

>You're gonna get doxxed.
Is that why you keep asking for my information?

Be careful. I have absolutely nothing to lose. No child bride is in my future, just waiting and waiting to die.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 00:12:39 [Preview] No. 10546 del
LOLLOLOLOL! I never asked you for anything dipshit! More delusion on your part. I have no interest in your lying bullshit. I am stating a fact: You are not an attorney. No name, no bar association, no attorney. You are a lying sack of shit is all you are.

>be careful

FUCK YOU ASSWIPE EAT SHIT! DON'T YOU FUCKING TELL ME WHAT TO DO! You are gonna get doxxed and it's gonna be popcorn time for a lot of people.


zappf 08/05/2017 (Sat) 03:32:13 [Preview] No. 10547 del


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 04:16:48 [Preview] No. 10549 del
OP stop replying no joke


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 05:16:40 [Preview] No. 10550 del
b1M9IqJ6pZt99BFnP3MER+Q4WtD89u3cfqgxQsmW=


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 05:22:29 [Preview] No. 10551 del
ircffs


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:17:10 [Preview] No. 10552 del
MikeeUSA is 31
Name: Michael McAllister
Location: Islip, NY, USA.

He probably has a law degree or is currently studying for his law degree.
He probably also has a computer science degree and a mathematics degree from some university in New York.
He's not Jewish, he's Irish, probably Roman Catholic.

This is probably a relative of Mikke USA, probably his dad or uncle. That would expalin his claims of being a lawyer. His dad probably paid for his law degree.

http://www.ssbb.com/attorneys/michael-j-mcallister

Michael J. McAllister
Michael J. McAllister is a partner of Satterlee Stephens LLP.   For over forty years, Mr. McAllister has represented individuals, public companies and private firms in various commercial matters in the state and federal courts and in arbitration and mediation.  A significant segment of his practice has involved the representation of numerous broker-dealers and their employees in federal and state courts, including their appellate courts, S.R.O. enforcement proceedings and over 200 arbitrations tried to award before the SEC, NYSE, AMEX, FINRA (formerly NASD-DR) and AAA.  These proceedings include trials, appeals, federal grand juries, disciplinary proceedings before federal and state regulators. In October, 2014, the Appellate Division, First Department appointed Mr. McAllister as Special Master. As an arbitrator for FINRA, Mr. McAllister has sat as an arbitrator on approximately 30 hearing panels.  Further, he mediated five securities industry disputes.  PLI published articles written by Mr. McAllister for its Securities Arbitration handbook in 1991, 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2001, 2003 and 2004.  Mr. McAllister co-authored “Calculating Damages in Broker Raiding Cases” which appears in the Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, Spring 2006, Vol. 11, pg. 261.  Mr. McAllister testified as an expert witness on three occasions. Mr. McAllister is admitted to practice in New York.  He is also admitted to practice before the United States District Courts for the Southern District and Eastern District, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States Supreme Court.

Contact Information email: mmcallister@ssbb.com Phone: (212) 404-8728


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:21:02 [Preview] No. 10553 del
Practice Areas: * Labor and Employment Law * Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Education: Fordham University (LL.B.)
Georgetown University (A.B.)

Admissions: New York United States Supreme Court United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern District

Both are Jesuit Universities


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:23:19 [Preview] No. 10554 del
>>10480
>dyne
Not even once.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:27:29 [Preview] No. 10555 del
>>10547
Why would you have posted for 10 years under that name knowing you wrote that in 2004?

This is a matter of incompetence
>>10553
Deuteronomy says thats none of your business.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:40:39 [Preview] No. 10556 del
Applicant: Mary and Michael McAllister 15 Beechtree Lane, Apt. 1C Bronxville, NY 10708-1414

McAllister, Mary and Michael September 9, 2009 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION AND NOTICE OF LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING, ISSUES CONFERENCE, AND ADJUDICATORY HEARING Applicant: Mary and Michael McAllister 15 Beechtree Lane, Apt. 1C Bronxville, NY 10708-1414 Project Application Number: 1-4728-04203/00001 Project Location and Description: Applicant is the owner of a certain parcel of real property located at 200 Broadway, Saltaire, Town of Islip, County of Suffolk, State of New York 11706. The parcel is improved by a single family dwelling. The parcel contains a Class II freshwater wetland. Applicant proposes to expand the existing single family dwelling by the addition of a second story comprising 460 square feet (sq. ft.). Permits Requested: Applicant has applied to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("Department") for a permit pursuant to article 24, title 7 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law ("ECL") (Freshwater Wetlands Regulations), and part 663 (Freshwater Wetlands Permit Requirements) of title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York ("6 NYCRR"). In addition, the project will require approvals from the Town of Islip.

His mom is a dentist, his dad is a lawyer. He's a rich brat with autism that goes around threatening people on the internet.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 07:44:33 [Preview] No. 10557 del
>>10554
I assumed dyne doxed mike thats why I said this, Apparently opsec failure is what did it. He should still post I literally have nothing different about the way I imagine the poster. Use anonymouth and keep posting dude fuck it.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 08:14:43 [Preview] No. 10558 del
>mikee was a well off New York attorney and alumni of multipal jesuit universities.
Somehow him getting doxed is a power move on his behalf because this dude is fucking ballin'. Rarely do you think higher of someone after they are unmasked this guy is more successfull than me for sure definatly in the top percentile amongst neets.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 08:22:15 [Preview] No. 10559 del
I don't think his dox is anything to piss yourself over, he basically already posted this much with some back story in his many threads. He didn't even care to hide his name.

From what I remember, mostly in the 8ch/AGDG, he studied law in NY but couldn't continue for mental health reasons. He could have gone back to pass since then. His parents are well off so he doesn't claim social security. Not exactly sure whether his mental health problem was a psychotic break or something pre existing. It sounded like some sort of anxiety disorder, maybe mild schizophrenia controlled with medication, I'm not a health professional.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 08:47:05 [Preview] No. 10560 del
>>105529
He could make millions off this if he plays his cards right. Think about it.I dont follow this drama I am aware of the name mikeeusa but I have debated the guy about how 12 is absolutely not an appropriate age for marriage let alone sexual contact.and that seems like an excercize he does to sharpen his debating skills. Now of course there is still the feeling he is a pedo so he should monetize that and specialize in defending what he has been debating like its second nature. He should make an onion website called "better skype mikee" and advertize on the hidden wiki. He can make lemonade or he can make a lemon-face. Either way this is amusing.. I would really like to see him in a courtroom opening up the bible they swear on and defending some molestation case with the bible. That is meme magick right there,.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 09:20:13 [Preview] No. 10561 del
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fordham_University_School_of_Law

Motto in English In the Service of Others
Type Private[1]
Established 1905
Affiliation Catholic,
Jesuit President Rev. Joseph M. McShane S.J.
Dean Matthew Diller[2][3][4]
Postgraduates 1,500
Location New York City, New York, United States
Campus Lincoln Center (Manhattan):

http://law.fordham.edu/

MikkeUSA Jesuit Coadjutor


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 09:33:24 [Preview] No. 10562 del
There is a > 60% chance that MikeeUSA AKA Michael McAllister either graduated from Fordham Law, or is currently attending Fordham Law, which is probably the Alma Matter of his father, who is probably the Lawyer who's information is posted above.

He also might want to revist his anti-christianity stance and repent to the True and Orthodox Roman Catholic faith of his forefathers. Stop calling people ChristCuck Mikee its hypocritical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islip,_New_York


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 09:59:09 [Preview] No. 10563 del
>>10562
>True and Orthodox Roman Catholic faith of his forefathers
What are you, a Sedevacantist?


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 10:04:38 [Preview] No. 10564 del


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 10:10:20 [Preview] No. 10565 del
Brian McAllister joined Marlin & Associates in 2013. Brian previously completed undergraduate internships at Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Berkery Noyes, where he worked with companies in the technology, business services and information sectors. Brian graduated from Fordham University’s Gabelli School of Business with a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance. Brian was awarded a National Merit Scholarship and admitted to Fordham’s Manresa Scholars program. In his spare time, Brian enjoys traveling, trying new foods, and watching sports and movies.

https://www.facebook.com/public/Brian-Mcallister


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 10:34:27 [Preview] No. 10566 del
This is probably what MikeeUSA looks like in general.


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 11:02:08 [Preview] No. 10567 del
http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/tech/res/764966.html#q775892

>>775433 MikeeUSA is your superior, shitstain. Bend the knee or have it removed swiftly!

No Mikee, this is your Superior:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arturo_Sosa


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 11:04:29 [Preview] No. 10568 del
>>10566
You cant hide that smothery look in his face. Fuck this guy fuck mike I am getting pissed now.,


Anonymous 08/05/2017 (Sat) 18:45:04 [Preview] No. 10570 del
http://pview.findlaw.com/view/2326544_1

Michael T. McAllister 60 Centre StreetNew York, NY 10007 Phones: (212) 608-0700
People Attorneys McAllister, Michael T. Office Information
Address 60 Centre StreetNew York, NY 10007
Phone (212) 608-0700

https://www.nycourts.gov/courts/1jd/

NEW YORK COUNTY COURTS (MANHATTAN) - N.Y. State Courts 60 Centre St New York, NY 10007.Manhattan Treatment Court. 60 Lafayette Street New York, NY 10013.

Supreme, Civil Term 60 Centre St New York, NY 10007 80 Centre St New York, NY 10013 111 Centre St New York, NY 10013 71 Thomas Street New York, NY 10013 Phone: 646-386-3600 Fax: 212-374-3326 Hours: 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. Parking: Metered parking across from 100 Centre St. Private lots in area.


Anonymous 08/06/2017 (Sun) 11:17:32 [Preview] No. 10572 del
http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/tech/res/764966.html

MikeeUSA:
>Proud White American Man, boldly making the world safe for Adult Consenting White Women are not looked on fondly by those writings it seems...
>see, I think ahead: something you white men don't do: your only thoughts are "how do I serve muh white woman better" "oh shit I need muney..."
>Notice that the retarded old white man has no response.

>And yes, I am an attorney. Yes I am trained in this area of study. Yes I know more about it than you even if you are a Proud American White Man Programmer and know everything there is to know since birth.

>Both left and right white men totally support women's rights and oppose child marriage of girls to men. What is that which both "sides" have in common? White Proud American Men.

>Oh, you have no argument. Just an angry, red-in-the-face, white male animal (who opposes his own interests (such as taking young girls as brides as is allowed in Deuteronomy 22, 28-29, hebrew) and advances the interests of the white woman as his one and only purpose in life).

>Oh, the standard white man "I can defeat ANYONE. So here's my info. COME AT ME BRUUHHH!!!"

>White man makes false claims, gets called out, doesn't respond

>All of you proud white anti-child-bride men were like "nooo he's not violating bla bla bla" U don't have law degree bla bla bla bla.

That was pretty clever Mr. McAllister, everyone would have been looking for an olive skinned Jewish Hebrew Lawyer from Europe even though your handle clearly said Mike from USA, who is an Irish, Roman Catholic, and a proud white male programmer from Isilp, New York.

Mr. McAllister get to the principal's office at once! The principal is a white woman with a wodden ruler... Get ready for a smacked bottom!


Anonymous 08/06/2017 (Sun) 11:34:31 [Preview] No. 10573 del
Hypocrite \Hyp"o*crite\, n. [F., fr. L. hypocrita, Gr. ? one who
plays a part on the stage, a dissembler, feigner. See
{Hypocrisy}.]
One who plays a part; especially, one who, for the purpose of
winning approbation of favor, puts on a fair outside seeming;
'''one who feigns to be other and better than he is; a false
pretender to virtue or piety; one who simulates virtue or
piety'''.
[1913 Webster]

The hypocrite's hope shall perish. --Job viii. 13.

-->English explanatory dictionary (synonyms)
-->hypocrite

[ˈhɪpəkrɪt] n. deceiver, double-dealer, quack, charlatan, impostor or imposter, mountebank, confidence man or trickster, faker, pretender, liar, Pharisee, whited sepulchre, Tartuffe, flimflammer, Colloq phoney or US also phony, con man, flimflam man or artist, two-face:

It is incredible that so many were duped by that hypocrite.

-->WordNet
-->hypocrite

hypocrite
n : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he does not
hold [syn: {dissembler}, {phony}, {phoney}, {pretender}]


Anonymous 08/06/2017 (Sun) 11:37:13 [Preview] No. 10574 del
I am an attorney. Yes I am trained in this area of study.

-Proud American Irish Roman Catholic White Man Programmer


Anonymous 08/06/2017 (Sun) 12:54:01 [Preview] No. 10575 del
MikeeUSA New Member
Joined: May 25, 2000
Messages: 102
Likes Received: 0
Name: Michael McAllister
Age: 14
Nick Names: MikeeUSA, Mikee, Drew Armon
Occupation: Skool, Computers.
Location: Islip, NY, USA
Likes: Computers, discussing theorems, discussing psychology, Linux, Infiltration, GNU, UT, Learning rights to anyone, Corporate Propaganda, Useful Material, guns, level design, artwork, the good things people do.
MikeeUSA, Nov 23, 2004

If he posted this in 2004 that would actually make Mr. Michael McAllister 27 years old at the current time.
The average age for passing the bar is 27 and the pass rate is 66% in New York State.
Based on that I highly doubt that he's passed the bar exam. You're looking for a Law Student approximately 27-31 years of age, a white male. He might be attending Columbia Law School. Here are some other possible options:

Albany Law School (Albany, NY)
Brooklyn Law School (Brooklyn, NY)
CUNY School of Law (Flushing, NY)
Columbia Law School (New York, NY)
Cornell Law School (Ithaca, NY)
Fordham University School of Law (New York, NY)
Hofstra University School of Law (Hempstead, NY)

There are about 20 or so other options. He's probably on Facebook.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply