/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Political discussion of ideology, history, and [current] events

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Logs can be found here: https://endchan.xyz/logs.js

Expand All Images

(737.41 KB 780x1024 428973287432.jpg)
9/11 Anonymous 04/02/2017 (Sun) 22:26:13 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 36691
Why They Didn't Use Planes

Sometimes people ask me "why would they use missiles or whatever and
run the risk of being caught out ? If they're going to sell a story about
planes, why not make it as convincing as possible and use real planes" ?

It's a silly question, because in the face of direct visual and forensic proof
that they didn't use planes (mostly supported by what little witness evidence
we have), speculations about their thinking and planning are meaningless.

Nevertheless, since we live in extremely silly times, I'm going to address
this question on its own terms.

Put yourself in the position of the perps. You have to think through what
could go wrong in each possible scenario and then decide which scenario
poses the smallest risk.

You want to sell a story about hijacked planes.

At the first level of decision making, you have two choices.

1) Actually use planes.

2) Use missiles or whatever the blobs 11 thing is, and convince people that
they were planes.

Lets first look at the second scenario. You have the media on your side to
tell the story. What could go wrong?

1) Witnesses might see that they were not planes and report it.

Well this has actually happened, but it seems that nobody takes any notice.
The myth of "thousands of witnesses" to a big plane strike keeps getting
trotted out on the basis of a circular assumption. "Because big jets were
there, then people must have seen them - because people saw them, that
proves they were there."

Clearly the perps thought about how to minimize the problem of contrary
witness reports, and came up with a simple but effective plan.

This problem is easy to minimize. The first strike happens, and because the
object is small and fast and unexpected, no-one is too sure what it is, or
whether they saw it correctly. A few witness reports go to air reporting
missiles or small planes or no craft at all, but there is only an 18 minute
window for this to occur before the whole world sees a big jet live on TV -
using commercially available real time animation technology. This distracts
the media from interviewing many witnesses to the second strike, because
everyone is fixated on the video replay. Those few witnesses who might get
a moment with the media, then lack confidence in what they saw, because
once again, the object was small, fast and unexpected. Seeing the TV
replay - which was instantly available - would make most people think that
they just didn't see it properly. The few who remain unshakable in their
belief that it was not a large plane are easily shouted down and drowned
out by the endless replays. In addition the airlines release a statement
saying that they've lost two big jets and any witness dissent is *instantly* -
the moment the second strike happens - marginalized almost to the point of

This is not speculation. Read through the transcripts of broadcasts as they
unfolded between about 8.47 and 9.30 and you will see that this is *exactly*
what happened. From the moment the second strike occurred, anyone who
tried to say that it was not a large jet immediately had a TV replay shoved in
their face.

What little witness evidence was gathered in the brief time available
between the two strikes was not enough to do any real damage, and
everything after that was corrupted by everybody having TV replays of the
second jet shoved in their face as soon as they opened their mouths.

In that brief period between the two strikes, there was only one witness who
said a large jet - and that just happened to be the vice prez of CNN, which
of course is a major player in the scam - just as pivotal as the govt.

So we can see that the problem of contrary witnesses, while a minor
inconvenience is easily overcome with some good planning.

Again, this is not speculation. The successful execution of this plan has
been tested ion the real world - and it works. The scenario I have outlined
exactly fits with the documented record of the events.

Once the sheeple factor sets in, everyone

Anonymous 04/02/2017 (Sun) 22:29:41 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 36692 del
Once the sheeple factor sets in, everyone is chanting "what about the
people who saw it ? " without ever bothering to check what those people
actually did report. And if they do check, the numbers of reports are not
high enough to inflict major damage on the official story. What little there is
overwhelmingly supports something other than a big jet, but there wasn't
enough time to gather enough numbers for this to be a significant evidence
factor. And as for the ordinary person on the street - most of them would be
easily convinced that they just didn't see it properly. Some might have
lingering doubts or suspicions, but would be quickly silenced by ridicule and
denial from the overwhelming pressure of the TV footage, and the whole
world trying to convince them that they just didn't see it properly. Most
would eventually come to believe that themselves.

So - that problem is easily dealt with. No cover story solves everything, and
doubtless there are still some mutterings of doubt and suspicion amongst
some people who were there, but it isn't enough to cause a serious

Now to the other problem.

Someone might look at the videos and see what's really there. Which is
exactly what Rosalee has done. And people just go into mind controlled
denial. The alternative media is flooded with endless debunkers. The perps
knew our collective psychology well. They certainly wouldn't be happy with
the groundswell of awareness which Rosalee has kick-started, but it looks
very manageable compared to the problems I'm about to outline with the
strategy of using real jets.

Again, this is not speculation. The way that both of these problems have
been handled has been tested in the real world, fits exactly with the
documented record, and the fact that I am even needing to write this, 3
years after Rosalee first busted the video evidence, is testimony to how
wisely the perps judged the choice of strategy.

Now lets look at the other choice - using real jets.

This immediately splits into two sub-choices 1) Pilot them with suicide pilots
2) Remote control them.

The problem with the first choice is obvious and I think most people on this
list have already accepted the absurdity and the monstrous difficulties of
such a scenario, so I won't go into them here.

Remote control.

Before addressing the problems with that, the scenario splits into more -

1) Hijack a real flight with real passengers aboard. 2) Launch a plane from
somewhere else and pass it off as a real flight.

Basically, the choices here split into the option of crashing a plane with
passengers aboard or with no passengers aboard. Both possibilities create
potentially insurmountable problems in the cover up - and a reduced
likelihood of the crash being successfully targeted to begin with.

Let's look at the latter problem. While it's certainly feasible to remote control
a large jet into the towers, it's a high precision targeting job for an aircraft
with very limited maneuverability. There's a significant risk that the plane
won't hit its target properly. That it will hit some other building, just clip its
wing on the tower and crash into the streets or cause a cascade of damage
on other non targeted buildings, miss altogether and finish up in the
Hudson, still reasonably intact - all kinds of risks.

Anonymous 04/02/2017 (Sun) 22:30:50 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 36693 del
Whatever the calculated likelyhood of a successfully targeted crash, it
would have to be significantly lower than that of a missile or blobs- thing,
which is specifically engineered for such precision strikes.

Even the smallest increase in risk of the target not being hit properly would
be completely unacceptable, given the easily manageable nature of any
problems associated with the alternative scenario.

And missing the target is only the beginning of the problem. What about the
aftermath ? Once it misses the target, there's a significant risk that the
aircraft may crash in such a manner that it's reasonably intact. Rescue
workers and emergency services who are completely innocent of the scam,
and ordinary people wanting to help out are going to reach the wreckage
before any perpsters, given that where it crashed couldn't be foreseen.

And what are they going to find ? Two choices. A plane with no -one in it.
How are the perps going to explain that, huh ? Or a plane with passengers.
This raises even more problems. Using a plane with passengers creates
two more sub-choices.

1) Hope that all the passengers get killed in the crash, so there's no
survivors to talk or hope that the perps can get to them first and knock them
off before they do talk.

2) Kill them before the crash with a timed release of gas into the aircon
system. Which of course leaves more forensic evidence to cover up, when
the bodies are examined. Imagine the massive operation needed to get
enough perps swarming over the wreckage quickly enough to control what
the media,innocent rescue workers or survivors would start blabbing before
the spin sets in. Far worse than anything a few witnesses could say in the
18 minutes between the two tower strikes.

These problems are not limited to the scenario of the aircraft not crashing
as they were meant to. If the planes were successfully crashed into the
towers, its still possible - although not very likely - that there could be
survivors. Nevertheless, even assuming that everyone was killed, real
crashes with real people leave real bodies, they don't just vapourize like in
the S11 cartoon. So you have hundreds of retrievable bodies to worry
about. If they were killed with gas prior to the crash, then you have the
same forensic cover up nightmare as in the scenario where the plane
misses its target.

Anonymous 04/02/2017 (Sun) 22:31:22 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 36694 del
And if you avoid this problem by hoping that everyone is killed in the crash,
you face the horrible risk that there will be dozens of survivors to try to shut
up - unlikely if the plane hits the target properly - but you don't know that for

In addition, real planes leave real wreckage - unlike the S11 cartoon - which
means real flight recorder boxes to be found and more stuff to hush up,
involving more innocent officials to pressure. Of course, enormous pressure
can be brought to bear, but the problem is how much would spill out before
the spin gets into action. All of this is far worse than what a few witnesses
could say in the 18 minutes between the strikes, and what a marginalized
researcher can post on her website, hoping that people take notice.

As you can see, the scenario of using real planes creates a logistical
nightmare compared to the piddling problem of a few witnesses to the craft,
and easily marginalized conspiracy nuts analyzing video - easily
suppressed by a compliant media.

In committing a crime, the idea is to leave as little mess as possible,
because every bit of mess is a potential clue. Even in the event of a
successfully targeted crash, real aircraft, scattering wreckage and bodies
everywhere creates an enormous amount of mess to cover up compared to
the relatively neat problem of a few witnesses and a few conspiracy nuts
trying to tell people what the video shows.

The problems of the real plane scenario are enormously compounded by
the possibility of a botched crash, which itself is a significantly increased risk
when using big lumbering jets not specifically designed for that task as
opposed to precision weaponry which is far more reliable. In the unlikely
event of a missile going off course, there would be far less mess to leave
clues, and an easier co-opting into a plan B story - like terrorists stealing
missiles and firing them at NY.

This explanation should hopefully put an end once and for all to the plane
hugging fantasy - but then, these are very silly times in which we live.

Anonymous 04/02/2017 (Sun) 22:41:56 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 36701 del
All witnesses to first "plane" are jews and media members. check video

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=HuB4jLAuVLk

Anonymous 04/09/2017 (Sun) 16:15:54 [Preview] No. 38492 del
Nice write-up OP.

Anonymous 04/09/2017 (Sun) 17:03:44 Id: 068600 [Preview] No. 38500 del
This is impressive stuff. I don't care what your detractors say, you guys are easily the future premium pol. I just hope newfaggots have learned to lurk by the time they find this place.

Anonymous 04/09/2017 (Sun) 20:11:06 Id: 5bc7b8 [Preview] No. 38523 del
Thanks OP. I'm going to save this.

Anonymous 04/16/2017 (Sun) 15:12:01 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39119 del

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 19:34:51 Id: 578750 [Preview] No. 39233 del
Little is it known that intelligence structures are so fickle: We can assume the US military/CIA operate at the highest levels of strategic evaluation.

Now let's think like /k/ for a second to truly exemplify the nature of this thought experiment. Two men enter a hostile environment, a building, one is a highly trained operator with years of experience and the other is some rebellious insurgent of whatever orientation, with little to no training at all.
Which of the men is more predictable given high level observation?

It's an interesting thing that a lie can be seen by looking at the motive of the liar, context is thus equally as important.

Unfortunately my assertion must be left open - How would the CIA hide it's motives when they're so obviously 100% infallibly Zionist? Every spook is Jewish! The entire CIA are Israeli operatives! Remember that jews control the world and the CIA is their unthinking dog, so the CIA doesn't have motives to look for! Pay attention to Zionism!

How convenient.

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 22:48:06 Id: 2f78d0 [Preview] No. 39242 del
What are the blob 11 things you're referring to?

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 22:51:52 Id: c02ffa [Preview] No. 39243 del
Didn't they use those unmarked drones? The grey one?

Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 23:50:19 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39248 del
It's referring to the NBC live shot and others. see vid (watch the whole documentary it will blow your mind).

