/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom


ALL META DISCUSSION GOES IN THE STICKIES
Logs can be found here: https://endchan.xyz/logs.js

Expand All Images


(155.41 KB 708x331 meta 3.jpg)
Official Meta Thread #3 Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 21:36:15 Id: 5742c4 [Preview] No. 50661
All endchan.xyz/pol/ meta will go here
This thread serves as a spiritual successor to >>45414

OLD THREADS
#0 - archive.fo/zPA9W
#1 - archive.fo/cFJEA
#2 - archive.fo/rPzLu

>Does EndChan Offer Liveposting like my other favorite imageboard?
Yes enable real time at the bottom of the page.

>Are there any rules?
Follow sitewide rules. Free speech. No spam. No CP. Redpill me on 'x' belongs in QTDDTOT or search the catalog. Use sources and/or data when making a proper OP.

QTDDTOT Is no longer merged with this thread, please try and stay on topic.
Edited last time by ocelotte on 08/10/2017 (Thu) 21:36:49.


responding to some things I missed in the last thread Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 21:43:45 Id: 5742c4 [Preview] No. 50662 del
>What are limitations for posting images in here? Can we have duplicate files?
I don't mind people dodging the filter if they aren't spamming. I should turn it off.

Some images are hashbanned, I had to start using them when we were getting spammed. I think the old BO may have hashbanned some oathbreaker memes as well since there were some images already in place. I don't mind oathbreaker being posted either as long as people don't spam it.

I still need to look over >>49266 but I'm okay with most of those threads being gone and will get around to doing it some time this week.


AdolfHitler Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 22:27:02 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 50663 del
>>50662
We weren't attacked for a couple of days, besides what I highly suspect to be the fag spammer, but only half-assed bump spam. Some of it was "asdasdas" shit. Have I mentioned that I found this when looking for mods on Hearts of Iron 4? Turkish. imkampy's a turkroach.

We're getting into territory beyond coincidence.

Hash bans. I found the hash page. Have been waiting for the next attack to take the MD5s and input them.

Quite a bit of those threads mentioned are news threads about politics. I have no idea what 92ff01 has against news. Thought that was the entire point of /pol/itics.


Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 22:35:29 Id: 5742c4 [Preview] No. 50666 del
>>50663
I was more responding to the bit where he asked me to remove the threads I had already locked, the larger list includes everything from the 'zionist Internet memes' thread to a thread about China and Russia wanting to look into the chemical weapons false flag. He linked a good third of the catalog, I'm not going to do anything about it.


Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 22:37:06 Id: 5742c4 [Preview] No. 50667 del
>>50663
also next time use the ban message rather than editing posts, it's simpler and doesn't create accusations that we altered content.


Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 22:56:37 Id: 07c80f [Preview] No. 50669 del
Bumplock might fix the necro bumping issue.


AdolfHitler Anonymous 08/10/2017 (Thu) 23:27:11 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 50672 del
>>50667
Go it, will do.

>>50669
Yeah, it seems even after deleting them the bumps served their purpose.


AdolfHitler Anonymous 08/11/2017 (Fri) 17:59:26 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 50715 del
Just deleted "I'm pickle rick" the thread. Two votes from separate IDs wanting it gone. No content, just some retarded meme.


Anonymous Board volunteer 08/11/2017 (Fri) 23:54:21 Id: ecadbc [Preview] No. 50743 del
>>50715
Yea, I deleted something from that guy earlier. He was posting right at the same time the bump spammer was doing his thing, has to be the same faggot.


Anonymous 08/13/2017 (Sun) 09:49:52 Id: 2d2312 [Preview] No. 50826 del
<can you change the color of the redtext

to something a bit less eye-rapey


Anonymous 08/14/2017 (Mon) 19:13:18 Id: 937d47 [Preview] No. 50926 del
>>50826
I don't really know how to do this. It could involve changing the CSS again.

Right now I'm using the Yotsuba version that can be found on >>>/css/ - if you alter it to make it less 'eye-rapey' I may be open to updating.
I also don't see a problem with the redtext at all, what color were you thinking of making it? Just a lighter or darker red?


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 10:54:17 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 51024 del
If anyone wants the Charlottesville was a false flag thread up again, post it yourself if you don't attention-whore as the fag spammer. I personally agreed with the thread, but he's not allowed on this board. At all.

Fixed my own typo. OMG he's editing posts!
Obligatory archive: http://archive.is/iWNCB (Even though the thread is still up.)
You're all safe from post editing in the future, after Ocelotte said to stop and I agreed.
Stop crying.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 08/15/2017 (Tue) 11:15:40.


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 12:46:42 Id: 230df6 [Preview] No. 51026 del
>>51024
Can you provide an archive to the false flag thread?


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 16:26:00 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 51032 del
>>51026
Didn't archive it, but here's a news article about that:
h ttp://w ww.neonnettle.com/news/2547-charlottesville-rally-attack-exposed-as-false-flag


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 17:36:12 Id: 5c96fe [Preview] No. 51039 del
>>51024
>>51032
This thread >>50774 basically serves the same purpose tbh, all good.

edit to sign post.
Edited last time by ocelotte on 08/15/2017 (Tue) 17:37:10.


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 23:42:18 Id: 316871 [Preview] No. 51066 del
(24.83 KB 640x430 cjvob96_d.jpg)
Hey niggerspammer, I am the BO of >>>/loli/
Let me know if you would be interested in moderating it. As long as there is no CO and you follow the site 's files, I am for free speech beyond that of this new /cuckedpol/

From what I've seen, I would trust a spammer to protect free speech and be an ally of freedom and fun more than anyone else who moderates here. But I am worried about your request to delete Trump threads, which I do not at all agree with, and would like to hear your justification first. I do not believe in deleting any content or opinions, even if they're is a chance there be shilling, and the same for banning. At least make a general thread and let people argue freely there, and do let them argue with you as a moderator without threatening to ban. I think from your experiences here that you will be a more lenient moderator than someone who has not unjustly been permanently banned for going against Christians or a forum 's "consensus. "


Anonymous 08/15/2017 (Tue) 23:44:44 Id: 316871 [Preview] No. 51067 del
(110.63 KB 1189x812 1502216473498.jpg)
>>51066
*no CP.

I want someone who will not ban anyone for arguing fiercely against the grain.


Anonymous 08/16/2017 (Wed) 00:20:15 Id: 7a52fb [Preview] No. 51069 del
>>51066
You want him fucking your board with the disgusting shit he saves to his hard drive? Good luck getting a response that isn't swiftly deleted. You should try in /AM/. That mother fucker spams faggots with jizz all over their faces and fucking each other in the ass, sucking dicks. And you think he's a Loli lover? The guy threatens to murder children and is a full blown faggot. This is not about "going against Christians". This is about attacking the board.
>>>/AM/
>>51067
Absolutely no-one has been banned for "arguing fiercely against the grain".
>>50661
>Follow sitewide rules.
>Free speech.
>No spam.
>No CP.
>Redpill me on 'x' belongs in QTDDTOT or search the catalog.
>Use sources and/or data when making a proper OP.
When I moderate, these rules are followed. Those with a history of spamming that openly attention whore (ID) themselves so very easily are dealt with. No ifs, ands or buts "muh free speech" is allowed here. Spam is not. A history of spamming + attacking the BO is not. No spam. Not hard.
Edited last time by AdolfHitler on 08/16/2017 (Wed) 00:35:36.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply