He's mentioned before he posts like that to provoke us. >there is about 20 results some of them really seem like this guytry searching for "corleone" >or he is a shill who slowley chips away at the community by doing a psyop against truthseeking
This is the effect his behavior can have, I am also unsure weather or not it's intentional(in the sense that he intends to harm the board)>even moreso in the neverending meta discussion and all that he has to say about things that are neither here nor there
This is probably my biggest qualm with the guy and why I even considered giving him a b& in the first place.>>34094
Not really what I was talking about when I said "currency and physical mediums"
I meant things like the move from paying in cash to paying electronically, the move from buying a DVD to having to download a movie or "stream" it and not really even own it at all(communism). >>34091
Intently as in you reply quickly, guess that is just your style though. >>34093>what we will see is slight fluctuation followed by trying to become louder and louder
I could see this happening and if I do it will be dealt with. >I think an actual thread along with the board owner basically telling him to taper it down in the nicest way possible
I think the no-meta outside stickies rule should be enforced it's effectively the only one we have, besides the unspoken "no spam/offtopic/dead dog faggotry"
should be the thread for discussion of GLPtard, as well as the other two shills OP brought up, they're probably the same guy.
And for the other bit, GLPtard, calm the hell down with your posting.
It's getting to the point where you're derailing threads and it sounds like it's fucking up discussion. I can definitely see how it would as you've been in this thread for a day and take up almost a quarter of the posts many of which are in rapid succession and unrelated to eachother. For instance you tried to reply to me and didn't quote my post, then later on continued your post after another user had already replied without referencing the post you're replying to. It looks incoherent and spammy to someone who hasn't read the whole thread. >genuine confusion as to whether to censor this man
I don't necessarily think bans are censorship and his content isn't spam-like enough
to warrant deletion yet. I don't like deleting content unless it's either illegal, off topic, or a blatant spammer/provocateur/shill. Bans expire, ban-evasion can occur and he could take it as a lesson and assimilate when he comes back, he could flip out and spam and get a longer ban now that he warrants censorship. >At least try. If you try then you will notice how immature to iumage boards this seems.
This is the best suggestion you could give him. Do this GLPtard. >>34100
Not really a "callout" since there is rightful suspicion. >Who in the world does not want to see me do more of my stunning epic shit, I mean come on dude,
I'm unsure if this is epin irony shitposting.