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Hw8sJE3R0

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 01:15:21 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39261 del
The No Planes theory is disinfo, a plane was used, but it's no ordinary plane. The No Planes theory only works on the Pentagon which I'll give them that.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 01:18:25 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39262 del
h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=wF-Rp4W_ABE
h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=gV4rvTxcMSY

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:05:21 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39271 del

the perps wouldn't use planes at one location and not use planes at another. it fucks up the coverup. you obviously didn't read the op. take your shilling elsewhere.

debunk something said in the op or fuck with your shitty videos which disprove nothing ive said or posted.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:17:27 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39274 del
You don't "own" this thread, the planes used to the twin towers are remote controlled while WTC7 exploded with a planned demolition and much later after each controlled plane hit the twin towers, it is then the explosives were used to obliterate the towers. Just because MOSSAD knew was was coming by filming the plane at the ideal locations doesn't mean there weren't any planes used.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:28:38 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39276 del
sorry, mossad didn't film anything. the images of "planes" shown on tv were computer generated. it leaves nothing to chance and they could control what images are shown to the public. your scenario is too risky for the perps. it's much easier to shoot missiles at buildings, tell everyone it was planes, and control the images shown on the media. do more research.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:32:16 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39278 del
whoops, I meant each tower of the twin towers exploded after a plane hit it, MOSSAD had Israeli art students putting up C4 in certain parts of the building.

The QRS-11 Gyrochip was used in those Boeing airplanes. Whether or not the planes that hit the towers were the supposedly hijacked planes, I don't know but there's theories that claim that the planes that hit the towers merely switched places with the actual planes that went off to some government airport, sort of like the actual Malaysian Airlines airplane went to Diego Garcia while the fake one is used in the crash.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:35:51 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39279 del
You didn't even see the video didn't you? An actual airplane engine was found on the streets that can be verified to be one of the falling fireballs that came from the impact of the engine. The airplane used were reinforced with a special armor that can penetrate the steel better than any other plane. You are overly rationalizing the situation instead of looking at the evidence and you are a rookie.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:42:07 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39281 del
Again, look how complicated your scenario is compared to just controlling the media narrative using computer generated images. plane switching? ok...

and ya engines can be planted thats not proof of anything. so i guess the terrorist passports that miraculously were found were true too. get real, youre the rook.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:53:02 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39282 del
The engine isn't planted, you dingus. The claim made is that it's a 767 engine when it's clearly from a 747 engine, which means flight 175 wasn't the one that hit the tower. To claim that it was planted there is a huge bullshit ad hoc explanation. By the way, they didn't have instantaneous LIVE Augmented Reality to be overlayed on the actual footage, and any so called proof that they did used computer generated images themselves try to use computer generated images to make things "relative" and so the no planes hit the towers theory is a huge diversion from the fact that they can and had done this.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:02:10 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39283 del
>engines cant be planted because i say so

again, so there is verifiable proof that they planted evidence around the scene (terrorist passports, bandanas, etc.), but to suggest an engine is planted is absurd.

and so in your scenario they had people work on some mystery plane and install reinforced steel so it can fly into the building? But at some point planes were switched or something. sounds stupid and creates more evidence complicating a coverup.

you're wrong, deal with it.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:05:14 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39284 del
In other words, the US government was hiding the fact that engine was from a 747 since it really is an engine that fell from impact of the tower, while they've hid the evidence in Staten Island instead of using it as proof that a 767 was actually used. The planes that hit the towers are at the very least, not the planes that were supposedly used. Saying that this is too complicated and trying to simplify what's going on, people like you will never understand nor accept probable conclusions. The no planes hit the twin towers theory can't explain what happened to the passengers without saying that they've never existed, which would mean those families of those passengers have to be faked. The terrorists are fake, we all know that. The official narrative is bullshit, but not everything is a lie, some elements of truth are here and there which are needed to keep people fooled into thinking it wasn't a controlled setup.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:10:01 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39285 del
To keep people guessing long enough by using a very sophisiticated black op false flag event by using actual planes for the towers, missile for the pentagon, and faked airplane crashes missing too many stuff is to deliberately make multiple layers of diversion so that the actual narrative won't get out to the public fast enough to justify a pre-emptive strike. People like you only know a tiny fraction of the bigger story.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:11:23 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39286 del

ya, the passengers were faked. can you deal with that? ever heard of the holocaust? jews have a long history of faking victims to further there goals. the families are crisis actors. it's not complicated.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:20:42 Id: 2f78d0 [Preview] No. 39288 del
I'm gonna have to say the no planes stuff is disinfo used to discredit other, actually valid critiques of the official 9/11 narrative. With the Pentagon I'm kinda inclined to believe that a cruise missile painted up to look like an aircraft or something similar was used just because of the basically impossible flight path the aircraft took prior to hitting the Pentagon. But I'm not buying it in regards to the twin towers.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:21:16 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39289 del
My explanation can allow either faked or not faked scenarios, but yours can't. Mines have an more leeway as to what happened, yours don't. Objectively speaking, mines is superior because I don't make assumptions. The Holocaust was a Holohoax, but that doesn't mean there weren't any Jews in the labor camps, there's more proof that they were there, and there's some honest Jews that made it out alive that testified that they didn't gas the Jews, it was just mere sanitation protocol of chaving hair, getting washed, changing into new clothes just like anyone in the military goes through. Some Jews did die in the labor camps from typhus and from starvation, but those numbers are around 5 digits. To say that absolutely no Jews died in the labor camps is complete utter bullshit since that would mean they didn't even use the incinerator at all, and that there's no typhus at all as well.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:25:43 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39290 del
ya, your explanation has more leeway because you don't know what the fuck youre talking about. 9/11 was no planes, fake victims, CGI...if you don't want to do the research thats fine im not here to hold your hand. cheers.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:29:50 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39292 del
You've admitted that there were no Jews that died in labor camps, that's really not the claim actual honest researchers come to, while you apply that false principle to 9/11. I guess nobody in the towers died as well because all those victims are faked, CGI, people that jumped out of the windows were faked, etc.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:33:30 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39294 del
Here's some other good stuff that's actually worth watching, though OP being a faggot would reject much of the following: h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UyynjxAyw h ttps://youtu.be/quYYA1wtUwc h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:33:32 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39295 del
>You've admitted that there were no Jews that died in labor camps

i did no such thing. i said there were fake victims. am i lying? now youve resorted to lying to try and discredit me. you can fuck off now.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:35:57 Id: a03728 [Preview] No. 39296 del
Common sense would dictate that planes weren't used, because there are a bazillion things that can go wrong from takeover of plane to plane ending up in tower. Missiles make much more sense. Of course, one would have to prove that individuals on flight manifests didn't exist. I don't have that evidence. All said and done, missiles are far, far more likely to hit intended targets than passenger planes are.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:36:29 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39297 del
This is the same tier of bullshit you had made against me. I was merely following your line of logic to show how absurd you are, reductio ad absurdum. All you've done is repeat yourself ad nauseum. Where's the proof that the passengers were all faked? There's no concrete evidence whatsoever. Until you have evidence for it, you can't make assumptions.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:39:22 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39298 del
the fact there were no planes is proof the passengers didn't exist. there's actually a lot of research on this. if you were a serious 9/11 researcher you would know that. youve been caught misrepresenting my position already so i know youre a jew shill trying to muddy the waters with your complicated bullshit. you can fuck off now.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:41:51 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39299 del
yup, it's a precision target. believing in planes is fucktarded.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:46:29 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39300 del
You are repeating yourself again.

My theory is the most plausible, that these planes used were military/remotely controlled planes, There's nothing against my theory that either there were passengers going on actual planes but had gone somewhere else, or the passengers might had been in the airplanes except some of the airplanes are simply not what they seem to actually had been the correct model used. This would help some people to understand what might had happened but again, nothing definitive: h ttps://letsrollforums.com//happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?s=cd848af7045397fe3df7f13d4c90d8bd&

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:50:00 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39301 del
wow, another complicated, intricate, convoluted theory to try and prove your position when a more simpler explanation that leaves less evidence for the perps against a coverup is more plausible. what a fuckin surprise.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 03:57:40 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39302 del
There's nothing complicated nor all that new about this theory at all, it's still within the line of logic that I've been presenting all this time. When dealing with what cannot be truly fully ever to be known, anything goes, and everything needs to be approached with the inductive method because at face level, the official narrative is the most simplistic of them all, bad guys hate 'Murrica, they hit a plane into buildings, 'Murrica should stop these people from doing these things to themselves, therefore, 'Murrica should be interventionists and fix Afganistan for the innocent people in Afganistan being oppressed by such "terrorists". That's the real no brainer Occam's razor conclusion that people come to. You are not consistent with your inconsistent line of logic that you're using to justify your assertions.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:02:51 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39304 del
>official narrative is the occams razor conclusion

wow youve gone full retard. i wish you well.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:08:28 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39305 del
Again, that was redictio ad absurdum, I'm saying that your deductive methodology in making absolute statements concerning things that we don't even know the true story behind 100% is the folly of using deductive logic to claim your logic is 100% hardcore empirical evidence of the no planes hit the Twin Towers theory. I don't make 100% claims, and I don't heavily base my methodology as "evidence" when dealing with history that requires ontological evidence, not epistemological deductions that leads to absolute claims to know what truly happened.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:11:56 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39306 del
>i dont make 100% claims

well of course you dont, because you dont know what the fuck youre talking about. i have confidence in the truth, so i state what's a fact and what's not a fact. you muddy the waters because you're too stupid to figure it out and dont want to admit when youre wrong. thanks.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:19:37 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39308 del
What you've just said is what every gatekeeper, guru, cult leader, politician, etc., claims omniscience over a very specific subject. Your "confidence" is 100%, which then leads to question what affirms this 100% confidence, which is your trust in your supposedly infallible logic, and then claim that your logic is infallible because you have infallible logic. This is the kind of pseudo intellectuals that plague all of humanity, people that think that they know the truth yet they actually don't know what they think they know is merely their own assertion, belief, faith.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:26:12 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 39309 del
that's cool. believe what you want.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:32:41 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 39310 del
Congrats, your line of logic is also what Flat Earthers make. Peace out.

Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 18:22:48 Id: 49cdeb [Preview] No. 39336 del
>Every spook is Jewish!

Jewish and Irish.

Anonymous 04/19/2017 (Wed) 10:30:35 [Preview] No. 39364 del
>So you have hundreds of retrievable bodies to worry about.
You know, sometimes I wonder if many of these staged attacks with missing victims is just a method of faking people's death “for the record”, essentially allowing them to add names when some of those people are still very alive and well, but now living under a different persona. I rarely ever see people looking in to the victim's of most events.

It's interesting that multiple outlets seemed to use the same video from different perspectives. I remember watching a video someone made where he analyzed all the possible flight paths using various videos (I think some were from different angles) and was comparing it to the two recorded flight paths (The "official" flight path and the military flight path). I don't remember the guy's name or the video at the moment but he had re-created a 3d model of NYC and everything.

>The airplane used were reinforced with a special armor that can penetrate the steel better than any other plane.

This can't be true. There's no way they would spend time and money attempting to re-engineer an airplane designed to carry passengers and freight by remaking the entire outer shell to be harder and stronger. Even if they managed to equate it to the same weight as a fully loaded jet while leaving it empty of any passengers/cargo, a hollow hardened tube would be much less effective than something more solid. You're basically saying they re-engineered a plane to be more like a missile, why wouldn't they just use a missile instead?

Anonymous 05/11/2017 (Thu) 13:28:50 Id: b30892 [Preview] No. 41898 del
You're casually forgetting the facts that the airplane engine fell from the sky and that there were eyewitness accounts which were suppressed proving the twin towers was hit by something that at least looked like an airplane. You're also forgetting that the towers had WINDOWS, and last but not least, that there's a pod beneath the airplane of flight 175 h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=huK0MAb0Xa4 yet I think most of you are so stupid for not knowing that thermite and c-4's are not enough to get the twin towers fall like it did way below ground level, that required an underground nuclear explosion. The walls surrounding the hole left at ground zero were concave. Who the fuck cares about the plane when the biggest problem is the demolition technique, the high radiation after the explosion (no thermite isn't the cause of it), and who really set everything (no it's not just the Jews).

Anonymous 05/18/2017 (Thu) 06:03:03 Id: 7473fa [Preview] No. 43090 del
I love this OP

Anonymous 05/18/2017 (Thu) 11:44:57 Id: fc7161 [Preview] No. 43108 del

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 06:48:06 Id: 3f766a [Preview] No. 43439 del
yeah all of the videos of the planes are very poorly made and discredit eachother. whether there were planes or not, all of the videos depicting planes are clearly fraudulent

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 08:06:45 [Preview] No. 43452 del
Too much Scaffolding. I think the world trade center was meant to be demolished so they can implement a forced way of trade(rfid mark of the beast etc.)

controlled chaos is what it was

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 09:12:38 Id: 8594a9 [Preview] No. 43454 del
>Fuck you I've researched it on youtube
>Fuck you I've watched more youtube than you
I love you /pol/, never change

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 09:43:56 [Preview] No. 43455 del
Fuck you op. How about spending time on solving the various issues of the kike problem we've got? You're wasting your time and our time on how 9/11 was pulled off rather than how we're going to deal with these fucking kikes.

All of you faggots wasting time on this shit are being entertained. Why not go masturbate or smoke some crack? The end result is the same. We still have kikes running around fucking over all non-jews around the globe.

Solve that you faggot OP.

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 10:27:42 Id: 8594a9 [Preview] No. 43456 del
who is this 'we' you're talking about?

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 12:23:40 Id: 22cd30 [Preview] No. 43459 del
So?o now that media is all being portrayed as fake by the us gov't why don't they come out with these stories in retaliation? We played your game but u won't play our fuck you and your "narrative"

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 13:32:07 [Preview] No. 43462 del
(347.36 KB 525x518 p.png)
9/11 implies race traitors acting with jews as either a shadow government a deep state and or a secret society or globalist faction. 9/11 was their mini shoa to get you to walk under metal detecting arches. Maybe you might have to walk under a guillotine because there is invisible jews kike-lings members or understudies of the jewish mafia known as the Judaeo-masonic faction. The 2 towers is their calling card the pink rabbit banksters and the kikes that changed their names and all the race traiting elitists have started another pointless war on a concept. The war on terror. The color chart saying if it is happening or not all of it is mind control predicated on dark luciferianism. Essentially the secret frat royalty boomers that wear those cloaks that have eyeholes in the hood are in charge of the controlled false flag narratives and these people are invisible jews. a rotten hand rubbing handshake between schlomo and joe blow.

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 13:59:19 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 43463 del
Every continent, everywhere.

Anonymous 05/20/2017 (Sat) 14:48:42 Id: 8594a9 [Preview] No. 43475 del
(134.12 KB 1000x563 unnaground.jpg)
i was just checking good luck anon

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 01:03:05 Id: ca0556 [Preview] No. 43566 del
(588.09 KB 860x547 1495249108076.png)
Bruh they used drone predecessor technology owned by the israelis

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 18:51:36 [Preview] No. 43652 del
The 9/11 desinfo thread

>I'm gonna have to say the no planes stuff is disinfo used to discredit other, actually valid critiques of the official 9/11 narrative.


>With the Pentagon I'm kinda inclined to believe that a cruise missile painted up to look like an aircraft or something similar was used just because of the basically impossible flight path the aircraft took prior to hitting the Pentagon. But I'm not buying it in regards to the twin towers.

It is not impossible, just very difficult even unlikely “lucky hit”, for “pilots who didn't wanted to learn to land”. Hitting the pentagon was like a very precision landing on the spot. A little bit too early and it would have buried into the lawn, a little bit too late and it would have skidded over the roofs.

The very, very suspicious circumstance is, there is no film, video, photo, not even bad CCTV, showing a plane closing in the Pentagon. The released Pentagon CCTV footage does not show a plane, just an explosion.

This is BTW a strong argument against “it's all CGI”.

>And if you avoid this problem by hoping that everyone is killed in the crash,
you face the horrible risk that there will be dozens of survivors

Smashing a plane at high speed into the ground, building, there will be no survivors.

>The airplane used were reinforced with a special armor that can penetrate the steel better than any other plane.

There is no need to “reinforce“ a plane to smash it on a building. Overcomplicated bullshit.

>computer generated images
>By the way, they didn't have instantaneous LIVE Augmented Reality to be overlayed on the actual footage,

This is New York, you can't control the witnesses, nor who is filming the event. Twin towers were a major tourist attraction.

> there is verifiable proof that they planted evidence around the scene (terrorist passports, bandanas, etc.)

“Verifiable proof” is a big word for odd occurrence, you have no evidence how it happened.

I call such claims “poisoning the well”, desinfo. Easily debunkable claims attached to really suspicious evidence, so the evidence, hard facts falls into disregard.

bad bad photoshop, Jokker

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 19:45:30 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43662 del
>just an odd occurence
h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=2rXZnoGyL-4

can't wait for your next deliberate obstinate response which ignores the flawless arguments in the OP.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 19:53:28 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43664 del
the indestructible passport which conveniently proves that the hijackers exist.
h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=RtCvWG-4OeA
>just an odd occurrence

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 20:00:41 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43665 del
no blackbox data ever released but bandanas and passports surviving is cool
>just an odd occurrence

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=rcuAZs3kYzs

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 20:15:50 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43668 del

1. "At that point we were still not sure that it was a plane that had hit the tower. There was some talk from the civilians coming down that a plane hit. The consensus was that it was a small plane."- Credited to: Roy Chelson

2. “Numerous civilians were telling me that a plane had hit the building. There were discrepancies as to the type of plane. Some were saying it was a Cessna or Lear jet type, a small jet plane. Some said it was a large passenger plane. One person actually said that it was like a military style plane that actually shot missiles into the building”. - Credited to: Anthony Bartolomey

3. “I saw it come up from the left, and I saw the plane coming through to the building, go inside, a small plane….no, no, it was plane, you know, like they teach the people to pilot a plane, a small plane, you know, it was that kind of plane…, and I never saw that plane before. It's like something, I don't know, it's like they worked with the motors, I never saw a plane like that before!”- Credited to: Karim Arraki

4. “I was on my way to work…traffic was excellent…I received a call saying a small Cessna had hit the World trade Center…I was asked to go and man the Office of Emergency Management at the World Trade Center 7 on its 23d floor…” – Credited to: Barry Jennings

5. “I was waiting a table and I literally saw a, it seemed to be a small plane. I just heard a couple of noises, it looked like it like it ‘bounced’ off the building and then I heard a, I just saw a huge like ball of fire on top and then the smoke seemed to simmer down…it just seemed like a smaller plane, I don’t think it was anything commercial.”- Stuart Nurick, LIVE on CBS NEWS

6. “…We saw a plane flying low overhead which caught all of our attention. We looked up. It was making a b-line for the World Trade Centre. It was very low, extremely low, not a big plane like an airliner …uh… but not a tiny propeller plane, a small, small jet plane.”- Credited to: Mary Cozza

7. "I mean, I hate to admit this, but I'm sitting there hoping that someone has made a mistake; there has been an accident; that this isn't the hijacked airplane, because there is confusion. We were told it was a light commuter airplane." Credited to: (news report)

8. "I thought it could have been an accident...I thought the plane was much smaller..."- Credited to: Sid Bedingfield

9. "I was told by somebody that we had an eyewitness who happened to be an off-duty firefighter who told me that he saw the first building get hit and it was hit by a prop jet, which I think turned out to be the wrong information, but everybody sees things differently."- Credited to: Steven Mosiello

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 20:16:29 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43669 del
10. "And we went to a high point in our building, which is on the 25th floor, and you had a clear view of both World Trade Centers and the one that was smoking hard, and there was another plane that was flying low, and we just looked at it, and before we know it, it was just kamikaze, boom, right into the other tower... but it didn't seem like a big passenger jet. It was a smaller type plane, because it made some pretty radical turn, and flying low..." - Credited to: Mr. Tractsonburg

11. “We’re walking the dogs and we saw a plane flying really low, a jet, a small jet, and it flew directly into the World Trade Center..”- Credited to: (news report)

12. I got out of the car, and I told Larry I saw an FBI agent and I was going to start talking to him. I gave him my card, and he gave me a card. I said I thought that that second plane that went into the south tower was a military plane, like a transport or small cargo military. - Credited to: Battalion Chief Brian O’Flaherty

13. "Hey Grandpa, I'll tell you what woke me up. They bombed the World Trade Centre. I'm looking at it and Mi-Kyung's video taping it. Terrible. I heard, Grandpa, I saw it. It could have been a plane, but I think it was a bomb...a missile...er...this could be world war three."- Credited to: Mi Kyung Heller

14. “…I can only describe as, it sounded like a missile, not an airplane….it was definitely not the sound of a prop plane or anything like that….I grew up on military bases and I know the sound of jets and I’ve been in war zones and heard those kinds of different sounds….the sound itself was not of a prop plane , it was perhaps a jet, but it could have been a missile as well….it was high pitched, but it had a…er…a…whooshing sound, not, not like a prop plane…”- Don Dahler, LIVE on ABC TV

15. “It was a big fireball or something from the plane I guess, came from across the street in front of our rig, and as we get out of the rig, there's a cop, city police officer, in the street. He's telling us, "I'm getting out of here. I just saw a rocket." He said he saw it come off the Woolworth Building and hit the tower”. - Credited to: Peter Fallucca

16. “At that point I assumed you can't have two -- it can't be an accident to have two planes. So, I don't know if there's planes or missiles or what but something was hitting this thing. You saw debris was falling down.“ - Credited to: Brian Dixon

17. ”I was saying to him, "That plane is closer to us. It's really not a big plane going towards the building." Two seconds later it rammed into the building. "- Credited to: James Murphy

18. " Some people thought they saw a missile, now I don't know how they could differentiate, but we might leave open the possibility that this was a missile attack on these buildings ..." Dick Oliver, LIVE on FOX News

19. “I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fireball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions.” - Credited to: Patricia Ondrovic

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 20:22:17 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 43670 del
(61.70 KB 671x397 1412624247.jpg)
When planes actually hit buildings

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 20:47:26 Id: fac2b4 [Preview] No. 43674 del
>When planes actually hit buildings
Did you visit school? Simple physic explains the different impact of a Cessna vs. Boeing

Cessna 172 weight 1 ton speed 120 kn (max)
Boeing 757 weight 90 ton Speed 150 – 460 kn

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 21:17:33 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43678 del

since youre a physics expert why dont you explain how and 757 can exceed over 400 knots at an alltitude of 1000ft. Please. I'm very interested.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 21:22:21 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43679 del
(2.43 MB 640x480 432328943279.gif)

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 21:26:01 [Preview] No. 43680 del
>the indestructible passport
Theoretically the passport could have been blown out of the plane before it was consumed by fire, just very, very unlikely. On the other hand, some debris is to be expect to fall from and out of the plane. The question is, where could have been the passport in the plane to survive? I can not imagine a situation and place were realistically that passport was placed and did survive. I doubt anything out of the cockpit did survive undamaged.

My first idea after hearing they found the passport of the hijacker (2001) was “it has been placed”.

>which conveniently proves that the hijackers exist.
It proves nothing. Not even who were the hijackers.

My second idea was, “how odd they know who hijacked the planes even nobody survived to tell”.

Within hours they did name the hijacker, even when anybody on board could have taken control. They pretty quick “had good knowledge about anything happened”, even when they were utterly incompetent in preventing it. There were quite some “unfortunate circumstances” allowing the plan to succeed. The delay in warning and alerting the Air Defence, no fighter base in the near/closed base, fighter without arms, slow speed interception.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 21:35:17 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43682 del
(169.98 KB 960x960 4247328947823.jpg)
What happened to all the debris here jackass?

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 21:37:10 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43684 del
(154.91 KB 960x788 3193199301883.jpg)

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 22:26:04 [Preview] No. 43690 del
>since youre a physics expert why dont you explain how and 757 can exceed over 400 knots at an alltitude of 1000ft. Please. I'm very interested.

I didn't claim that. It is that the minimum speed of the heavy Boeing is higher than the maximum Speed of the light Cessna aircraft.

>Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB concludes 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively.
>Boeing sets maximum operating speeds for the 767 as 360 Knots and .86 Mach. The reason for two airspeed limitations is due to air density at lower vs. higher altitudes.
>Pilots For 9/11 Truth have calculated the Equivalent Airspeed for EA990 peak speed of .99 Mach at 22,000 feet as the equivalent dynamic effects of 425 knots at or near sea level.

That is really fast. I would have guessed half that speed, to give time for corrective maneuver. I initial found it odd how precise the planes maneuvered, considering that alleged inexperienced pilots were steering them. At that speed or even at reduced speed such a “small” target can easily be missed. Instead it was a nearly perfect hit. I think that can be explained by programming the auto pilot, so the plane might have done the flying. I'm no pilot of that Boeing models, so can not confirm if that would be possible since automated flight control does have limitations.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 22:33:13 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43691 del
ah thanks for proving youre a fuckin idiot. it has nothing to do with auto pilot. commercial airliners fly really high because if they traveled at 425 knots at 1000ft altitude, the plane would literally rip apart. this is regulated by the "flutter system". now tell me what happened to all the debris in shanksville fuckface

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 23:06:40 [Preview] No. 43698 del
>ah thanks for proving youre a fuckin idiot. it has nothing to do with auto pilot. commercial airliners fly really high because if they traveled at 425 knots at 1000ft altitude, the plane would literally rip apart. this is regulated by the "flutter system".

Ah is that so? You should inform the NTSB and Boeing about that. You see, I have only the videos showing the aircrafts maneuvering very smooth and precise, better than expected of inexperienced pilots.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 23:17:27 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43703 del
>the fake videos show something that's physically impossible
>therefore the videos are real and prove my point


now tell me about shanksville. where's the plane?

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 23:27:28 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43705 del
>>the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB concludes 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively.
>>Boeing sets maximum operating speeds for the 767 as 360 Knots and .86 Mach.

your own proof disproves what you're saying, how fucking stupid are you?

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 23:34:44 [Preview] No. 43707 del
>the fake videos show something that's physically impossible
To have positive knowledge of the aircraft maneuvering outside of the physically possible I would need additional information. I suspect you haven't enough information either.

>therefore the videos are real and prove my point
They look real and I have no information indicating them being forged. For me they create some questions not answered the last 15 years.

Anonymous 05/21/2017 (Sun) 23:47:36 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43708 del
>impact speeds were 510 knots and 430 knots respectively
>boeing sets maximum speed at 360 knots
>somehow this is proof the planes existed in your brain
>not knowing what flutter is
>the videos are real because it happened, it happened because the videos are real


Now, shanksville. Where's the plane. The truth is on your side, isnt it? This shouldnt be any trouble for you to argue.

Anonymous 05/22/2017 (Mon) 00:09:00 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43711 del
I love how the planes increased speeds as the altitude got lower and lower. Over 500 knots at moment of impact. This is not absurd at all, the planes must have existed BECAUSE IT HAPPENED GOY

Anonymous 05/22/2017 (Mon) 00:12:18 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43712 del
Thanks for the link to your proof.

Anonymous 05/22/2017 (Mon) 19:38:50 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43826 del
(258.05 KB 693x469 42424242345543.png)

Anonymous 05/22/2017 (Mon) 20:47:14 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 43838 del
(126.35 KB 1200x981 BST_BMAGG_J3395.jpg)
I'm an NYCfag and my father worked within sight of the WTC. He doesn't believe that any planes actually went into the buildings and that the footage is all probably CG. He's an engineer, and even at the time, it was unbelievable to many of the engineers in his office that planes alone could bring the towers down. He also recalls hearing/feeling explosions aside from the two impacts and the two collapses, and they may have come from underground. Take from that what you will, he also has some eye and skin problems that he has trouble pinpointing the cause of, because he's fairly healthy. Many of the people in lower Manhattan who had to walk home from their offices that morning ended up being covered in dust, they told those in his office (on an adjacent block to the wtc) to stay put, but he left with most of the people in the tower, and they all ended up getting covered in asbestos/ash from the collapse. He's partial to the theories that involve Tesla technology because of the huge amount and small size of the dust particles following the collapse. He's a eurofag, so at the time, his conspiracy theories weren't well received around the office despite their having witnessed a steel structure go down due to what the government claimed to be airplane impact alone (despite video and eyewitness evidence that suggested otherwise). He still works in the same office and people are much more receptive now, but usually it's just him and the ruskies he works with talking about the coming international communism, heh. He also shares his office with the NHK and talked to a few of them about Fukushima and that whole conspiracy, but they were tight-lipped .__. he also had a lot of fun messing with marxists during occupy wall street (I did, too), but that's a whole different anecdote.

I hate to post a "my dad works for nintendo" tier story, but it's kinda relevant, and even though I'm sure there are folks online who have conflicting accounts, maybe someone cares to hear it come from a faggot on /pol/ that someone who actually worked a stone's throw from ground zero didn't hear planes, but did hear explosions, and did get covered in a strange dust that has since caused him health problems. Take from that what you will, the whole thing made him pretty black pilled, so you can say he's jaded.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:06:41 Id: 64f4a7 [Preview] No. 43908 del
hey i just dumped a part of my picture set of 911 on cripplechan, and they asked me to create a thread here.
But i saw this thread so i let the archive here, h ttps://archive.is/kNenE. i've many others, if some anons are interested i'll create a new thread

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:11:55 Id: 132cb5 [Preview] No. 43909 del
Please make a new thread and dump them. Your images were fascinating.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:12:49 Id: 132cb5 [Preview] No. 43910 del
Please do. Dump them here. We're the 'higher intellect' anons that you see elsewhere. I'd love to see them here.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:26:58 Id: 64f4a7 [Preview] No. 43911 del
ok i'll do soon you have my words. i'll create a new thread in few hours... hoping i won't be banned/my thread deleted again :(

on a side note, do i risk anything legally speaking ? on halfchan my pictures have been deleted for "violation of the US laws" yesterday... i don't understand why..

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:28:56 Id: 132cb5 [Preview] No. 43912 del
Never use halfchan without a VPN. In fact never use any site for that matter. I saw you say mobile on 8pol. There's hundreds of VPNs for Android. Also there are apps to disable your mic and camera if your overtly paranoid. Check the play Store :^)

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 10:34:35 Id: 8d704e [Preview] No. 43913 del
>6mm aircraft aluminium cutting thru 360mm of structural steel

seems legit. Tell me, if 6mm of minyum can cut 360mm of steel, could 2mm of paper do it? 0.1mm of butter? What fucking alternative physics universe do you live in?

The documentaries on no planes are packed full of expert testimony, and are as convincing as any other 9/11 expose.
Stop playing League of Legends and watch a few docs like you used to b4 league came out.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:13:09 Id: d7609d [Preview] No. 43916 del
Some of your pics are in that NYPD archive and the photos were taken by a kike but they're worth of reviewing nonetheless.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:25:57 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43917 del
(835.69 KB 1004x543 1231322313131.png)

nice fake pictures

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:28:46 [Preview] No. 43918 del
>I'm gonna have to say the no planes stuff is disinfo used to discredit other, actually valid critiques of the official 9/11 narrative.

>6mm aircraft aluminium cutting thru 360mm of structural steel
>seems legit. Tell me, if 6mm of minyum can cut 360mm of steel,

Oh, the desinfo retard again.

How do you think soft copper can cut through steel?
What do you think is heavier, 90 tons of steel or 90 tons of feathers?
Sorry to disappoint you, but the Twin Towers were mostly air and had no 360mm steel armor.
The plane had engines and transport gear made of titanium. The front wheel assembly out of titanium at several hundred knots can easily punch holes into the facade of a high rise

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:35:48 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43919 del
hey fuckhead, you still havent explained how a 767 can travel 500 knots at 1000 feet altitude. you also havent exlained how there is absolutely no evidence of a plane crash in shanksville. You gonna run away like a little bitch again?

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:39:50 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43921 del
About 90% of the alleged authors of these “amateur videos” are people linked to the newsmedia and the film/video industry. A mere coincidence? Not likely. A more rational hypothesis is that they were chosen as credible scapegoats should any of those forgeries be publicly exposed - since all could be plausibly suspected of faking pictures for personal fame and gain. So why don’t we have a single authentic video of the crucial 9/11 events? Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones to jam the enemy’s electronics) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. In fact, several electronic disruptions occured in NYC on the day. See: Visual Control of 9/11.

ALLEGED AUTHORS OF 9/11 “AMATEUR” SHOTS (on public record):

computer graphics animator. Clients: Comedy Central, MTV, TCM and HBO.

On 9/11, worked for KSK VIDEO STUDIOS, New York City: “Creative programming solutions for television, interactive and multimedia.” Photographer with world renowned Magnum agency.

3D visual arts expert. Inventor of “Panoscope360”, a sophisticated 3-D installation which simulates “alternative life experiences”.

ABC TV video technician. 3-D motion expert and software designer. Clients: ABC and US NAVY.

Events manager at Scharff Weisberg, Inc., a NYC-based video production company, whose slogan reads: “Whether you're looking to dazzle the ears, mind or eyes, we've got the latest equipment and the expertise to make it work for you.”

Director/founder with “SPELLBOUND” pictures. Independent television producer.

Emmy award-winning filmmakers. Caught 1st and 2nd ‘airplanes’ and 'WTC7 ‘collapse’ on film.

Multimedia journalist at New York Times. Specializes in ‘desktop virtual news.’ Embedded with US military in war zones.

Pulitzer Prize winning photo-journalist whose work has appeared in The New York Times, Time, Newsweek.

Worked for 9 years as ‘photo retoucher’ (in her own words) for the Associated Press. Award winning 9/11 photographer.

Swedish photojournalist in New York City. Works for Norwegian populistic tabloid VG.

National Geographic photographer based in New York City. Works with the world's leading magazines including Time, Sports Illustrated, French Geo, Vanity Fair, Stern, Der Spiegel.

BFA degree in sculpture and photography from the Hartford Art School at the University of Hartford.

Founder of ADAIR film & Video productions. Consultant in digital media and visual effects.

Professional award-winning photographer.

Professional photographer.

Photojournalist for New York Daily News. Took picture of South Tower exploding right underneath it. No plane is seen in picture. He says he did not see any plane.

h ttps://septemberclues.info/faq_2.shtml

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:46:35 Id: 8d704e [Preview] No. 43923 del
hi shilltard

>How do you think soft copper can cut through steel?
>What do you think is heavier, 90 tons of steel or 90 tons of feathers?

Asking retarded questions. Shove them up your ass

>the Twin Towers were mostly air and had no 360mm steel armor.

A 10 mile diameter dome structure with 1 mile thick titanium kevlar armor is mostly air too, therefore by your fukwit logic a feather could penetrate the structure.

> 360mm steel armor.
It had 360mm steel exterior support columns, not armor per se, they are the part of the WTC that the planes with their 6mm thick aluminium hull would have hit 1st.

> The plane had engines and transport gear made of titanium

The holes in the side of the WTCs had the silhouette of the wings up to the tips.

>The front wheel assembly out of titanium at several hundred knots can easily punch holes into the facade of a high rise

Complete horseshit. You need high velocity armor pen firepower to penetrate 360mm of steel, at least a km a second. Not 500km an hour of wheels.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 12:48:43 Id: 64f4a7 [Preview] No. 43924 del
(2.82 MB 712x480 witness plane.webm)
actually i think the OC is legit but the plane have been added after in the pic.
don't get me wrong i totally agree with your analysis about the no plane factor. I even think i know which contractor built the remote controlled missiles : System Planning Corp under Dov S. Zakheim ruling.

a more complete webm version of your post

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 13:48:11 Id: 316f25 [Preview] No. 43931 del
> The plane had engines and transport gear made of titanium
>The holes in the side of the WTCs had the silhouette of the wings up to the tips.

The facade was damaged similar to the silhouette of a plane. Nobody sane claimed that the plane was entering the building in one piece. Basically the plane was smashed on the facade into thousand pieces, pieces who continued to travel into the building through the gaps and holes punched by the dense and solid parts of the plane, which are many. Simply because a part is ripped into pieces, the pieces don't loose momentum or the amount of momentum, energy the piece loose, that amount of energy is used to destroy the structure it is smashed against. Yeah some energy is also lost due to radiation, just in case.
The steel structure of the building is like a grating, plenty of space inbetween the steel parts. The “holes” in the structure are covered and filed with light material, for insulation and to keep wind and water outside. Large areas of that “filling” are just windows, more stable than the windows in most peoples homes, but not stable enough to withstand the impact of 90 tons of aluminium and titanium at several hundred knots. Don't believe the leading edges of the wings are soft like household aluminium foil. The fuel of the planes will keep its momentum as well and splash into the building.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 14:14:12 Id: 8d704e [Preview] No. 43934 del
>The facade was damaged similar to the silhouette of a plane.

Correct, but a redundant statement

>Nobody sane claimed that the plane was entering the building in one piece

Correct, because there was no plane(s)

>Basically the plane was smashed on the facade into thousand pieces

The fake video portrays a plane punching thru the steel facade without deceleration or rebound. It didn't smash 'on' the facade.

>pieces who continued to travel into the building through the gaps and holes punched by the dense and solid parts of the plane, which are many.

There's no part of a plane traveling at subsonic speed that can punch thru 360mm structural steel. Even the steel + titanium engines couldn't because they are not travelling fast enough.
Planes are so fragile they will disintegrate on hitting trees or wooden lamp posts.

>Simply because a part is ripped into pieces, the pieces don't loose momentum or the amount of momentum, energy the piece loose, that amount of energy

ok thats enough. U need to grow up, watch some more expert testimonies on the planes, and learn some more physics. And drop your bulshite, u are as bad as a leftshit or religious minion, 95% humans are genetically programmed to just mindlessly follow their religion or belief. If you are not careful that'll be your fate.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 15:43:23 [Preview] No. 43946 del
(464.84 KB 2048x1366 serveimage.jpg)
>The fake video

Yeah, it is “fake” because you say so, but can not show how it is a forgery, nor that it shows a physical impossibility.

>There's no part of a plane traveling at subsonic speed that can punch thru 360mm structural steel.

Would be nice if you could show as the mathematical proof that no part the plane could destroy strucural parts of the building.

>Planes are so fragile they will disintegrate on hitting trees or wooden lamp posts.

Planes can mow down whole forests, even at low, stall speed, lamp post are piece of cake.

As happened with Air France Flight 296 Airbus A320-111 crashed at Mulhouse–Habsheim Airport 1988.
w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=_v7LbxwZYF8

Do you notice how rows of thick trees are cut down by the wing close to the ground? It is on the video and attached image.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 16:05:04 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43947 del
>Would be nice if you could show as the mathematical proof that no part the plane could destroy strucural parts of the building.

would be nice for you to show mathematical proof how a 767 can travel 500 knots at 1000 feet altitude.

>it happened on 9/11, therefore it's possible

oh shit, cant argue that impeccable logic

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 16:34:49 Id: 8d704e [Preview] No. 43948 del
>but can not show how it is a forgery

its a forgery because its physically impossible
If you are so fuktarded u can't move you mouse and click on a youtube vid whats the point in anyone try to talk to you on this board?

>Would be nice if you could show as the mathematical proof that no part the plane could destroy strucural parts of the building.

>implying you would read and understand pages of structural and ballistic maths


>Planes can mow down whole forests, even at low, stall speed, lamp post are piece of cake.

depends how big and strong the trees are. Sapplings yes, a mature tree, no.

>whole forests

you have mental problems

>lamp post are piece of cake

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=u4MOULvOxvI

You idiot.
If your brainwashing is so strong it physically blocks u from clicking on links that might be inconvenient to your point of view, there is not much point me debating you is there? That was my last wasted comment on you. You don't belong here, I suggest you join a church.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 18:43:12 [Preview] No. 43967 del
>If your brainwashing is so strong it physically blocks u from clicking on links that might be inconvenient to your point of view,

That is an crash test intentional destroying the plane, a very old plane. A modern Boeing or Airbus flies twice as fast and has double the weight of that 70 year old plane.

When the wings separate, they have contact with ground:
w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvg1bIy4wxg

In an early test with a WWII vintage DC-7 without ground contact, the wing clipped the telephone pole.
w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=TrIZd53Gl4E

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 18:49:26 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 43971 del

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 19:13:35 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 43974 del
(553.53 KB 610x588 14324242523.png)
(566.33 KB 595x594 243241312321.png)
(1.23 MB 969x578 3252134142142.png)
i love how you ignore inconvenient questions and just plow on like an idiot

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 19:32:42 Id: 38ea4d [Preview] No. 43976 del
h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 19:54:55 [Preview] No. 43978 del
(245.57 KB 869x685 millenniumhilton.jpg)
Milchan was also producer of the movie titled Brazil which is set into a dystopian future where the state is in war with the terrorists.

Milchan was business partner of Murdoch's Fox and co-owner of an Israeli TV station with an Israeli billionaire named Maiman and Ronald S. Lauder.

Trump said in his recent Holocaust speech that Lauder is great friend of him.

The following article states Peter Kalikow is a good friend of Lauder:
h ttps://web.archive.org/web/*/h ttps://w ww.nytimes.com/1992/04/02/nyregion/nachman-quits-as-new-york-post-editor.html
"… one of The Post's main targets was Ronald Lauder, one of Mr. Kalikow's best friends."

According to the following article Kalikow said he's a friend of Trump for decades:
h ttps://web.archive.org/web/20161002031840/h ttps://w ww.newsday.com/long-island/politics/spin-cycle/peter-kalikow-isn-t-shy-about-supporting-donald-trump-1.12107088
“I’ve been friends with him for over 40 years,” Kalikow said in an interview. “Wouldn’t that be cool if he became president?”

Kalikow was the developer of the Millenium Hilton Hotel next to the WTC complex (the architect was Eli Attia, an Israeli) which intentionally resembles the black monolith in the movie 2001.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 21:32:22 Id: a8151b [Preview] No. 44008 del

Good post. Also note that Peter Kalikow donated several hundred thousand dollars to Donald Trump's presidential campaign fund, Trump Victory.

Anonymous 05/23/2017 (Tue) 21:39:57 Id: a8151b [Preview] No. 44011 del
> He still works in the same office and people are much more receptive now, but usually it's just him and the ruskies he works with talking about the coming international communism, heh.

So your dad is some kind of spook intelligence contractor who works with Russian spook intelligence contractors.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 01:15:35 [Preview] No. 44196 del
And Lauder is the president of the World Jewish Congress and besides him a French Rothschild is the chairman.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 01:29:59 Id: 66d70e [Preview] No. 44197 del
>millennium hilton
>hilton children regarded as high society after 2001
the name alone is suspicion that its namesake corresponds to the adjacent buildings date of supposedly sporatic demolition. the name millenium and how the new millenium was the year 2000 that is not a coincidence. especially seeing that the millenium might have been their time-line to start the new world order.

you have to suspect that there where people having a party in that hotel knowing and watching the terrorist attack. if you could find a guest list of people who where booked in rooms facing the wtc then you might be looking at some suspects.

also notice that the wtc memorial is the inverted monolith. a big hole in the ground.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 01:32:41 Id: 66d70e [Preview] No. 44199 del
underground explosions is valid because they tried it before in the early 90s and also the memorial is a big hole in the ground.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 02:14:46 [Preview] No. 44200 del
This is fringe but there was an episode of the TV series Get Smart titled 'Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho' first aired in 1967 and the plot of the episode was that a skyscraper was being built by a company run by the villains who build skyscrapers and rigs them with explosives during construction and later blows them up. The building under construction was named The Odyssey Space Center, which is somewhat reminiscent of the title of the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. (Which has 2001 in it.) The construction of the WTC complex began in Aug 1966. The writers and the production company of the episode it looks like were all jews.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 03:18:33 [Preview] No. 44203 del
Its not though because when you have a show like get smart its kind of an inside joke telling the viewer to get smart. obviously if someone in the 60s predicted 9/11 through that episode they would not be callled smart so they think their criminal hold over the culture is intelligence over the common man not a strict hidden shadow government.

as for the underground explosion that makes a lot of sense. supposebly they use nuclear drilling to melt the rock to mass tunnel underground. however to connect 2 tunnels or to tunnel a specific area they use explosions and rock blast the tunnel into creation. what is interesting here is that the only way to get the explosives into the incrimental space under the wtc would be to have it placed in the construction or to have a labyrinth of tunnels under nyc that could facilitate the equivilent volume of the towers. so now when you look at the attack it clearly looks like an initial explosios at the places the planes supposebly hit. followed by what looks like the buildings falling into the earth. the memorial utilizes the hole created by such an explosion.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 03:29:44 [Preview] No. 44204 del
also the way the fucking towers are built in the OP picture. You can easily see how given the shape of the structure how an underground explosion would be used to make sure the buileding caves in like tower 7. it easily would fill up and you would not have the building fall like a lumberjacked tree it would sink into the cavity formed by rock blasting.

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 20:24:53 Id: d5d28f [Preview] No. 44242 del
I'm going to post this here, because they are banning people with to much on-topic information on CIAchan.
>> 9968359
>> 9968021
>> 9966078
>You need to watch this:
>w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=8cfjYUHF8UE (skip to 34:05)
His argumentation that abrasive force work in two directions, the short top end of the building pushing down should be reduced the same way as the lower part it is pushing against, is valid, but actually no problem with observed evidence as he wrote later in his paper on the physic of the collaps of the twin towers:
>Videos show that the upper section of each tower disintegrated within the first four seconds of collapse. After that point, not a single video shows the upper sections that purportedly descended all the way to the ground before being crushed.
w ww.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

I think the weak point of Professor Jones argument in this film is the singular sample base. His paper in the “Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009”, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” adds three other sample points.
Those samples were taken from different places in Manhattan, eliminating the problem of eventual precontamination.

Professor Jones exothermic “red chips”, are interesting in so far by their mere existence. One wonders what explanation, origin those material has, particularly interesting is the estimated total mass of that reactive compound, 0.1% of the sample mass, among thousands of tons of dust. So there could have been tons of that stuff after the collapse.

The properties of this material could allow the marriage of the controlled demolition theory with that of the observed damage due to the plane strike.
The weak point of the controlled demolition theory is, that there is no control in a situation were a large nearly 100 tons heavy plane crashes into a high-rise building. During a controlled demolition a lot of attention is laid on the exact placing and timing of demolition charges. All connecting cables and detonators have to be in perfect working order to have controlled demolition and not some catastrophe were the building falls somewhere it should not or don't fall but is unsafe to enter.
I think it is impossible to arrange a plane crash and keep the demolition charges under control.

Lower temperature ignition thermite material could have been placed beforehand without any detonation control, but maybe connected with thin layer of the same material. So in case of a fire that thermite material would ignite without external control and weaken the structure of the building until the collapse.
Against that theory are the same arguments as against demolition charge theory. It takes a lot of time to prepare. It might attract attention, but less then the demolition charges, because there would be no need to lay control lines and detonators, thermite could be camouflaged as “protective anti-rust coating, fire retardant, fire protection coating”. Against such preparations speaks the danger of accidently, premature ignition, be it an office fire or just someone working with tools on the structure.

The main argument against any prepping of the Twin Towers is why should one? What additional advantage would one gain? Wouldn't be two planes crashed into the nations highest buildings hundreds of death not be enough “propaganda value”, for any side?
WTC7 does really look like arson. There were several older buildings heavily damaged by debris from the towers that didn't burn out or collapsed, while at a modern building like WTC7 some little damage and small fires lead to the total collapse of the building structure. So if there was no criminal manipulation, the structures were criminal unsafe constructions.

BTW there is new explanation for the collapse of the Twin Towers but not of WTC7. Explosive reaction of molten aluminium with water:
w ww.sintef.no/en/latest-news/new-theory-explains-collapse-of-twin-towers/

Sounds good except

Anonymous 05/25/2017 (Thu) 20:27:17 Id: d5d28f [Preview] No. 44244 del
BTW there is new explanation for the collapse of the Twin Towers but not of WTC7. Explosive reaction of molten aluminium with water:
w ww.sintef.no/en/latest-news/new-theory-explains-collapse-of-twin-towers/

Sounds good except for the “little problem” how should a pool of molten aluminium become out of shredded plane parts strewn around three floors. What one can observe with plane crashes and fires that the aluminium/magnesium hull just burns away without liquid metal and hydrogen explosions.
And don't we forget at the crash floor there were at least two persons surviving the plane impact, waving from the impact hole. Would have been quite a special fire, very localized, melting the plane parts, but let people survive.

A last comment on the film:
>“...it was not the muslims”
In face of actual evidence and bragging that is ludicrous. Why is that people have problems to accept a multifaceted reality, jump from one “guilty” to the next. Why is that difficult to accept that probably Mohammedans and the (((Deep State))) form an alliance of convenience, were nobody is subordinated to the other? Maybe an “alliance” were one side doesn't fully know, or don't know at all what the other side is planing?

Anonymous 05/26/2017 (Fri) 04:04:58 Id: f3c188 [Preview] No. 44282 del
>In face of actual evidence and bragging that is ludicrous. Why is that people have problems to accept a multifaceted reality, jump from one “guilty” to the next. Why is that difficult to accept that probably Mohammedans and the (((Deep State))) form an alliance of convenience, were nobody is subordinated to the other? Maybe an “alliance” were one side doesn't fully know, or don't know at all what the other side is planing?

This. Apparently the average kosher conspiritard doesn't know the following information (even though it's all heavily documented, publicly known, and found on the NYT website among other sources:

1. Nearly all the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabians.

2. They were working for, or controlled by, the Saudi Arabian Royal Intelligence Director, R.I.D.

3. The R.I.D. has been engaged in a 40 year long relationship with the C.I.A. (funding and training Sunni Wahhabi terrorists throughout the Middle East and Central Asia).

4. Anything involving Saudi Arabia = C.I.A.

Anonymous 05/26/2017 (Fri) 04:18:58 Id: f3c188 [Preview] No. 44287 del

I need to add one more point:

5. Anything involved the Sunni Gulf Arab monarchies = C.I.A.

example: Al Jazeera, the Arabic language satellite television news network which is headquartered in one of the Sunni Gulf Arab nations

Anonymous 05/26/2017 (Fri) 04:19:34 Id: f3c188 [Preview] No. 44288 del
>2.Saudi Arabian Royal Intelligence Director,


Anonymous 05/26/2017 (Fri) 08:20:02 Id: 8d03c3 [Preview] No. 44301 del

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 02:30:29 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 45742 del
(60.89 KB 258x371 1365519249667.jpg)
It is by no means rare to meet a Russian scared of international communism and willing to discuss how it could be implemented.

That doesn't seem fringe, that just seems like another big FUCK YOU from the perpetrators.

Do they even have geopolitical power? What world are you living in? The Ottomans are gone buddy, the muslim threat is largely manufactured by the real global players.

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 02:56:35 Id: defc9d [Preview] No. 45749 del
The "no plane" 9/11 conspiracy material is a C.I.A./Mossad psychological operation.

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 02:57:29 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 45750 del
(92.03 KB 694x642 1378971449379.jpg)

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 02:58:47 Id: 85f644 [Preview] No. 45751 del
No planes, no towers at INFOWARS.COM

On a more serious note this is a really good thread OP. Kudos.

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 03:03:51 Id: defc9d [Preview] No. 45755 del

No, it's not a good thread. It's complete bullshit invented by intelligence agents and propagated by mentally ill people on youtube.

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 05:08:54 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 45771 del
(439.24 KB 1024x1024 1366945001715.gif)
Looking at all the content available, I'm inclined to believe you. Most of my qualms can be reconciled through other theories. Despite my anecdotal experience relayed here >>43838 , being that my father was in an office building, hearing any planes "whoosh" by would certainly require a lot more attention than the ensuing blast. False recall can also play a role if you're suggestible. Actually, two months and a day after 9/11, a lot of people seem to forget that there was another major plane crash in NYC. It fell in my neighborhood and boy, did everyone and their mother hear that plane speed by. This doesn't mean anything to anyone but me, but that kind of real experience plays a role in my skepticism and analysis and whatnot.

Yeah, I'm going to keep researching, but being that project bluebeam exists as does loads of exotic technology, I just wouldn't put anything past the kikes. Since it's so personal to me and since I know people who actually died just going to work because the government thought it'd be funny, well, you can understand why I'd gravitate toward the most deprave theories. Besides, everyone knows if you're actually trying to introduce someone to this subject, you just have to show them the actual collapse footage, especially of WTC7.

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 05:12:03 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 45772 del
(3.83 MB 640x480 WTC7collapse1.gif)
this would probably be a more relevant gif

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 10:16:02 Id: 1d255d [Preview] No. 45799 del
>Since it's so personal to me and since I know people who actually died just going to work because the government thought it'd be funny.

I wouldn't say "the government." I would say, "C.I.A. + R.I.D. + Mossad."

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 20:35:31 Id: 9ebf2f [Preview] No. 45868 del
Rare footage here

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 20:36:05 Id: 9ebf2f [Preview] No. 45869 del
More rare footage

Anonymous 06/07/2017 (Wed) 20:36:48 Id: 9ebf2f [Preview] No. 45870 del

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 19:14:51 [Preview] No. 45993 del
Planes have been able to become remotely controlled since the 80s. The technology is there. Anything with a computer can be hacked, Bill. What good goyim don't understand is that MOSSAD operatives are there to make it look pretty. With technology rampant now, CIA will insure your passage to remnant energy better than ever, goyim!

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 20:04:07 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 45999 del
(36.03 KB 576x384 wtc2_dustification.jpg)
(509.11 KB 1587x601 dust.png)
Folks, the conclusive answers are all detailed by Dr. Judy Wood. What a fucking legend... what a living, breathing, mortal representation of human righteousness. She risked her life to go down in history, take from her example people, this is how you change the world. Use your knowledge to tear down the artificially constructed memes.

I hate to look into this stuff because fuck me, but the bastards actually used Tesla's death ray on my hometown. I should be fucking grateful that my father's life was spared, with the only health effects being that of ph 10-11 dustified concrete and human remains instantly scarring everyone in lower Manhattan's lung and mucous membrane architecture. The witnesses on West Broadway were all VAPORIZED. Cars all spontaneously combusted, my father always pushed the Tesla meme because he couldn't comprehend freefall or collapse occurring in any fashion similar to that which occurred on 9/11.. welp, looks like the evidence has all been compiled! Plane or no plane, there weren't any explosives, it was a fucking death ray. The explosions heard were from the combustion of the oxygen tanks carried by those firemen. Look at all that dust... everyone in NYC remembers the dust. Everyone was coated in it. The dust had vaporized human remains in it. This was induced cannabilization guys, these "people" are THAT. FUCKING. SICK.

I literally can't believe that some of my friends' parents were vaporized by Tesla's death ray. I can't believe I fucking saw it happen live in person and just thought "oh the towers are 'falling'" What a horrifying world we live in, to think that those at the top are so excited to spend their eternal damnation in hellfire that they'd engineer a fucking mythologically-inspired esoteric tarot-humor ritual sacrifice psyop to constitute the basis for some new world gospel they plan on introducing so that everyone else is dragged down to hell with them... I guess I don't have to wonder anymore the terrifying psychological constructs that appear when you realize exotic technology is being used to terrorize you and bring about the end of the world faster than anyone can come up with a peaceful negotiation so that some of our souls are fucking saved before we're enslaved for the next few thousand years. Sigh.... Well, enjoy the links, this woman made me cry when I found her last night; a brave new world indeed.

h ttps://drjudywood.com/
h ttps://youtu.be/vadSaWyiozg
h ttps://wheredidthetowersgo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/FOREWORD-PREFACE_3q.pdf

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 20:37:40 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46002 del
lol the "I WAS THERE GOY" shill arrives...they always do.

all of judy woods research on the tower collapse are in fact based on cgi videos so her research is quite flawed.

im more inclined to believe a huge smoke screen was pumped around the towers and they were demolished using more conventional methods than a fucking space beam.

"my friends parents died"

you're a liar, the victims were faked, just like every other modern day hoax.

you're a high level 9/11 shill

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 20:47:41 Id: 2c3f9c [Preview] No. 46003 del
No, you stupid faggot. Millions of people live in New York City. I happen to be one of the many who were red pilled by the massive coverup in the decade following the collapse. Her research is not based on CGI videos, so your premise is false. Her research is based on evidence found at ground zero, and eyewitness accounts, along with video footage that you claim is CG with no evidence. Fat chance. She's a genius, and you're a shill.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 20:54:12 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46004 del
The planes are proven to be cgi yet you believe all videos of the tower collapse are not cgi based on what? Because it was broadcasted on CNN? ok then. flawed research. I only deal with the facts.

do you believe the victims are real too?

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:04:49 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46006 del
(432.23 KB 868x473 242342290434324243.png)
so called real photos 9/11 "victims"

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:07:10 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46007 del
(430.36 KB 633x555 13242342453423232.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:09:08 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46008 del
(259.98 KB 661x526 fakkkkke.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:09:54 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46009 del
(214.45 KB 717x396 morefake.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:10:52 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46010 del
(237.62 KB 704x413 anotherfake.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:11:57 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46011 del
are you telling me these photos are of real people? I could go all day doing this if you want. They're all obviously fake. Do the research.

Do you believe these aren't photoshops?

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:14:33 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46014 del
(351.07 KB 839x655 wino.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:15:42 Id: b2aa0c [Preview] No. 46015 del
I'm with you but let us not forget 2001 was a different time as per interwebs and social media.
Such an event happening now would immediately be called into scrutiny by autists

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:16:48 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46017 del
anyone believing the photos of the so called 9/11 victims arent photoshops are in fact retards.

Do the research.

Fake victims. Just like every other hoax.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:19:17 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46020 del
yup you are correct. the perps are much more sophisticated now and have learned from some of the mistakes they made on 9/11.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:24:33 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46021 del
(31.19 KB 602x778 415752.png)
You are sick. Ladies and gentlemen, this man is a shill of the worst variety- either schizophrenic, or psychopathic. People did die on that morning, many innocent fucking people died. My best friend grew up without a fucking father because of these sick fucking exotic technologies. You should either shut the fuck up and repent for having been a complicit party in the propagation of blatant lies, or repent for knowingly deceiving people at the expense of the souls of those who perished so our lunatic leaders could invade Babylon. The victims aren't fake. The planes could be fake, but this was lower fucking Manhattan not a closed set in the Hollywood Hills. You are demanding a worldview that involves the conspiracy of everyone fucking working at every random company in the world trade center and adjacent buildings on that morning. The normal conspiracy involves a small group of profiteers who own media corporations and the military-industrial complex and then their useful idiots who are blackmailed into submission. The latter is how reality works, the former is how paranoid schizophrenia works, or how shills work. You get to be a liar or you get to be stupid. At least if you accept that you're being stupid, you can use that awareness to expand your knowledge and get one step closer to salvation. Spitting on the graves of those who perished? That's bringing you one step closer to hell, buddy.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:26:55 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46022 del
you sound mad faggot

what are the names of the people you know who died?

You won't name them because you're a faggot shill liar and you know i will post the obvious fake photoshops.


Do it.


Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:32:48 Id: 7f8dc6 [Preview] No. 46023 del
>The planes are proven to be cgi yet you believe all videos of the tower collapse are not cgi based on what?

uh, by the fact that they were no longer there on september 12th?

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:33:39 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46024 del
Vincent Morello was who I was referring to. Many of the people who died were firefighters who went into the fucking towers to save people at the "site of impact." They were heroes. Of course the kike illuminati want you to spit on their graves. That's why I'm mad. I could give you a dozen names, maybe thirty. You won't care because you have autism or schizophrenia and it's sad that the modern world has led to this state of psychosis where it's hard to determine what's real. The deaths on 9/11, though? Very fucking real and very fucking easy to confirm. Find the widows and children, holy shit, they're everywhere. People are still dying from 9/11-related illnesses. I don't remember one person who wasn't retarded or disabled not going to a funeral mass or wake in the month after 9/11. Churches were so packed that the sermons were televised outside of them for the crowds on the streets.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:34:17 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46025 del

the towers collapsed you idiot, that's not what i'm saying.

they just didn't fall the way you were shown on tv.



Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:35:57 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 46026 del
(2.00 MB 1200x776 189.png)
(898.66 KB 2200x1130 high-res-of-bomb-site.jpg)
(64.38 KB 496x485 pict86_close-up.jpg)
(196.97 KB 1200x796 pict122.jpg)
The Boston Marathon bombing was in 2013. However, it was laughably staged. Try to skip past this guy's self-aggrandizing PR bullshit and onto the jews behind the narrative.

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/user/PlasmaBurns/videos

tl;didn't watch - Esta and Bob Epstein of The Abbey Group - members of the Anti Defamation League controlled the Boston Marathon bombing and it was merely a flashbang.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:40:09 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46027 del
(53.91 KB 207x241 itsreal.png)
>it's a real person goy


Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:41:43 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46028 del
(218.41 KB 378x276 32189317378.png)
let me guess, this is a real person too?

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:43:56 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46030 del

Go ahead. Give as many names as you can. I want to post the fake pictures.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:44:01 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46031 del
(54.60 KB 600x601 1361765601054.jpg)
Wow, you're actually evil. Enjoy burning in hell for all of eternity, scumbag.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:45:53 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46032 del
(832.35 KB 1185x474 official911victims.png)
I'm sure all these people are real


Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:47:02 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46033 del

You said you could name up to 30 people

Go ahead.

>muh youre evil maaaaaaaaan


30 people



Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:49:20 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 46034 del
hell isn't real. It's yet another narrative pushed to scare the goys into subverting for the jews. Seriously, not even biblically. The old term was Sheol, which meant "where the dead go". The Greeks translated that term into Hades. The English translated that into hell. They were influenced by Dante Alighieri's vivid imagination with L'Inferno. In the NT, hell was translated from Gehenna, which simply meant the fire pit outside of Jerusalem.
There is no hell
Sage for off topic.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:50:46 [Preview] No. 46035 del
people died in 9/11

especially the firefighters. That is one of the least contriversial parts of the conspiracy.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:52:39 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46036 del

wow case closed! let's go home now, nothing to see here guys.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:54:35 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46037 del
(808.47 KB 1280x720 6246262364.png)

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:55:22 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46038 del
(229.74 KB 717x398 lololololol.png)
Totally not fake guys

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 21:57:42 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46039 del

you said you know 30 people who died (lol)

you backin out faggot?

you made a claim, now prove it. it should be easy for you. you knew these people.

let me guess, im dishonoring their memory so you wont do it? lol

cmon, let's go


Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:05:12 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46040 del
(187.54 KB 500x421 1368415633783.gif)
>muh datamining

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:10:11 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46041 del
(224.01 KB 728x412 7747289429493.png)
like i said
i knew you would back out. because youre a liar and the victims are fake.

i dont think you know what that means lol


you wont though

i already know

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:14:19 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46042 del
(284.64 KB 672x402 1111111111111111.png)

what exactly am i datamining? lol what a shit excuse

you fail

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:19:38 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46044 del
(2.02 MB 533x300 1345176833451.gif)
I'm a witness to one of the biggest crimes in human history. You're a paid shill playing a Borat-type character to spread misinfo and discredit the people actually discussing logical lines of reasoning. Those buildings were turned to fucking DUST by Tesla's death ray (see >>45999).

"Jet fuel doesn't dustify steel beams" should be the fucking meme. In fact, I've just introduced a new virus to this world and perhaps it'll bring about your downfall. Tesla technology is discussed by everyone who is even partially into conspiracy theories, it's not like this is even close to as outrageous as the official narrative considering the amount of dust and the video fucking footage. But that's all CG, eh? Damn you folks are desperate. Prepare for the end.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:22:22 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46046 del

it happened

>they used fake victims just like every other modern day hoax


Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:32:13 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46048 del

"dustifying space beams" is a really good excuse as to why there are no photos of dead bodies...good one...you really got me there. Youve got it all figured out

oh but wait

I dont recall space beams occuring in shanksville and the pentagon

where are the pictures of the dead bodies there?

yup, youve got it figured out alright.

fake victims

do you believe a plane hit the pentagon?

please dont tell me you do, even the most kosher 9/11 conspiracy accepts no planes were used there.

so what happened to the people on the supposed plane?


fucking faggot

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:44:31 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46050 del
What about all the firefighters and first responders who claimed to pull out all those dead bodies at ground zero? Are they liars or are they honorable firefighters like you believe? I thought space beams vaporized the steel? But they didnt vaporize the bodies? Great fucking theory you have there lol

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 22:49:21 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46051 del
Give me 1 picture of a dead body from 9/11 from a verified source


Go ahead or is this datamining?

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:00:05 [Preview] No. 46053 del
cryptome has pictures of chunks of flesh on the ground.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:03:45 [Preview] No. 46054 del
Folks, the conclusive answers are all detailed by Dr. Judy Wood.
>turned to fucking DUST by Tesla's death ray
>dustifying space beams

This is probably an old joke but she seems more like Jewdy Wood to me. It's another the disinfo campaign.

A simple and pratical explanation is that the fucking buildings were fucking emptied to a large extent. A controlled demolition in a controlled environment. They were preparing this for a long time. So all of the internal stuff that just dustified, most of the supposed amount of that simply wasn't even there at the time of the demolition.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:12:46 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46057 del
nice, someone who's smart.
these arent rare photo

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:15:18 Id: 9ebf2f [Preview] No. 46058 del
explain the fire on the lower floors then or shill and I'll assume you're a 9/11 paid shill

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:19:07 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46060 del
i dont give a fuck. any "official photo" from that day is fucking suspect and not proof of anything. it's a fire, so fucking what.

if youre trying to prove something, than explain, dont dump photos with no explanation ya dumb fuck.

>photo with "plane"

alright, now i know youre just trying shit my thread up. go back to your shitty 8chan thread.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:22:10 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46062 del
what's your point, spamming old photos is not an argument ya dumb fuck but im sure that wont stop you

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:24:04 Id: 9ebf2f [Preview] No. 46064 del
I'm just dumping some of my collection fag

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:24:32 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46065 del

theyre actually not lol but i know youre just here to shit the thread up.

carry on ya dumb fuck

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:25:14 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46066 del
your collection is full of fake photos ya idiot. do more research.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:30:52 [Preview] No. 46068 del
Yes, fellow posters.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:34:05 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46069 del
(2.09 MB 135x180 dustspire.gif)
(23.73 KB 600x401 2431.jpg)
(30.45 KB 600x417 toastedcar.jpg)
Read the fucking book, she's a physicist who actually details the fucking technology used on 9/11, if you're too stupid to understand things that aren't youtube faggots feeding you disinfo, then perhaps you can stay stupid. I'm going to start pushing this because it's obviously the key to closing the mystery of 9/11 and the 1200 toasted cars, the spontaneous combustion of those on West Broadway, the fact that the underground mall wasn't destroyed, nor was the PATH station... the fact that the collapse of a building that size can't occur at the speed it is supposed to have (every fucking person with a brain knew on 9/11 that there had to be explosives because buildings don't implode like that). I mean... is your brain gone? I understand the military needs to hound these threads because they detail how we have legal restitution for the crimes they committed (at least, since it's becoming the case that one can prove health issues were related to this Hiroshima on Acid).

Pics related. This shit turned to dust. That is Tesla's patents in action and fuck me if it isn't terrifying to think psychopaths are covering for these satanists. Literally vaporized. No wonder they're pushing the CG meme, lol. This is conclusive. The amount of dust is just an added bonus.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:40:21 [Preview] No. 46070 del
the dust could be comnig from underground. It is consistant with the kind of dust you get when making underground tunnels.its like cement crushed rock dust.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:42:04 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46071 del

her research is based on cgi images but that wont stop you from being an idiot. good job.

Anonymous 06/08/2017 (Thu) 23:58:11 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46073 del
(37.01 KB 400x600 itsfuckingdust.jpg)
(736.00 KB 1024x672 underground.jpg)
(814.11 KB 1024x654 mall2.jpg)
(605.37 KB 1200x800 thatsthetowers.jpg)
Everything underground was intact. The two 100-story buildings should have devastated the footprint, and that could cause a lot of dust.... but no, the underground mall was fine. These are shots from it after 9/11, the Innovation sign on one storefront proves this is from the mall after 9/11, contrary to whatever this CGspook will claim. Nothing was pulverized. This is impossible because of the way the WTC was constructed. In fact, it was constructed on a dyke and the land to the west of it is all reclaimed landfill (battery park). There would have been a huge flood if the tower collapsed into its footprint. The tower was vaporized and turned to dust. There's no other explanation for them disappearing like they did, the sheer amount of ultra-fine particulate, and every other anomaly.

This will be remembered in the future for all the dust and dust-related problems New Yorkers have suffered because of this act of criminal psychopathy. I dunno that God exists, but if he does, then he's probably looking at what he created with utter disgust. This technology could provide free energy for the world, albeit not metered. That is such a threat to the psychopathic circumcision cult that they'll pay armies of BORATS to fuck with people and act retarded and shift discussion and just disrupt any investigation into criminal matters. In our constitution, the common people are allowed to form a grand jury y'know? This is of course illegal now because the constitution doesn't really mean much and military statute supercedes it. But still, our country was founded with failsafes. Those failsafes are gone. As a result, trusting the systems of governance is just going to leave you disenfranchised. Look at Trump. It was a psyop.

This is what the world looks like when you have medieval personality types living amongst those of a more contemporary level of consciousness. To us, the way they think would best be described as complete disintegration. Mood swings, emotional impulses, desire for vengeance, lust for blood, projection of childhood trauma onto children of a foreign peoples (ex. "haha dead syrian boy wow epic loss"). These people will exist so long as childhood abuse like circumcision (and they love vaccinations) go on. I think we're in a liminal period and in such a point in time, accurate dissemination of information will be key to bringing about a world in which disinformation and indulgence and the cult of man is pointed out for being the whore of babylon that it is... and then the emperor will be seen without his clothes... after which point, it may become clear that our destiny can be shaped only when we cause change in our world... the creative impulse.. right now, that creativity is monopolized by hollykike jews who want to shape the next thousand years through a multimedia experience akin to 9/11 wherein all humanity is given a problem-reaction-solution type dialectic and they end up enslaving themselves and their children by buying into it. Countermemes can be developed, but who knows what these niggers have planned.

>95 shekels later
I'm going to start calling people like you BORATs. There we go, a great meme to counter this type of retardation. It will be unleashed upon the world shortly :^)

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 00:08:41 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46075 del
hello jew

hey you came back


name one more victim that you knew

you wont though, because youre a liar

or i forgot, that would be "datamining"


what happened to the bodies faggot? you evaded that question. i thought the brave firemen that you love so much pulled bodies out of the rubble? why didnt they dustify? space beams "dustify" steel but not human flesh? you didnt think this through did you lol

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 00:34:41 [Preview] No. 46076 del
>everything underground was intact
Ok I thought they set dynimite in the construction to sink the buildings into the earth.If the ground under it was intact then that makes sense. Not sure about the tesla weapons because I never really learned about that but it makes sense.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 00:41:43 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46077 del
(147.31 KB 1280x720 243623443.jpg)
Dude, you are the biggest lolcow this board has ever seen. I know you have to embrace that role, so allow me to milk you further; and also to better inform those lurking. The bodies were vaporized by microwave beams of an intensity that the bonds between molecules entered their vibratory states and subsequently turned to ultrafine particulate matter of >0.0002mm or even less it fucking seems. That is insane, dustification is a word invented to describe this new technology and the fact that is can pulverize concrete using the force of elecromagnetic radiation. Here's the patent, Borat

h ttps://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220060208672%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20060208672&RS=DN/20060208672

There were more body parts found than intact bodies. Dr. Judy Wood is a fucking genius, I bet that name instills fear in the hearts of kikes everywhere. "Where did the Towers Go?" is going to be the twenty first century's Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. What the fuck is going to stop that from happening? If they keep dumbing down the population, that'll make those of an inquisitive mindset seek out alternative sources of information which have more authority.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 00:48:04 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46079 del
>oy vey don't check out what a university professor in mechanical engineering with expertise in structural mechanics and materials engineering science has to say about a new technology that could provide the world free energy. please accept that reality is fake and nothing is real join the cult of kek... no one died on 9/11... microwaves don't exist... trump is the god emperor...

I'm just going to leave this here a second time.

h ttps://drjudywood.com/wtc/key.html

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:08:44 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46083 del

>The bodies were vaporized by microwave beams.

oh really? is that so?

>291 dead bodies were recovered “intact” from Ground Zero.
h ttps://w ww.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/september-11-attacks/8722638/21-awful-truths-about-911.html

I'm assuming the source for this information are the beloved firefighters and first responders heroes that you love so much and totally arent lying. So which is it? Who's lying here.

291 intact bodies. doesn't sound like much of a vaporizer ya fuckin idiot. 291 bodies should not be there if the fucking building was vaporized. but of course the real reason there are no pictures of bodies is because the damn building were EMPTY and the media and government are bunch of lying jews. like yourself.

So please now explain how 291 intact bodies weren't vaporized.

lol her entire theory is based on the cgi image of the towers "dustifying". They didn't "dustify" because of space beams. They "dustified" because it's fucking cgi. how fucking stupid are you?

btw, did you really think people would believe that you know 30 people who died on 9/11. Do you really think that's a believable statement?

And yet you can only name one. What are you scared of?

Nice unprovable theory you have there with the space beams. Have people chasing theories involving technology that can NEVER BE PROVEN. I know your game jew.

Why dont you write god again with the capital G.

Where are the bodies at the pentagon? Was a space beam used there too faggot?

Do you believe a plane hit the pentagon?

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:14:55 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46085 del
(241.93 KB 721x402 53454423424234.png)
h ttps://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.shtml

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:15:46 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46086 del
(206.71 KB 731x402 98666654564565.png)
h ttps://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.shtml

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:16:51 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46087 del
(522.48 KB 707x619 thefatboys.png)
h ttps://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.shtml

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:20:39 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46088 del
(19.63 KB 360x267 chuck.jpg)
Some of the building wasn't vaporized, obviously. What you're saying doesn't even come close to disproving any of the arguments I've presented, so try again.

Also, yes, it is very believable for a New Yorker to know 30 people who died. Are you actually going to try that angle? Over 100 people were killed in my fucking neighborhood alone. Look up, by neighborhood, how many people died in the outer boroughs... the places where fire stations were sending men to save the people being sacrificed by kike psychopaths. Many of the workers below the site of impact escaped. I know four people who escaped from their jobs at Fuji bank, which was pretty fucking high up if I recall. Many of the people who died were firemen who went into the towers to save people at the site of impact who couldn't get down because access to the stairways was destroyed. Many working class neighborhoods in New Jersey, Staten Island, Queens, and Brooklyn sent engines and men to the towers. Those are who died. Many of those men were people I knew through my childhood friends. When you go to a school with a thousand people, guess what, you attend a few dozen fucking funerals out of respect. Vigils were attended in the tune of tens of thousands. You got to know the victims if you didn't already, because whole neighborhoods banded together to help the widows and orphans get back on their feet. This is reality. You are a schizophrenic. I only indulge you because it sparks my creativity and my posts will inform anons, especially considering I have anecdotal experience with this fucking shitshow. What do you have? Cluster A personality disorders? Get a grip.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:25:13 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46089 del

Name some more people that you knew existed. The number is up to over 100 holy shit lol

Go ahead

No one believes you

>space beams
Yup it happened
>fake victims like every other hoax

it does seem like you get paid per word. good work.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:26:58 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46090 del
I do it all for free, and that's incomprehensible to shekelsniffers like yourself.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:27:42 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46091 del
Tell me what hit the pentagon
Tell me what crashed in shanksville
What happened to the bodies there?
Or just ignore these inconvienient questions. Your choice faggot.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:35:27 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46092 del
What about them? I'm suggesting that this was a huge psyop. The plane could have been landed in a military base and every person shot or programmed into some illuminati sex slave. I don't fucking know because the crime scene wasn't really open for investigation and there's not much to comment on. People died though, whether they were Unit 431-style experimented on or just gassed, who fucking knows. It's not like arguing that no one died is in anyone's favor but the criminal elements of the military-industrial complex, which is why I'm annoyed that you keep shifting the goalposts and thinking I'm going to feed into your delusions. I'm just here to shoot the breeze and talk about the shitshow that is our world. My arguments are pretty solid, you're just like... well, pic related.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:39:15 Id: aa1ca3 [Preview] No. 46093 del
(7.94 MB 640x360 911.webm)

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:39:45 Id: aa1ca3 [Preview] No. 46094 del
(7.94 MB 640x360 911.webm)
Just posting the most necessary webm.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:40:00 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46095 del
>The plane could have been landed in a military base and every person shot or programmed into some illuminati sex slave.


ya that makes sense. or would it be much easier to just fake them? nope, let's go with your complicated shit.

>My arguments are pretty solid

ya, if youre writing a fucking sci fi novel. god damn you are stupid.

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:40:35 Id: aa1ca3 [Preview] No. 46096 del
Sorry for double post, browser glitching

Anonymous 06/09/2017 (Fri) 01:47:45 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46100 del

this shit is so outdated. do more research.

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 02:42:32 Id: 3e947b [Preview] No. 46568 del
im a newfaggot. I like this place. its comfy.

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 02:49:28 Id: 9af47b [Preview] No. 46569 del
(44.28 KB 527x352 4235452.jpg)
>a thread where a psychopathic shill with 90+ posts makes fun of dead 9/11 victims and claims the attacks didn't happen

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 02:56:56 Id: 3e947b [Preview] No. 46570 del
you faggots make me regret ever owning a phone or being the internet at times.

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 10:03:25 Id: c6a4af [Preview] No. 46615 del
Piss off with your androgenous chink retard


Shills come in many flavours, ones that totally agree, others that present partial truths or flat out deny. What is certain is that no matter their approach theyre useful for subversion. Be critical of all information you disseminate anons, there are many "wolves in sheeps clothing" around this board and especially on 8cunt pol

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 15:39:45 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46626 del
(228.45 KB 728x648 55555555555555555555.png)
>this is a real person goy

h ttps://septemberclues.info/vicsimripiculous.shtml

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 15:48:44 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46627 del
(228.31 KB 430x412 real911victim.png)
I encourage everyone to go through these memorials and then tell there are no photoshops in here. Do the research. It's quite hilarious how these shills try to deny this.

h ttp://w ww.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/memorial/

h ttp://w ww.cantorfamilies.com/cantor/jsp/index.jsp

h ttp://terror.septemberclues.info/New%20York%20og%20Washington%2011%20september%20menu.htm

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 18:07:45 Id: bc628f [Preview] No. 46630 del
(49.88 KB 461x407 775545.jpg)
>please deny the atrocities committed against you goyim
>nothing is real
>reality is magic

BORATs like you dominate conspiratorial research simply because it helps to discredit or otherwise divert discussion.

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 19:21:11 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46635 del
(165.17 KB 417x407 itwasrealinmymind.png)
>actually thinking this is a clever meme

let me guess

the holocaust and sandy hook victims are real to you too


Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 19:25:01 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46637 del
>psyops are not atrocities

try harder jew

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 20:58:47 Id: defc9d [Preview] No. 46644 del



>File Alex Jones Stupid 2.gif is banned from /pol/

Anonymous 06/11/2017 (Sun) 22:38:09 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46652 del
(225.43 KB 477x471 totallynotaphotoshop.png)
>incomprehensible non sequitur argument somehow relating this to alex jones even though alex jones gatekeeps 9/11 fakery
>crisis actors don't exist

good one

usually when ridiculing somebody it helps to make some semblance of sense, or you know, have a point

shill better next time

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 00:48:35 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46670 del
>shills now resorting to posting gay black porn

no planes/cgi/fake victims confirmed

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 04:13:57 Id: 0501ae [Preview] No. 46697 del




Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 04:14:21 Id: 0501ae [Preview] No. 46698 del

>File Alex Jones Stupid 3.gif is banned from /pol/

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 12:16:15 Id: d791c6 [Preview] No. 46783 del
(179.22 KB 392x385 5342534454325432.png)

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 18:09:01 Id: 224eda [Preview] No. 46803 del
Maybe it's because R9K is one and someone already posted it once on some active thread.

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 21:57:10 Id: f3a35c [Preview] No. 46808 del
I believe it was the first "mainstream" use of drones by a government entity on their citizens.

Anonymous 06/12/2017 (Mon) 23:09:09 Id: a8151b [Preview] No. 46811 del

No, it's a word filter that the previous BO put in place, and the new BO refuses to remove it because he's an Infotard.

Anonymous 06/13/2017 (Tue) 02:07:39 Id: e08198 [Preview] No. 46816 del
Isn't it just the opposite to remove trolls that do D&C tactics, and if that's the case, you're probably one of said trolls that want to make stupid posts about Jonestein in general.

Anonymous 06/13/2017 (Tue) 16:17:12 Id: 48efa2 [Preview] No. 46840 del

Fuck yourself, Infofaggot.

Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 09:49:23 Id: 335bc5 [Preview] No. 49146 del
this thread was about to slide off, and nobody gives a shit 'cept me.
Wonder how many decent thread our resident shill successfully slid due to our handrubbing hooknose mod only locking and not deleting slider threads.

Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 13:09:02 Id: 335bc5 [Preview] No. 49167 del
(320.67 KB 992x836 end_shill.png)

#sj7DAl 07/16/2017 (Sun) 13:19:20 Id: 425aa7 [Preview] No. 49168 del
why dont you mentioned this thread was bumped too? you are not honest with us.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 13:33:49 Id: 53cf28 [Preview] No. 49169 del

Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 13:40:02 Id: 335bc5 [Preview] No. 49172 del
>ignores the problem
>deflects onto another alleged problem
> if a poster focuses on a particular issue, accuse him of 'not being honest' because he's not telling all the truth about everything and anything related.

nice work shlomo

You haven't posted evidence or argument for or against the issue victims vs false victims. Some of the victim sites look shody, like only getting photographs for 50% of the victims, some of the photos are crap and B&W, which is absurd for year 2001. Also it would be useful to the kikes to set up and run shody victim memorial sites so as to group the victim family community, but then frustrate it and lead it nowhere. Just like endchan is doing with freethinkers.

#sj7DAl 07/16/2017 (Sun) 14:20:25 Id: 425aa7 [Preview] No. 49178 del
(16.03 KB 320x316 asfasfwf.jpg)
>You haven't posted evidence or argument for or against the issue victims vs false victims
maybe its because i have not posted in this thread?
wow you did a discovery!!! i have not posted in this thread.
congrats man, congrats. now after you passed the IQ test, you may should retry to finish elementary school...

>OH LOOK ANOTHER BU.. (>>49169)
>i mean, oh just ignore that. thats ehh ehhh thats not a bump because ehh ehhh... if this thread is bumped its not a bump ehh ehhh 1488 gas the kikes!

you forgot to post a picture of hitler to "prove" you are one of us
Fuck off, faggot.

Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 17:18:50 Id: 335bc5 [Preview] No. 49183 del
Oops. Didn't realise this fucking shill namefags. Ignore

Have some content.
3rd law of motion + Conservation of momentum applied to WTC collapse.

h ttps://w ww.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVHWiZu8NM

Anonymous 07/17/2017 (Mon) 15:35:39 Id: 729e39 [Preview] No. 49232 del
(856.78 KB 1078x2518 911confession.jpg)

Anonymous 07/17/2017 (Mon) 23:59:53 Id: 83c35e [Preview] No. 49244 del
>the twin towers may have been hit by planes, what is you argument they were not?

jesus christ, this guy is autistic. Stopped reading the thread when I got to that point. Is the FBI finally weaponizing autism?

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply