/news/ - News

News & Current Events

Posting mode: Reply

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images


(14.24 KB 300x100 logo.png)
Nextchan, an imageboard running Infinity Next! Anonymous 09/23/2016 (Fri) 07:32:21 [Preview] No. 442
>new imageboard
>running Infinity Next
>100% Free as in Freedom
>100% Open Source Software

https://nextchan.org/


Anonymous 09/23/2016 (Fri) 11:39:47 [Preview] No. 443 del
(10.66 MB 512x282 Infinity Next.webm)
>Infinity Next
I am really sorry to say this, but it's fucked. Josh failed and all the money was wasted. It's a broken, bloated complete spaghetti mess. It will never scale to more than 50 users and it will need a very powerful server even for that.


Anonymous 09/24/2016 (Sat) 02:36:50 [Preview] No. 445 del
fuck off shills


Anonymous 09/26/2016 (Mon) 03:18:05 [Preview] No. 447 del
>>443
well if it's open source, people can fix it gradually. right?


Anonymous 09/26/2016 (Mon) 11:26:21 [Preview] No. 450 del
>>447
You don't have much experience developing software, do you. You are entering an area of ignorance best explained by the mythical man month. Similar to the idea that if open source projects with similar goals were merged then development time would reduce and quality would improve.

Without going into detail about why, I'll say that sometimes it's just better to start from scratch. Especially when the lead developer bailed and left behind an undocumented, poorly commented, unfinished with missing commits, bloated spaghetti mess.

If it ever happens, IN needs an adult to sit down with Josh and pour over the code to fully understand what he was trying to do and where he went horribly wrong. Then rebuild what's necessary in a correct and experienced manner. And from there, provide documentation and allow others to contribute. Now, to be fair, codemonkey already attempted this, but Josh is such a gigantic arrogant sperg that codemonkey gave up. This was most likely because Josh was either embarrassed of IN or more likely he didn't want codemonkey taking credit for having fixed it and getting the internet praise for IN.

I know Josh went with AGPL, which I respect, but this project is a lost cause. It simply cannot scale and no one is going to get Josh to fix it and any sane programmer is going to take one look at that bag of dicks and say "fuck it, I'll start from scratch."

This coming from someone who donated and was very vocal about supporting Josh and IN until I finally accepted that it's over.


Anonymous 09/27/2016 (Tue) 16:27:40 [Preview] No. 453 del
in what way is it better than finalchan?


Anonymous 10/01/2016 (Sat) 10:53:16 [Preview] No. 457 del
>>447
Who the fuck wants to delve in a big PHP codebase written by the fucking PHP pro lolcow


Anonymous 10/03/2016 (Mon) 09:40:29 [Preview] No. 459 del
Fuck you guys.
Endchan has a real force of nature now.


Anonymous 10/03/2016 (Mon) 11:09:30 [Preview] No. 460 del
(221.43 KB 500x281 next.png)
(24.15 KB 779x238 statusofnext.png)
Goodbye next !


Anonymous 10/03/2016 (Mon) 13:14:35 [Preview] No. 461 del
<StephenLynx> http://pastebin.com/Te55ABQP
<theFam> magzimum lagg
<StephenLynx> I used firefox timings to separate the time used to transmit the data from the time the data started to being transmitted.
<theFam> lynxchan is not too shabby tbh fam
<StephenLynx> its next that its awful.
<StephenLynx> see how it scales.
<StephenLynx> do the math.
<theFam> laravel takes 98ms to boot
<theFam> :^)
<StephenLynx> yipdity fucking doo.
<theFam> it may scale well tho who knows
<StephenLynx> oh, OF COURSE it will.
<StephenLynx> with those BLAZING fast 5 pages per second per core.
<theFam> you can't know until we have more users
<StephenLynx> yeah, because math might break tomorrow.
<StephenLynx> who the fuck knows.
<theFam> stop being so aggressive jesus
<StephenLynx> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
<StephenLynx> No.
<StephenLynx> if you were to admit next doesn't hold a candle to lynxchan then I might get off your dick.
<theFam> StephenLynx: are you using any framework or pure nodejs request/response thing?
<theFam> StephenLynx: never
<StephenLynx> pure.
<StephenLynx> so you think that 100x more pages per second is not a big difference?
<theFam> nope

-------------------------------------------------------

Pastebin content:
Latency to nextchan:
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 200.810/201.335/202.183/0.698 ms
Average of 200ms.

Time to receive a page from nextchan:
470ms waiting, 200ms receiving.
470 - 200 = 270ms to start sending the page.

-------------------------------------------

Latency to lynxhub:
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 173.227/177.067/188.820/5.900 ms
Average of 173ms.

Time to receive a page from lynxhub:
195ms waiting, 184ms receiving.
195 - 173 = 22ms to start sending the page.


Anonymous 11/01/2016 (Tue) 09:21:02 [Preview] No. 529 del
and it's back online


Anonymous 11/01/2016 (Tue) 12:28:26 [Preview] No. 530 del
>>529
Is it though


Anonymous 11/02/2016 (Wed) 10:20:11 [Preview] No. 532 del
They should have called it 504chan.


Anonymous 01/02/2017 (Mon) 17:46:08 [Preview] No. 566 del
>>532
>hehposting in a cointel thread
The layout of recyclechan feels like reddit


Anonymous 01/02/2017 (Mon) 18:54:35 [Preview] No. 567 del
>pinging a website as benchmarking
Brazilian tier webscale there


Mmee Anonymous 03/06/2017 (Mon) 00:49:52 [Preview] No. 654 del
(131.34 KB 1600x900 image.jpeg)
OWO what's this


Anonymous 03/06/2017 (Mon) 01:42:13 [Preview] No. 655 del
>>654
I really like this post


Anonymous 03/06/2017 (Mon) 09:32:50 [Preview] No. 656 del
>>567
I think those are local instances he is running. In which case, the setup would have been useful to know.



Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply