09/14/2017 (Thu) 20:11:20
Oh please, you don't need that level of sarcasm.>Free movement of immigrants of course is 100% socialistic and will only turn universal healthcare that wasn't true socialism into being true socialism when the system breaks
Pretty much, I don't know about 100% though. Socialism, at least not the national-socialism, is about equality, and providing worst equality for everyone is better than providing good healthcare for small group of privileged rich people, i.e. nordic citizens. From non-nazi socialism viewpoint people from Nigeria are pretty much same as people from Sweden, so why former have worst conditions while latter are bathing in richness and comfort? We are aiming to humanitarian superpower, right?
It is also about destroying wrong old order of evil oppressing hierarchy. This concept isn't modern SJW thing like "old-style communists" like to think, it was same from start. Lenin, for example, wrote almost same things about Russian majority like modern left-wing ideologists write about da evil whitey. He and early commies also supported anti-christianity but rarely tried to bully other religions like Islam, just to support fighting the oppression.
It helps to remove societal relationships and trust, so it allows to create the "new man", like "new Soviet man", who doesn't have history and culture, but starts from tabula rasa state.
So, opening borders and worsening conditions of people is not really foreign thing for hardcore socialists. You just viewing this from pure economical viewpoint, but it isn't only economics that matters there.>slave trade can start to regulate themselves
Capitalists also eat kids.