03/15/2017 (Wed) 03:39:32
McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. The term refers to U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy and has its origins in the period in the United States known as the Second Red Scare, lasting roughly from 1947 to 1956 and characterized by heightened political repression as well as a campaign spreading fear of influence on American institutions and of espionage by Soviet agents.
In other words, McCarthyism is a form of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) which the reason why I've mentioned McCarthyism specifically is because previously the mainstream media claimed Flynn was connected to Russia which was why he was kicked out but the thing is, that was a non-issue that was treated to be a part of the Russia rigged the election theory which McCarthyism focuses on Communism as an excuse.
The Guardian is generally unreliable, statistically high probability of lying to your face (which Wikileaks explained what was already known by most people), and it takes much more than one article to prove anything. All news requires interpretation from someone who actually knows what's really going on because all news is potentially, CIA controlled, legally faked news. The argument here is how you plebs consider any and all news sites are treated like gold when all news needs to have some methodeutic to confirm the claims made.>>34311
Are you implying that he's a Jew or a Shabbos Goy or a Potatonigger (pick one)?
All news, ALL NEWS, they're terrible and require interpretation. The problem is, the interpreted news in independent news media sources tends to be of generally higher purity but still, not entirely good. Don't take anything at face value. That isn't to say that there isn't some news that seems legit based on how it's written, but most, if not, almost always, there's nothing newsworthy on the news. Your unsubstantiated claims of the CIA controlling this and that is based on inactive ties. The CIA, NSA, FBI, they are not working for the Trump Administration which to utterly ignore the real reality of the situation proves you are in some level of denial, which is how you can trust The Guardian more than independent media. There's kikes in both sides, but kikes prefer mainstream media to deceive people more than through independent media, that's just basic logic. Alex Jones is or was going through issues with his Jewish wife that is really a kike agent that sought to take him down through divorce at the height of his career. No matter how terrible Alex Jones is (and at least 50% of his viewers), even he's an enemy to the Juden. Most thinking people only watch his interviews with other people. There are non-White Nationalist, non-"popular" independent media sources out there, so saying that The Guardian is better than Alex Jones and Breitbart is irrelevent and also false.