/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events

Posting mode: Reply

Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

ALL META DISCUSSION GOES IN THE STICKIES | Logs can be found here: https://endchan.xyz/logs.js

Expand All Images

(5.29 MB 9921x7086 world gov.gif)
The network of international Jewry Anonymous 04/16/2017 (Sun) 15:44:58 Id: 939d56 [Preview] No. 39126
Daily reminder that your petty social squabbles, petty financial interests etc. mean absolutely nothing, and that those who control the money, control the world.

The only way to stop them is to destroy their master meme, to kill their god. Everything else is a waste of time, and will eventually be neutralized, corrupted, or incorporated into the system.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 00:50:00 Id: 939d56 [Preview] No. 39144 del
To make a point, I am going to bump this thread every time someone makes a thread about (((current events))), be it petty party politics, world events or anything else that could be considered mainstream news.

And I will continue doing so until someone can prove to me that those events are more important than the fact that this network controls pretty much every aspect of our lives, including all political parties, most "alternative" movements (pseudo-left and pseudo-right), armies, law enforcement, and most importantly, financial flows of almost every country in the world. (Well, at least western ones and their colonies).

Only once you realize that the utter destruction of it is the only way out, and that everything else, no matter how important it might seem, is just a mere distraction, will you be able to do anything about it.

No, it's not happening. It never will. Unless you make it so.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 00:52:49 Id: f38158 [Preview] No. 39145 del
We have to kill money then. It was a dumb idea to begin with.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 01:27:02 Id: 2558d2 [Preview] No. 39152 del
Money is their main rig. You can not defeat this thing without the defeating the money because money is what allows them to move the chess-pieces around. Is there an economic solution to this?

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 03:02:44 Id: e35775 [Preview] No. 39157 del
Bitcoin, for now maybe, but only to build yourself up to challenge them.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 03:27:18 Id: 198c89 [Preview] No. 39158 del
Probably wouldn't hurt to clean up some of the translations from the original French on that picture. Some of the connections being drawn here are fairly opaque. I mean, I get the point that a small number of old families and organizations control most of everything, but I'm not seeing a lot of concrete conclusions here.

There are some pretty uncomplicated ways of rendering graphs like these with Python if you wanted to take some of this work and improve on it.
h ttps://plot.ly/python/network-graphs/

Tall order. Mass adoption of non-fungible trade tokens. Bitcoin is a stab at this problem, but the recurring theme I see in cryptocurrency is the originators and early adopters amassing massive proportions of the currency before general public adoption (by design). This brings you back to the fundamental problem of currencies used now which is a small number of hands controlling the majority of the supply. Even if you did convince most of the world to adopt something like BTC, you would just make Satoshi a Rothschild equivalent and he'd end up pulling the same bullshit. Muh goooooold also has this problem.

Personally, I don't see a solution that isn't ultimately imposed by a state or government. Dollars are obviously a scam, but we use them because their adoption is legally enforced. An agoristic or alt-currency approach is a non-starter because on tax day, you better have some dollars to give the feds or you're going to prison. If you want dollars, you have to trade or labor on the terms set by the man printing the dollars.

As sophomoric as it may sound, NatSoc is the only answer I can come up with. Government whose only purpose is the empowerment of the people and whose form and methods are defined by the ability to serve that purpose, can impose simple, effective solutions. There are some pretty compelling arguments from Modern Monetary Theory about how currencies should be created and used h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory

I'm oversimplifying, but if you can't project real power (that is, if you can't say "do as I say, or I'll fuck you up" and mean it), then you can't fix the problem. The monetary system is just a proxy for power projection in this era of the commodification of everything. When you have enough good men and guns, though, the problem of old banking families is simple . . . you just kill them and confiscate their property.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 15:03:07 Id: 148a83 [Preview] No. 39218 del
Money needs to have value and it can't be easily counterfeited. If a small group of men have the power to print all the money they want and people are forced to pay taxes and trade commodities in this currency, then that small group will have unlimited wealth.

Really, though, it's not even the money that gives them power, because it's their network of spies, assassins, and advisers that give them the power to print the money. Teamwork is what allows them to dominate us.

And we're never going to get rid of money because money is too useful to do without. We need money that is under our control.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 23:59:21 Id: 939d56 [Preview] No. 39346 del
Money is just a representation of power. It's the consequence, not the cause. Their power, and the value of their money, is almost entirely psychological (memetic). Destroy the perceived value of their money, stop them from transferring that value into something else (that's equally financially liquid) and you have rendered them completely powerless.

Psychological conditioning can do wonders, it can make people blow themselves up for the moon god, it can make them prostitute themselves for a piece of paper. How silly is that?

They can easily transfer their wealth into bitcoin

Great idea. Well, even if some of those organizations are not directly connected, they are bound to cooperate due to mutual interest. And that's another trick to their rule. Once you set up a proper "pyramid" (a meta-meme), it's easy to get individuals and organizations drawn into it through sheer inertia of political, financial etc. interests. It's a mathematical model. Everything is. And the only way to counter it is to create an inverse pyramid which would cancel it out.

And that brings us to the question of how to create such a government, that would be immune to the old world order and it's overwhelming influence.

Anonymous 04/21/2017 (Fri) 04:33:45 Id: 4542dd [Preview] No. 39486 del
How do we create that government? I think it will rely heavily on some deus ex machina. I really don't see a path to victory that doesn't involve the degradation of extant control infrastructure. Maybe you could come up with a really popular and infectious narrative that whips people into total fanaticism about the well being of their people. I think if you love who you are, respect where you come from and care about where you're going, some kind of revolutionary-right ideology follows. I don't know how you make that happen, though. You would have to be similar to what Christianity was for Rome. Except instead of self-abnegation and liberation-theology, you have duty, honor and kinship.

Assuming the one meme to rule them all is beyond our ability to craft, then we just have to ensure some of our people survive the extermination attempts once Jewish power becomes absolute (like they did in Eastern Europe in the early 20th century). Fortunately, the governments of the west will become less effective at killing their host population as whites decline/become disenfranchised (3rd worlders have low drive and intelligence, Jewish administrators always prioritize grifting over productive work).

If you want my honest opinion, I don't think we will succeed. I think we are living in the dawn of a new Dark Age and life will grow harder and shorter for future generations. If enough of us survive to have a viable nation, I think that the cycle will repeat and we will have our time in the sun again, albeit in 1000 years time.

Or you make a virus that wipes out Saudis and Yids and our schools stop turning promising children into broken, dysfunctional adults. Then within one generation we will go back into living with purpose and seek our destiny to master new worlds among distant stars.

Anonymous 04/21/2017 (Fri) 04:51:56 Id: a9dae4 [Preview] No. 39488 del
>those who control the money, control the world.
Cynical deconstructionist kike bullshit. It's ideological not about money.

Anonymous 04/21/2017 (Fri) 15:16:21 Id: a6b201 [Preview] No. 39500 del
Progress to banking will come from making the Jews drop their religion of double-standards.

"Do not charge interest on the loans you make to a fellow Israelite, whether you loan money, or food, or anything else. You may charge interest to foreigners, but you may not charge interest to Israelites, so that the LORD your God may bless you in everything you do in the land you are about to enter and occupy." Deutronomity 23:13

Anonymous 04/22/2017 (Sat) 05:26:04 Id: 518b19 [Preview] No. 39578 del
All tariffs are basically double standards with that logic. The problem is that the international Jew controls other nations while the real people of a nation don't control themselves, their sovereignty is usurped by an outside force. Free trade isn't the answer, neither are keynesian, austrian, and communist economics.

Anonymous 04/22/2017 (Sat) 08:48:11 Id: 939d56 [Preview] No. 39581 del
Ok, tell me then:

1. How many people you know that have any ideology whatsoever

2. How many of them would pick that ideology instead of million dollars

It's more likely that whites need to drop kike sand religions that implicitly or explicitly make them worship kikes and their tribal deities.

You can technically have Jews as rulers of every isolationist country. They like authoritarianism as much as they like "democracy" , maybe even more because it allows them to show their true face (See the red terror or CIA backed neocon dictators like Pinochet or modern corporate shills).

Anonymous 04/27/2017 (Thu) 10:46:09 Id: 939d56 [Preview] No. 39939 del

Anonymous 04/27/2017 (Thu) 22:47:25 Id: 1fd604 [Preview] No. 39965 del
(96.61 KB 1218x685 0.jpeg)
>Is there an economic solution to this?
What did Hitler fight for if people can't even remember how he turned things around so miraculously?
>We need money that is under our control.
They printed their own and got rid of the gold standard, because Germany had no gold left.
>How do we create that government?
All it needs is one decent, honest and loyal leader with a similar party behind him. Also, the economy has to fall so deep into the gutter and the value of the dollar so bad that it takes more than a wheelbarrow to carry the money for a single loaf of bread. Then you just need a coup. When that reaches national attention, the people will rally behind the speaker. Especially if he's public about the wickedness of those previously in power.
>make a virus that wipes out Saudis and Yids
A genetic virus sounds good on text, but is it scientifically possible? They've been using their own cultural assimilation to eliminate us. White men in their basements or weeaboos against "3DPig", as men of other races take the white women.

Anyway, Hitler didn't do "nothing" wrong. In my studies of his history, he wanted peace way too badly and stalled too many times, attempting to broker peace with the warmongering nations. He could have drafted soldiers from every single conquest, easily blitzkrieged through England and then conscript them, and then take their entire might against Russia. They were winning at first, before reinforcements arrived. Then conscript Russian forces + English + Japanese + Italian + German drafted civilians against the United States. If he actually did gas the Jews (which he obviously didn't), none would've been around to complain. Finally, Israel should've been his prime target.

Read or audio book Mein Kampf. Learn how Hitler thought.

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply