/operate/ - Endchan Operations

Let us know what's up

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096


(154.22 KB 1483x461 fasfgasg.png)
ENDCHAN OWNERS STOP SUPPORTING CENSORSHIP #sj7DAl 11/02/2017 (Thu) 21:11:40 [Preview] No. 7437 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
it cant be more blatant than this. "adolf hilter" just used the chance to delete an old thread with evidence about (((ocolette))).
he is blatantly erasing board history.
"adolf hitler" used the simple tactic to mix the deleted thread under the spam and called it "D&C"

there was enough room in the catalog of /pol/ and the only purpose of thread removal was to censor it again in a sneaky way.

odili why do you refuse to admit that the current /pol/ moderation need to be eliminated?


btw this thread contains "adolf hitler" admitting to work with black people etc. i do have a an archive on of the thread stored on my pc


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 23:54:46 [Preview] No. 7446 del
(55.29 KB 900x900 photo (2).jpg)
>>7437
Ocelotte isn't our BO anymore. The thread was irrelevant, ancient, no-one cares but you, and he actually did ban the anti-Irish spammer on multiple occasions.

==But it's precious how hard you keep trying.



(29.68 KB 547x603 pepe janitor.png)
Anonymous 10/12/2017 (Thu) 13:25:28 [Preview] No. 7215 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>see CP
>click post box to select it
>scroll down
>click global
>put in captcha
>click report
<TOR users are blocked

Can you fix that?
Oh and the CP spammer has evolved his tactics, he's much more subtle right now.
12 posts and 1 image omitted.


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 11:50:11 [Preview] No. 7396 del
(125.83 KB 513x465 tor blocked.png)
this is the message when you try to report as tor


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 12:10:35 [Preview] No. 7399 del
>>7391
Just get more mods then, you can't run it by yourself.


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 19:27:40 [Preview] No. 7412 del
just autoban and delete anything with ARTBBS in it


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 19:46:12 [Preview] No. 7413 del
>>7412
That doesn't work, I tried using text filtering.
He just stopped writing stuff and began to put his link on the image.

The only thing that ended up working was performing OCR on the file and checking for text there.

He almost got trough that, though, but he gave up before.


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 09:06:04 [Preview] No. 7422 del
>>7413
He does it manually anyway.



(2.42 MB 1489x1600 026.jpg)
Anonymous 10/30/2017 (Mon) 03:38:49 [Preview] No. 7361 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Daily reminder to post at >>>/endpol/
5 posts and 7 images omitted.


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 14:27:27 [Preview] No. 7405 del
(223.96 KB 1536x1819 _20171101_102618.JPG)
The great moderation at /pol/ btw


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 14:57:01 [Preview] No. 7407 del
(162.42 KB 1382x442 Me.png)
>>7404
>Jew Jew Jew
If you say something a million times, that makes it true? Fuck off. I've already explained what must be deleted, and I screencap everything that gets deleted from now on. /endpol/'s doonoo shill with his Pepe anti Adolf Hitler shit joins RPD who works for Jim and the Barry ((Goldwater)).
>>7405
Yeah, you're the fuckers trying to skew the narrative and prevent g_c and me from actually moderating shitposts, CP and spam. RPD's butthurt he's no longer Vol for his Trump templates everywhere. Trumpfags then came in to cry in the Meta and I told them to take it to the containment, made because of Jim's slave RPD. You won't get end/pol/ no matter how hard you try. You have the nigger spammer on your side now. Hilarious. He's even attacking Odilitime with his crazy shit.
>>7384
You shills stand no chance in hell. You're all too mental to make any sort of successful coordinated effort to take /pol/ down.


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 15:45:04 [Preview] No. 7408 del
>>7407
>forced Pepe narrative
No one talked about Pepe besides you. You obviously do the same thing you talk about if you say "saying it a lot must make it true" but you're so retarded you can't see the error in your ways


Anonymous 11/01/2017 (Wed) 18:50:43 [Preview] No. 7410 del
>>7402
Wow it's the same modus operandi as 8ch! What a coincidence!


Anonymous 11/02/2017 (Thu) 18:01:46 [Preview] No. 7434 del
(112.21 KB 856x330 shill.jpg)
>>7408
>No one talked about Pepe besides you.
>>7397
Riiiiiiiiight.



(28.19 KB 300x229 i2p-300x229.png)
Anonymous 10/14/2017 (Sat) 02:55:35 [Preview] No. 7230 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
endchan.i2p is down


Anonymous 10/29/2017 (Sun) 21:55:17 [Preview] No. 7360 del
i2pd user here, can confirm. What's your b32 or b64?



Anonymous 10/28/2017 (Sat) 01:05:25 [Preview] No. 7321 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Why do the mods keep removing images which are not against board rules or the global rules?
9 posts and 2 images omitted.


Anonymous 10/28/2017 (Sat) 19:00:22 [Preview] No. 7333 del
Holy shit, we're not even sure if a mod deleted a "legal" picture and people are already mad.
Could you at least point to what was deleted in the logs? Assuming it's legal you should be able to post it and get an official response here if it really is illegal. If it was deleted by a non-global mod, don't post about it here as this has little to do with /operate/. If it wasn't even deleted by a mod we could have a bug that needs addressing. You should have made a more explicit complaint that wouldn't lead to people wildly speculating.


Anonymous 10/28/2017 (Sat) 19:17:17 [Preview] No. 7334 del
I think there are two separate issues being discussed in this thread. They might be related, but they might not be. The first is OP's thing. The second issue is that pictures are being wiped/lost from threads on several boards over the last couple days. I'm not a mod and have no access to any logs that I'm aware of, but it's not hard to find threads being affected. /sp/res/139057.html is one. The text posts remain, the images are gone.


Anonymous 10/28/2017 (Sat) 19:56:52 [Preview] No. 7335 del
(256.59 KB 1200x1600 1505258662758-0.jpg)
>>7333
>Holy shit, we're not even sure if a mod deleted a "legal" picture
There's no need for the scare quotes. The images to which I'm referring are unquestionably legal in the United States and probably everywhere else in the world. Though on endchan, it's U.S. law that matters.

>and people are already mad.
Nobody's mad. I asked a simple question, civilly. Please calm down and reread the OP.

>Could you at least point to what was deleted in the logs?
No, because it's not in the logs. But picrel is one of the deleted images.

>Assuming it's legal you should be able to post it and get an official response here if it really is illegal.
None of the endchan mods are, to my knowledge, lawyers or judges. I'm not looking for a legal opinion, and don't need one. Again, the images to which I'm referring are unquestionably legal. I would like to know why they've disappeared.


Anonymous 10/29/2017 (Sun) 02:49:47 [Preview] No. 7340 del
>>7335
>nobody's mad
I'm calm, but some people replying aren't completely calm. Wasn't necessarily directed at you, so I don't see why your implying I'm upset.

>picrel
Was it on /b/? I've seen it before. If the post is still up could you link to it? If not maybe the logs will show us who deleted it.
It's true that I don't see "deleted pics" in logs. If that's not a feature it should be added to the logs for transparency, so I'd ask for that if I were you.


Anonymous 10/29/2017 (Sun) 03:11:08 [Preview] No. 7343 del
Dunno whether all the pics disappearing is a bug deleting media, a bug being exploited by someone to delete media, or someone using board features to delete media and it doesn't really matter which it is. It's occurring at a high enough rate on enough boards to all types of media that I'd think it'd be a concern for an image board. I'd be monitoring a big list of images and running tcpdump on inbound to try to get a correlation and id the cause if it were my system but whaddevah. Mebbe someone's way farther on it than that.



Anonymous 10/07/2017 (Sat) 14:57:38 [Preview] No. 7171 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
what happened to endchan.xyz? on twitter it said "shut down due to abuse", what does that mean?
29 posts and 9 images omitted.


Anonymous 10/13/2017 (Fri) 07:55:58 [Preview] No. 7224 del
>>7222
>you're not fooling anyone faggot.
>faggot
>but wants to make an accusation of attraction to adolescent females
You poor, confused cunt. You're just lashing out without thinking. As usual.

Tell anon, buddy. Why are you so worked up about this? Where did your uncle touch you? Was it in your peepee place? Or your bumbum? Poor guy. It wasn't your fault. Now calm down.

>Honestly if this site continues to tolerate your obvious hebe shit then y'all look suspect.
If you seriously have a problem with legal photographs that aren't even in the ballpark of being DOST concerns being posted, you don't even need to go back to 8chan. You need to go waaaaaaay back to 4chan and fellate Hiroshima Nagasaki's 3 inch Nip wang in gratitude for the hugbox he has created that doesn't even acknowledge the existence of human females under the age of 18. How cucked can you get, buddy? Sad!


Anonymous 10/13/2017 (Fri) 20:24:48 [Preview] No. 7228 del
>>7206
Here's some sufficient evidence:
>>>/AM/22656
Same file naming tactic as the nigger spammer, and I'm sure I read you saying once that you were familiar with him from observing /pol/. Globally reported first. That's why the report will say, "SHOW THIS TO BALROG".


Anonymous 10/13/2017 (Fri) 22:50:10 [Preview] No. 7229 del
>>7228
I'm not familiar with the nigger spammer, but that kind of spam has been around for a while though on many sites.
It could just be a switch to a different tactic though. Or it's a coincidence.
>>7206
I don't think it's FUD. It just stays up on /draw/ much longer, maybe because it's a spammed board that gets less traffic compared to others.


Anonymous 10/21/2017 (Sat) 21:36:56 [Preview] No. 7256 del
>>7224
you're such a pathetic faggot. everyone knows why you post pictures of 10 year old girls, it's a pedo dogwhistle and I've seen you and your friend do it on imageboards for years. I already explained it, I know you saw it so the only reason I'm responded is so the other motherfuckers here can pull their heads out of their goddamned ass and ban your fucking sick ass. My conversation with you is done. Quit acting fucking stupid mods and board owners and tolerating this shit, like you dont know what this motherfucker's MO is. Its a goddamned disgrace and you oughta fucking quit being tolerant of it.


Anonymous 10/23/2017 (Mon) 01:04:30 [Preview] No. 7260 del
>>7256
>I already explained it,
And I already pointed out why everything you wrote is laughable and wrong. This most recent hyperventilation of yours is just a repetition of your ridiculous whining. I'm only responding because, holy shit, you really did suck dick every night growing up, didn't you? I was just kidding about that, but there's no way you'd be this triggered if you weren't your uncle's or stepdad's fucktoy growing up. Shit sux, man, but you can't have a mental breakdown like this every time you see a child. See a therapist. I wish you luck on the road back to mental health.



(586.18 KB 986x1957 cleaned by glovol.png)
(1.39 MB 562x362 get a life.webm)
Glovols and /AM/ Anonymous 07/17/2017 (Mon) 08:22:07 [Preview] No. 6786 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>>>/AM/21669

Can you pedos stop interfering with /AM/?

First you leave CP on the front page for DAYS and somebody has to make a thread on /operate/ (!) to ask you delete front page CP. Odili himself has to delete it because glovols are busy jerking it to underage girls.

Then you delete OC from /AM/ because "it looked like CP to me". Of course you would know since you volunteer to look at CP for free so you can determine whether you need to "delete" it.

Now you talk down to the /AM/ BO as if it's his first day. Not only that but you pedos are illiterate as well.
>delete for rule 3
Let me copy paste rule 3 for you:
3. No flooding/spamming for the purpose of advertisement.
Let me explain it for you pedovols:
3. No spam if the spam is meant to advertise.
So you now delete an entire catalog for no reason at all.
And then you talk as if the BO doesn't know how to moderate.
Get a life stupid pedos.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



Anonymous 10/21/2017 (Sat) 20:31:24 [Preview] No. 7255 del
Daily reminder that pedos are the aids killing the internet


Anonymous 10/23/2017 (Mon) 00:45:02 [Preview] No. 7259 del
>>7255
>Daily reminder that pedos are the protease inhibitors saving the internet
ftfy



(244.82 KB 728x409 scanner_darkly.jpg)
Administrator requested on /tech/ Anonymous 09/30/2017 (Sat) 23:13:38 [Preview] No. 7122 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Hey odili, can you give a position to us on this thread? >>>/tech/11420

I think there's some people trying to subvert the high quality posts on /tech/. The basic questions I do is:
1- Who rules this board?
2- What kind of posts should be allowed?
3- What direction this board should go:
A: quality posts
B: desktop threads
C: other

Your answer there will be appreciated. Thanks.
25 posts and 8 images omitted.


Anonymous 10/02/2017 (Mon) 06:28:03 [Preview] No. 7158 del
>>7154
>I can't reject what doesn't exist. You people ain't trying to refute my arguments, you're trying to refure me.
For the most part, it would be a waste of time to "refute" what you are referring to as your "arguments". What you are delivering (in broken English which is not 100% decipherable, no matter what you seem to think about your English being good enough for the task at hand) is a series of assumptions, half-truths, personal idiosyncrasies, and autistic tantrums, all wrapped up in Philosophy 101-level bluster about ontology, metaphysics, and a few other buzzwords you've picked up from the glossary of your Phil. 101 textbook. Then, when someone takes issue with one of your so-called arguments, or simply ignores the more incoherent ones, you turn to the chapter of your textbook on argumentative fallacies and start blubbering about those. You misunderstand and misapply them about half of the time, btw.

I'm sure your fellow students in the freshman dorm at Kreplakistan University are very impressed with your intellectual prowess. The fact that we are not does not mean that you are a tortured genius, surrounded by benighted Philistines who would hang on your every brilliant word if only we could *see* and *understand* the unsurpassed beauty of your utterances. You are not nearly as smart, as well-read, or as well-spoken as you seem to think you are.

I hope you do not think that I'm merely being an asshole. I am being an asshole, but not *merely*. I'm also trying to help you. You seem very puzzled as to why people are reacting with such hostility to you, and I hope this will help explain some of it.

You are much harder to understand than you suppose, and it is not because of the sophistication of your thought. It is the language barrier. It's not your fault that you're not a native English speaker, but your blamelessness in that regard doesn't make you any easier to understand.

You are arrogant, to the point of obnoxiousness. You seem to view yourself as some kind of savior (or at least promoter) of imageboard culture, and you lecture us about it, while it's clear that your own grasp on the history of imageboards and what's acceptable on them is tenuous at best. And, as I suggested above, nobody seems to be particularly impressed by your rather modest understanding of philosophy and rhetoric.

A thicker skin and a large dose of humility would go a long way toward improving your experience here, in a lot of ways. Nobody wants low-quality threads on /tech/, but if you're trying to persuade people that *your personal interpretation of what constitutes a good thread* is what should set the standard, you're not doing yourself any favors by the way you're engaging with people in this thread or on /tech/.


Anonymous 10/02/2017 (Mon) 21:44:23 [Preview] No. 7161 del
>>7158
>You are not nearly as smart
>Judging someones intelligence by some posts on random imageboard
Guys, bring the Stanford academics here, we have a new IQ measurement method!


Anonymous 10/03/2017 (Tue) 21:56:09 [Preview] No. 7164 del
Degeneracy threads are stupid, but only because Christians are attracted to them like dung flies to the dung heap.


odilitime Board volunteer 10/07/2017 (Sat) 00:14:07 [Preview] No. 7167 del
>>7122
I skimmed some of that thread and this one. Going to just randomly reply to some of the things I saw.

>Who rules this board?
The BO. It's not a global-run board.

>What kind of posts should be allowed?
That's up to him

>What direction this board should go
If you want "quality control" go to reddit. What sets imageboards aside is the freedom to post whatever.

I guess that's option C, it's not A.

Desktop threads have their place. It's an opportunity to see how other organize their shit, so you can improve yours. (also to brag how much money you spent). But it's the frequency that matters, I don't think it's a good thing to always have a battlestations thread on a tech board imho. Once in a while yea but you don't need a fucking general or sticky.

>>7130

Message too long. Click here to view full text.



Anonymous 10/22/2017 (Sun) 07:17:13 [Preview] No. 7258 del
>>7167
>IRC is an open standard and won't die.
I hope it does. It's not because it's open that it is secure/private. Freenode is leeching your data all the way along and you guys keep using these shit with the excuse of "it's open" for years now. Do you run your own IRC server? Do you use OTR and Tor? No? Then, stop saying bullshit.
You people just use it because it automatically turns you into a "super hacker boy" and makes you feel cool on your "riced irssi".
>Web 4.0
Wut? What are you talking about?
odili, stop already, enough.



(417.02 KB 1014x1080 lain.png)
flightplan 10/20/2017 (Fri) 13:30:48 [Preview] No. 7254 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Is someone checking the contact email?


odilitime 10/21/2017 (Sat) 22:21:16 [Preview] No. 7257 del
Yes, I try to check it as often as I can



(66.30 KB 680x510 asfsgds.jpg)
Anonymous 10/13/2017 (Fri) 11:29:55 [Preview] No. 7226 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
threads random 404
cant go to meta at /pol/tards
>>>/pol/50661
fix your site odili


Anonymous 10/14/2017 (Sat) 18:16:07 [Preview] No. 7232 del
LoL. The nigger spammer is butthurt he can't lie further about his recent attacks. This is priceless. The one time board fuckery worked in our favor. Go fuck yourself, shill.


Anonymous 10/17/2017 (Tue) 20:29:24 [Preview] No. 7249 del
While mods are at it, helping curb spam, could you please delete this CHILD PORN posted here? >>>/news/2477

Please, no child porn spam should be posted in the news section! Thank you!


Anonymous 10/18/2017 (Wed) 01:48:28 [Preview] No. 7250 del
>>7226
Could you imagine how great it would be if the entire /pol/ board 404ed instead of a measly thread?

Website is working just fine.