/tech/ - Technology

Brought to you by archive.org

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096


(172.42 KB 1200x900 opensmtpd.jpg)
Anything interesting on EuroBSDCon? Anonymous 09/25/2017 (Mon) 17:20:04 [Preview] No. 11290 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Anything new this year?
3 posts and 1 image omitted.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 01:08:20 [Preview] No. 11351 del
>>11339
Rip it and post it here.


Anonymous 09/30/2017 (Sat) 12:27:45 [Preview] No. 11424 del
deraadt talking about integration with pledge:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fYgG0ds2_UQ


Anonymous 09/30/2017 (Sat) 21:39:51 [Preview] No. 11427 del
>>11424
Rip it and post it here.


Anonymous 09/30/2017 (Sat) 23:06:20 [Preview] No. 11428 del
>>11427
How about you contribute yourself?


Anonymous 10/01/2017 (Sun) 03:26:50 [Preview] No. 11430 del
(27.83 KB 486x309 notbad.jpg)
>>11424
>"We can't do this [pledge(2)] on firefox. It is this amorphous piece of ahhh... junk." - de Raadt, Theo.

It should go to theo.c right away:
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/mg/Attic/theo.c



Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 10:22:46 [Preview] No. 11399 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Wanna have a bad day ?
Skim through some of these comments:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15354114


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 10:26:07 [Preview] No. 11400 del
At first I was angry, but then I just felt sad.


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 10:52:55 [Preview] No. 11402 del
>Not if that data is encrypted with a key that they don***t have. Which is what Apple does.
huahuaha. Fuck. Why do this with us OP?
It's probably astroturfing/psyops, but it's really sad.

Besides that:
>prove you're legit
>google captcha

Let's have a consensus here: never share HN again, ok?

Here's better places to get news/information:

https://lobste.rs
https://soylentnews.org
https://undeadly.org
https://twitter.com/_cryptome_
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 15:17:03 [Preview] No. 11405 del
>>11399
First problem they made was vesting their trust in corporations.
Second mistake they made was believing they preserve their information and respect their privacy.

>Open Source does not automatically equal safe
They aren't wrong here, an open-source application or operating system has the potential to become malicious if the individual using is does not have access to a properly conducted audit or has not conducted an audit themselves. Using closed-source software is similar to drinking soda that does not have an ingredient list or hasn't been inspected by the FDA or a third party, an individual or corporation can tell you that the soda is perfectly safe and is similar to the open-source soda with the ingredients list visible and proper inspections, but you have to very much blindly follow their advice while deep inside, you have no idea what the closed-source soda is inflicting upon your body. This soda example is good, because it is not difficult for an individual to learn what each ingredient is and how it works together to make a food, and I know FOR A FACT that there would be a massive uproar if ingredients were no longer required to be listed, there already is a growing movement to push for labeling of genetically modified foods and pesticide usage, so it baffles me that the same people who use computers with closed-source software and proprietary hardware won't fight for better software and hardware, but will fight for better food and labeling, perhaps it is a hierarchy of desires, food of course is much more vital to ones life compared to a measly computer...

>They work hard to protect my information from external hackers, there have never been leaks
If it was easy for another corporation or hacker to steal users information from the company in question, they would no longer make profits selling the information heh. There is always the potential for a leak to occur, and when it does, you are entirely defenseless against it because "AS STATED IN PARAGRAPH 19821 OF OUR TERMS OF SERVICE, WE ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OR LOSS OF PERSONAL INFORMATION".

They will protect your information from hackers and other corporations, but not from the fucking corporations buying it from them and the damn government.

>I have absolutely nothing to hide, the only people who care are schizophrenic gun-nuts who think the government is after them
Quite sad that these individuals are indirectly agreeing to be sold similar to cattle. "You use our software for free, and as payment we sell your information which you willingly give to us :^)" Nothing is free. This argument is also fucking retarded because most people HAVE committed actions that would destroy their reputation or instigate legal action if they were to be shown to the public, they would freak the fuck out if their address and personal information was posted on the front of google, and once again they would be defenseless because "When you upload, submit, store, send or receive content to or through our Services, you give Google (and those we work with) a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works (such as those resulting from translations, adaptations or other changes we make so that your content works better with our Services), communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute such content :^)".

>They collect our information to make their services better and to cater to us, we only get the content we like to see!
This is how you subtly isolate each individual from each other, eliminate different views, cut the distribution of information, and keep individuals content so they remain docile. The inability to spend time searching for content one likes is a sign of laziness and incompetence, and refusing to adopt new views and look at content which makes you uncomfortable is ignorant.


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 20:02:43 [Preview] No. 11407 del
>>11402
OP here,

I already know hn is shit. I visit it out of habit since from time to time I stumble upon gems or general linux/bsd news. I don't read the commends. I'm just interested in the link.

Appreciate the link dump.


Anonymous 09/30/2017 (Sat) 23:19:08 [Preview] No. 11429 del
(412.19 KB 1820x772 the-tech-strategy.png)
>>11405
>This is how you subtly isolate each individual from each other, eliminate different views, cut the distribution of information, and keep individuals content so they remain docile. The inability to spend time searching for content one likes is a sign of laziness and incompetence, and refusing to adopt new views and look at content which makes you uncomfortable is ignorant.
this



(77.66 KB 954x604 noise_suppression.png)
New Xiph sound noise suppression Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 21:19:32 [Preview] No. 11410 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>This demo presents the RNNoise project, showing how deep learning can be applied to noise suppression. The main idea is to combine classic signal processing with deep learning to create a real-time noise suppression algorithm that's small and fast. No expensive GPUs required - it runs easily on a Raspberry Pi. The result is much simpler (easier to tune) and sounds better than traditional noise suppression systems (been there!).

https://people.xiph.org/~jm/demo/rnnoise/



(55.00 KB 550x439 irony.png)
WWW alternatives Anonymous 09/19/2017 (Tue) 19:57:00 [Preview] No. 11206 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
With W3C now folding to DRM and the web already being crushed under the weight of JS I think we need a discussion.

What are some alternatives to the web? I remember GNUNET implements something like websites. Basically I think we should ditch web browsers all together. BBS? Gopher?
44 posts and 9 images omitted.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:35:15 [Preview] No. 11380 del
>>11378
>mesh
Yes.
>hardware backdoors
Yes, that's another problem. This could be solved with RISC-V system on chip. The wireless device could be DASH7. Could also have a simple faraday cage, so government can't find it with EM detector, if we put it on some random place.
http://heshamelmatary.blogspot.com.au/2017/06/sel4testrisc-v-unofficial-release-priv.html
http://www.lowrisc.org/


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 23:14:12 [Preview] No. 11395 del


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 08:48:05 [Preview] No. 11397 del
>>11377
>unless they spread Jammers through the country or remove every single hardware
They could also cut the power. In this case, the device should have a solar powered battery...


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 10:05:35 [Preview] No. 11398 del
ardunel dongle


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 13:39:36 [Preview] No. 11404 del
Wifi is a really bad idea for a large-scale mesh. High latencies, interference resulting in speed drops, power hog, jewish microwaves. On the other hand, all high-speed wired solutions have no libre firmware or drivers. Everything above 1Gbit or optical is fucking proprietary. But at least optical wires don't radiate shit in all directions so CIA niggers can't find them easily.



(53.86 KB 730x595 tx1200xe.jpg)
Improving software and security Anonymous 08/11/2017 (Fri) 20:29:06 [Preview] No. 10688 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Hello my good fellows!

It is evident that the majority of mainstream software programs are shit, and while audits and the creators of a specific software program can tell one much about the quality of said software, audits can be fabricated and the user should look at the program itself instead of looking at who made it and where it came from. If more individuals studied computer engineering/science and programming and were able to audit programs, we would become stronger, and one could rest assured that their computer was tested to perfection. I have begun to notice that a major problem with auditing code is the fact that some software programs are massive and require teams to finish in a practical amount of time (Or one individual with ultimate dedication...), and this can be fixed by advocating for single purpose programs with lean code and minimal features with room for the user to build and add to it. Computers are amazing machines, and every individual with a laptop and a great mind can achieve amazing feats! One could build a self driving car with the power of programming and advanced mathematics, one can program a self-learning AI that they can interact with, one can program drones or small satellites to take pictures of the earth and predict weather patterns, and the list goes on and on.
I am here to encourage you to begin making your own single purpose programs by yourself or with close friends and a passion to teach others about programming and auditing simple software programs. I don't believe there is a government plan to keep us all down and steal our data to destroy us, but your information is worth money, and data mining allows companies to look at the big picture and advertise products.

Free(Possibly) and open source software with a single defined purpose made as minimal as possible with space to allow for building onto it and improving it.
18 posts and 8 images omitted.


Anonymous 08/14/2017 (Mon) 21:48:40 [Preview] No. 10718 del
>>10714

If regular encryption is not dead, why every rich coutries use quantum computing to secure their com?


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 02:50:32 [Preview] No. 10722 del
>>10718
""""""""""""""""""""""FUTURE PROOFING""""""""""""
(aka the lockmart strategy, buzzwords and vertical integration mixed with government contracts is an easy way to build wealth, i.e. stable investment or money laundering)


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 04:10:59 [Preview] No. 10725 del
>>10718

You have no idea what you're talking about. Go read up on:

Public-key encryption
Symmetric encryption
The integer factorization problem
The discrete logarithm problem
Shor's algorithm
Grover's algorithm


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 22:49:26 [Preview] No. 11393 del
> I don't believe there is a government plan to keep us all down and steal our data to destroy us
Yes it is, look at RSA encryption


Anonymous 09/28/2017 (Thu) 10:37:26 [Preview] No. 11401 del
>>10693
> people don't wanna even type "firefox"
I don't want to either, but it's for different reasons. Anyway the normies can do whatever they want, and we can do what we want.
> Even if some unusual surge in interest in the kind of programming you're talking about were to occur, the result would be tons of buggy, inefficient, incompatible implementations.
There doesn't have to be any big surge, and there won't be. That's because people have been brainwashed from a very young age to be consumer sheep. Only a very small minority have the interest in doing something different.
And yes, there will be incompatible implementations. So what? I'm not interested in the same hardware, OS, and languages that others here are. All that matters is that some fundamental protocols and standards are kept simple, so our individual implementations can also remain simple. That is the only critical part.



Fun with filters Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 19:45:06 [Preview] No. 11372 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I had a thought about petitioning ring or someone to put some filters on here. There are only a few of us so we can have some fun.

Rules:
Suggest words for replacement in the following format
word > replacement
Then quote the suggestion in a reply post, which acts as a vote in support.
Mods can see ID's and IP's so don't bother same fagging.
1 post omitted.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:38:40 [Preview] No. 11381 del
Skype > Skike
Windows > Telemetrydows
Photoshop > Thisapplicationdoesnotsupporttheeditingofbanknoteimages


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:44:00 [Preview] No. 11383 del
(434.38 KB 1280x1556 die.jpg)
Get out cancer. No word filters here. Here's not lainchan.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:51:54 [Preview] No. 11384 del
>>11383
Get out cancer. No word filters here. Here's not lainchan. > Please stay. I want word filters. I want to enjoy myself, like lainchan. Also I'm fucking gay.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:59:22 [Preview] No. 11387 del
>>11372
OP > faggot


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 22:25:03 [Preview] No. 11389 del
formal methods > @tedu's veiny manmeat



(45.91 KB 971x599 1.9Logo.png)
LynxChan 1.9 StephenLynx 09/20/2017 (Wed) 20:02:29 [Preview] No. 11218 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
LynxChan 1.9 is about to enter beta and introduces a very important feature: JIT caching.

JIT caching is caching pages once they are requested, instead of caching when their content is changed.

This feature should allow for not only a significant reduced CPU usage but also for a more responsive experience for users.

Other from that, this version will also add a few features:
File search on media management
Maintenance images
Ability to restart the unix socket from a GUI
Subject editing
Board locking
Better global board moderation
SSL can be made mandatory
Mass bans directly from ips

I have a small instance running it over http://lynxhub.com and a list of chans running it can be found at http://lynxhub.com/lynxchan/res/285.html
8 posts omitted.


Anonymous 09/22/2017 (Fri) 19:39:57 [Preview] No. 11266 del
>>11258
Don't worry, the new features for block bypass are used exclusively by the front-end js and nothing changed for nojs users.


Anonymous 09/24/2017 (Sun) 10:37:46 [Preview] No. 11285 del
>>11256
Wow, that's great. Thanks!


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 23:23:36 [Preview] No. 11345 del
>>11218
does it have the bumplock thread feature?


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 23:24:21 [Preview] No. 11346 del
>>11218
or hell just the lock thread feature?


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 21:31:14 [Preview] No. 11388 del
>>11345
No.

>>11346
Had it for ages now.



Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 20:48:41 [Preview] No. 11342 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I have a Playstation 3, but I don't really know what to do with it. Jailbreaking it is impossible, and this sucks. Right now it is hooked up to my CRT tv, since it is the only thing i had in house that had an analogue vudeo output, and i use it to watch netflix, Youtube, Chrunchyroll, and some old cartoons, like Rugrats, Griffin, things like that. But I feel like I've never used it at its full potential. I own it since 2013, unfortunately, before i did not own enough money to buy it by myself, so I was able to get one only by then. And I feel like I've never used too much, in the first time, I've used it a lot, but after some time, i got myself a gaming pc, so now what can I do with this ps3? I think it could be do more than just streaming movies, should I buy some games? Even if I can buy the same game on pc at less price and have it with better graphics only for the sake of having a disc?


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 00:43:20 [Preview] No. 11348 del
>>11342
>Jailbreaking it is impossible
Are you certain? I know Sony removed the OtherOS feature and has attempted to patch the firmware against exploits that allow jailbreaking, but if you don't have the latest firmware, you may be able to find an exploit.

Also, I don't believe that Sony has achieved firmware with zero security flaws, so there might be some new flaw that could be exploited. I don't know if people are still working on that, though.

If you can't jailbreak it, I think you're probably already exploiting it to the fullest, unless you haven't already set up something like MediaTomb.

Certainly, you could pick up a ton of games for the PS3, probably at bargain prices. That would be enough to keep you busy for quite some time.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:58:34 [Preview] No. 11386 del
Yeah, unless you can get GNU/Linux on that thing it's essentially an over priced brick that only plays certain discs.

I think there is some hard modding you can do but unless you can soft mod that to play pirate games it's a waste of time.



(54.61 KB 1200x678 DBfkqrOVwAAUSIl.jpg)
Amazon destroyed Seattle Anonymous 09/15/2017 (Fri) 05:17:04 [Preview] No. 11095 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I like this editorial about how Amazon has destroyed the culture of Seatle. It's a good warning: large companies destroy the culture of interesting cities and make everything generic, corporate, and dull. I wouldn't want Google's HQ in my city either.
24 posts and 6 images omitted.


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 09:49:20 [Preview] No. 11317 del
>>11289
Everything is tied to technology.
If you chose to ignore politics, then you're either condemned to not understand shit ever, or maybe is that because you already know most of the schemes, and so you chose to elevate yourself upon it.
I think that's the first choice, since the second ask for a hell of a lot of studying and book reading. And luck, whatever you call god's providence.


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 09:51:17 [Preview] No. 11318 del
>>11317

Tied to politics*


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 15:56:35 [Preview] No. 11323 del
>>11317
See the definition of the greek "techne".
Politics is not technology, although it influences it.
This this holistic vision about "everything is intertwined" is not practical in an imageboard.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 19:57:13 [Preview] No. 11375 del
(1.00 MB 3686x2458 insert-pesos.jpg)
>>11323
There is no impact of politics in a /diy/ board for exemple based on technology.
But when you're talking about companies, that have or had money from in-q-tel, and are today profiting from industrial spying, that are inserting backdoor according to a political decision of spying on everyone, not even talking about today's ultra materialist philosophy that direct everything, you know, it's pretty hard to not talk about politics/ideology. Even the FSF is promoting an ideology in itself.
But I agree that communist/trump faggots are very annoying. That's the worst of politics/ideologies.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:39:47 [Preview] No. 11382 del
>>11375
>Even the FSF is promoting an ideology in itself.
Most of us here probably don't agree with FSF philosophy.

>ultra materialist
You keep talking about this, but I don't think you understand the point of "mind-body problem", do you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicalism



(78.40 KB 500x738 altered_states.jpg)
Human experimentation should be legal? Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 03:45:32 [Preview] No. 11306 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
What do you think tech?
Should we be able to experiment with human genetic modification (CRISPR/Cas9)? Should we be experimenting with eugenics?
The child development should taken with neurogenic drugs, such as Dihexa and NSI-189? Psychedelic drugs, like Psilocybin? The effect of nutrition, as with the use of iodine, EPA/DHA and uridine?
7 posts omitted.


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 20:24:52 [Preview] No. 11341 del
>>11340
You see, that is the problem with depopulation, cognitive dissonance takes place in most individuals, they desire a less populated planet, but themselves want to procreate and have a family.

Just because we have the capabilities to feed 10 billion humans doesn't mean we should, and what happens when that 10 billion turns into a 15 billion which turns into a 30 billion because population grows logarithmically? You will see the population growth primarily occurring in 3rd world countries, most notably by Muslims who's religion allows for polygamy and encourages multiple children, and a population as large as 10 billion would only survive because of our advanced technology, it is highly unlikely for this number to be reached normally, and the technology to allow it to reach this point requires massive amounts of resources.

But I digress, attempting to grasp concepts such as this when it incorporates so much information and requires great knowledge is difficult and leads to failure.


Anonymous 09/26/2017 (Tue) 20:51:45 [Preview] No. 11343 del
>>11340
Ok, all your wall of text can be simplified on these arguments:

1- Moral principles. Human life has a essential value and we should protect it.

2- Everything is made to be sold in contemporary society. Therefore the future will be the distopy of comercialisation of life by itself.

3- Intelligence cannot be quantified.


Now, my counter-arguments:

1- Humans are different from other animals that we already use as objects? On what exacly is based your ideas of "moral"? Your philosophical principles seems to be based on some kind of metaphysical essentialism, am I right?

2- Yes. That's the point of capitalism. If you refuse to accept this reality you'll soon be defending communism ideals. Unfortunately we can't give a hug on everyone and start to sing as in Wonderland.

3- I haven't even mentioned IQ. I do not agree with the current model of intelligence quantification. Actually, most of the scientists don't agree with this too, but use it as an intermediary method of research (like the Big Five, on psychology). Inteligence can't be quantified in an precise number, no, but it's clear that there's difference between people reasoning.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 01:53:45 [Preview] No. 11355 del
(133.67 KB 600x800 Staubexplosion.jpg)
>>11306
The cat's out of the bag. Pandora's Box is opened. You can do stuff with CRISPR at home now with kits you can order online. Granted, the at-home kits don't allow you to modify human genes (it's yeast, actually), but it's a sign of how accessible and widespread this technology is becoming.

There will be (if there aren't already) clandestine labs doing human genetic engineering in places like China, Hong Kong and India. There will be mistakes; horrible monstrosities will be created along with those who have extra intelligence or athletic ability. Genetic plagues, spread by specially-engineered viruses, will become the new biowarfare.

The drug market will change a great deal. CRISPR has already allowed researchers to genetically engineer yeast to produce opioids and opioid precursors. When the technology escapes the lab, high-purity opioids will be ubiquitous and cheap. Any idiot who can brew beer will be able to brew opioids with a self-replicating organism. Rates of opioid addiction will skyrocket, but it won't matter, because people will have access to essentially unlimited quantities of high-purity dope.

CRISPR will also be used by the likes of ELF/ALF and anarcho-primitivists in an attempt to drastically reduce the human population of the earth. They'll engineer pathogens with heretofore-unseen levels of virulence and antibiotic/antiviral resistance. Billions will die, but drastic and draconian quarantine measures will still preserve a significant portion of the human population.

Enjoy yourself. It is later than you think.


Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 19:48:18 [Preview] No. 11374 del
>>11341

Who is "we"? What right have you on anyone on this planet? If you're the president of you country, then you should decide according to your land. You have nothing to say about your neighbor. You're just pointing out how this is mainly a globalist propaganda. A global problem, "we", are the people no this earth, should do something.
At the end, you only have a right on yourself. If you think that it's a good idea to sterilise, or more brutally, create a third world war to massacre the entire world, then you should be interned.

The government is rogue, and only want us enslave. I say it clear and loud, you are a debil, if you think that anything that can produce modernity have any value, and is harmless.

>requires great knowledge
You're talking about concepts that you don't understand. Why are you talking then?

>>11343
>wall of text
..
>2- Everything is made to be sold in contemporary society. Therefore the future will be the distopy of comercialisation of life by itself.
I repeated two time my point, and you still ignore it. If you think that capitalism has flaws but is a "good enough" system, because everything else is worste, then seriously, I don't know what to do.
>3- Intelligence cannot be quantified.
I never said so. Intelligence, by its modern meaning, is purely material. Everything in modernity is taken by its material, quantified side, so logically the current understanding of intelligence is only tied to a quantifiable definition. What I'm saying is you can't measure the value of any human being, since he's not only material. I'm not even going with metaphysics in mind, but can you, at least, recognize rationalism?

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



Anonymous 09/27/2017 (Wed) 20:23:40 [Preview] No. 11379 del
(71.00 KB 640x639 0.jpg)
>>11374
>thanks Marx and its mason friends
>Capitalism is worste than communism
>They'll be punished eventually. [karma or god punishment]
>Both capitalism and communism are based on the same philosophy.
ok.