/horror/ - The Occult Deception

Conspiracy, Memes, Research

Posting mode: Reply

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Drawing x size canvas

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 5

Max message length: 4096

Manage Board | Moderate Thread

Return | Catalog | Bottom

Expand All Images

(6.86 MB 1280x720 wrath of god.webm)
Webm thread Anonymous 12/25/2016 (Sun) 04:01:12 [Preview] No. 16
Webms related to the Occult deception

Anonymous 12/30/2016 (Fri) 13:57:46 [Preview] No. 158 del
(3.59 MB 1920x1080 shrine.webm)
(2.64 MB 854x480 1438240873826.webm)
(3.91 MB 1920x1080 vo.webm)
(1.36 MB 854x480 1446849461232.webm)

Anonymous 01/10/2017 (Tue) 03:39:33 Id: ec7641 [Preview] No. 359 del
(173.17 MB 540x360 chev.mp4)
not everything is solid but still a lot of good connections

Anonymous 04/07/2017 (Fri) 20:15:59 [Preview] No. 976 del
(84.01 KB 605x862 1491483825386.jpg)

how do I come across one of those logins for


Anonymous 04/08/2017 (Sat) 09:18:41 [Preview] No. 979 del
(7.98 MB 1280x720 torturechamber.webm)
It was https://secure1.scottishrite.org I remember before it changed to https://sentinelv2.scottishrite.org/Login.aspx I saw something like secure2.scottishrite.org
As far as getting in I remember someone fucking with the url to get some sort of new page. I would take the fact that they use internet explorer to guess that phishing would be the best bet. That or social engineering a temporary login because reading that page for a year or 2 most of the updates are in fact questions of how to login and receive a password. If I knew a way to do it I would have tried it this is not my expertise. However the https:secure1.scottishrite.org is the same page as https://sentinelv2.scottishrite.org/Login.aspx just updated. I am checking out the how2 pdf off of the page and that proves alone that it is what James Wright claims it is the database of all masons sorted by occupation.

But only 100 people (the supreme council) have access so I do not know how easy or harder it would make it to access.

Anonymous 06/25/2017 (Sun) 23:06:18 [Preview] No. 1212 del
I would say that the Jews don't grasp Greek Metaphysics and had mixed it with other cults. Someone's been posting a lot in /pol/'s webm thread recently that shares some info as to what the kabbalah teaches. There's a brief introduction as to what Jewish mysticism is about on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_mysticism#Notes

I had studied philosophy and 99.9% of it is no better than religion. I know enough to categorize "Christianity" into four groups: Radical Christianity, Christianism, Christology, and Churchianity. Radical Christianity is true Christianity. Christianism (not the same as the Christianism mentioned in Wikipedia) is whatever Christians say that is true Christianity, are secondary to the primary sources so there's bound to be errors and lies from the devil. Christology is an academic/secular attempt to explain the other three but those that study Christology aren't necessarily Christians and so are bound to misinterpret the bible. Churchianity/Cultural Christianity/Christendom is all the junk stuff nobody cares about of which unfortunately many self proclaimed Christians are doomed to deal with because it also infects Christology and Christianism. Radical Christianity is purely outside of Churchianity.

I can tell you that most Christians don't understand the difference between the various Greek mystery schools. Paul basically said to the Colossians in chapter 2:8 "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." However, that isn't to say there isn't any "philosophy" of Christianity. The bible is full of such confusing examples. There's a form of Christian Rationalism that tries to explain stuff like the Trinity without making statements that contradict the bible. Modal trinity and Dynamic trinity concepts are considered heretical. https://youtube.com/watch?v=PSBgvWr7dcY [Embed] Also, the very crux of Radical Christianity rests upon the belief that there isn't a grand unified field theory and if there were, it will never be knowable. The nonheretodox/"orthodox" (not referring to the Orthodox Christian Churches) form of the Christian Trinity is the "proof" against all forms of vain philosophy of man (from the perspective of Christians). Pythagorean, Platonic, and Neoplatonic philosophy is Greek Monism and again, the Jews don't grasp it, Paul never spoken against them, but there's some similarities here and there between them, but ultimately they're grouped with "philosophy and vain deceit". The "biblical" form of the Christian Trinity is not explicitly described systematically in the bible, but rather described in bits and pieces here and there in the bible. Trying to form a systematic understanding of the bible for one self by themselves is a part of Radical Christianity. Relying on the words of other Christians as to what they claim to be what's in the bible is Christianism, especially if it's not justified in the primary source text. Relying on any external non Christian sources is Christology. Churchianity is part Christianism and Christology mixed with bullshit that gets you to pay up the most money in a false, unbiblical form of charity, reducing church service into a show in front of a live audience and superficiality. (cont)

Anonymous 06/25/2017 (Sun) 23:06:32 [Preview] No. 1213 del
The Saducees didn't believe that there was a "soul", they believed in the no soul doctrine of which Aristotelian Atomists/Materialists also doesn't believe in. If you only read the Old Testament, the "breath of life" returns to God while their body returns to adamah/ground. Paul was the first to formulate the tripartite being concept of the body-mind-spirit tri-unity of man (AKA trichotomy of man) in the Christian bible but he was not the first to form a "Trinity". Some people suspect that he ripped it off of Plato just as (((Philo of Alexandria))) tried to incorporate Platonic thought into Rabbinic Misnhic Judaism but nobody knows for certain. The modern form of the Trinity is the one explained by St. Augustine which the Orthodox Churches despise him for his concept of the filioque. Anyways, the concept of the Trinity of the Godhead was in the Old Testament here and there as well as the New Testament, but to claim that there's a trichotomy of man to be derived from the Old Testament exclusively is a harder claim to make unless you think that a soul means the synthesis between the flesh and the spirit based off of Genesis 2:7. From the perspective of the Greek Monists, the Christians secularized Monistic Metaphysics while from the perspective of the Christians, Pythagoras and Plato might had read the first few chapters of the book of Genesis but didn't cared about whatever promises God made to "his people" and so doesn't care about Jesus Christ.

Anonymous 06/25/2017 (Sun) 23:23:24 [Preview] No. 1214 del
Of course Jesus Christ didn't exist when Pythagoras and Plato was alive, but I meant that they didn't care about a savior archetypal that was prophesied in the Old Testament to be considered by any stretch of the imagination to be a prerequisite for "salvation" through the work and sacrifice of someone else. An external objective salvation didn't make sense to them in comparison to internal salvation through subjective enlightenment and union between your own spirit and the Nous and the Monad which the Nous and the Monad are coprinciples of each other just as one can't separate a mind behind a principle and a principle behind a mind. This concept is also known as the aoristos dyad, which doesn't exist in Christianity, neither does Henosis. The Greeks didn't believe that Theoria needed a mediator between them and the divine principle. The Orthodox Church's concept of Theoria is not biblical, they downplay the crucifixion of Jesus Christ dying for our sins to be something necessary and instead, unnecessary, yet all the while trying to gain salvation through their own external works of faith when salvation comes before faith itself.

Anonymous 06/26/2017 (Mon) 02:17:25 [Preview] No. 1215 del

Theoria is Theurgy, the synthesis of the Nous and one's own consciousness. Theosis is not Theurgy though at first glance is mistaken for it.

Anonymous 10/16/2017 (Mon) 20:07:36 [Preview] No. 1401 del
The Occult Philosophy by Michael A Hoffman -- full 1hr speech Anaheim 1987


Anonymous 10/16/2017 (Mon) 20:11:52 [Preview] No. 1402 del
Hoffman is one of the most insightful modern authors on the subject, as well as exposing the nature of Talmudism and "Christian" Zionism.

>....the after-the-fact revelations are as much a part of the assassination plot as the murder and its initial cover-up. It's a deliberate psychological process they're taking us through, a psychodrama of enormous scale, though not really different from the principle behind the anonymous circulation of the Rosicrucian manifestos of the I7th century, with their mocking hints of identity.

>One: the ritual murders are successfully accomplished. The principals get-away, the scapegoat conveniently takes the blame. Two: later we learn the truth but no one is prosecuted. We are mocked, disoriented and demoralized. Occult prestige and potency is heightened.

>This is what simplistic researchers miss: the function of macabre arrogance thumbing its nose at us while we do nothing except spread the tale of their immunity and invincibility further. That is the game plan operant here.

- Michael A. Hoffman II Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 88-89

Anonymous 11/09/2017 (Thu) 03:22:41 [Preview] No. 1420 del
Conspiracy of Silence, pedo sex ring exposure documentary (1994)

My browser crashes when trying to upload the 129mb webm of this so I'll just drop the youtube link instead

https://youtube.com/watch?v=vBSIDQt5Dwc [Embed]

good video, thanks for making these

Anonymous 04/29/2018 (Sun) 01:06:33 [Preview] No.1773 del
Is there anyone can help reupload these webms?

Anonymous 04/29/2018 (Sun) 01:37:42 [Preview] No.1774 del
almost 3 hours of the oc I made. Thats a lot I can find the other videos

Anonymous 04/29/2018 (Sun) 01:38:04 [Preview] No.1775 del
I have a few of those but right now endchan will display them as null files even if reuploaded. They need to either be changed or dead files need to be deleted from endchan so they can be reuploaded properly.

Anonymous 04/29/2018 (Sun) 01:53:41 [Preview] No.1776 del
I might delete this thread because I put almost all of it in https://dbr.ee/p8Kx and that I can upload in a new thread along with the documentaries. I still have some of them encoded to webm.

Anonymous 04/29/2018 (Sun) 08:15:09 [Preview] No.1777 del
Just because you delete the thread doesn't mean the broken files are gone from the server.

Anonymous 04/30/2018 (Mon) 23:47:06 [Preview] No.1778 del
(300.83 MB 666x420 wems.webm)

Anonymous 04/30/2018 (Mon) 23:49:35 [Preview] No.1779 del
I wanna cut that down to around 30 minutes.

Anonymous 05/01/2018 (Tue) 01:53:13 [Preview] No.1780 del
Deleted the broken webm link posts and checked the scrub option hopefully it will allow them to be posted again. If not then just convert them to mp4,

Anonymous 05/02/2018 (Wed) 09:13:15 [Preview] No.1782 del
Having watched it the whole way through it actually does convey a masonic conspiracy so I will focus on making more content and maybe making a short version with redpill parts and no filler as a "previously on webms" montage. But I hated it all in one video for the first day or 2 figuring it would be saturated with the worst of it which is going off into memes. It fits better than I thought it did skipping around the video

but now is not the time to feel good I need to make more we all need to make more oc get retards to ask more questions about their worldview in threads offsite to redpill.

or else they are gonna try and take down the world with the guillotines depopulation. I dont want to do this I have to. I should start mirroring anywhere I can and want to hear what people felt convinced by because I want to help make something as an argument against the cult that can not be debunked.

Anonymous 05/02/2018 (Wed) 09:34:52 [Preview] No.1783 del
(16.90 MB 1280x720 l.mp4)
Well That must mean i have to re-encode it because of the broken link mess. here we go

Anonymous 05/02/2018 (Wed) 10:09:49 [Preview] No.1784 del

Top | Return | Catalog | Post a reply