>>34781 >Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency...
But of course there's a but, all socialism has double think, all of it.
>at the same time holding that his interests as an individual consonance with those of the community.
Yeah, nah, more bullshit of the seizing of the sources of production, monopolizing them via nepotism to a select few, then proceed to call it "freedom" but with the interests of the community. In a Natsoc. society there was no such thing as individual liberty, you were told what to study, what to do and if it goes against the grain you were either drafted to war, or put on a labor camp. Even podunk farming communities got their shit fucked and their assets seized for the state's use.
>muh it was a state of crisis and war
Right, there was SO MUCH WAR DURING PEACE TIME, yup. Oh wait there wasn't, but Hitler was doing his best at aggravating the Polacks. It doesn't help that the Polacks had to put up with Germans nigging around, and so when the "poor innocent "ethnic" Germans" were kicked out of Poland for nigging, Hitler decided to join Stalin in the raping. Because really, the German "massacres" in Germany were not really massacres but deportations.
But hey, don't let me get in the way of your narrative of Hitler being a perfect princess who dindu nuffin!