/atheism/ - atheism

atheism

Boards | Catalog | Bottom

Check to confirm you're not a robot
Email
Subject
Comment
Password
Drawing x size canvas
File(s)

Remember to follow the rules

Max file size: 350.00 MB

Max files: 1

Max message length: 4096


The DAWKINS code Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 22:10:01 [Preview] No. 347 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Christcucks are stupid (noun). Could I conjugate stupendous (adjective) into a noun when I want sound like I'm mocking them, but then go back on it and point at the dictionary/etymology and call them stupid for not understanding what I meant if I land in bad politics?

What other tricky words can you think of to mock our enemies?


Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 22:16:44 [Preview] No. 348 del
>>347
But of course it's stupendousness. I just misremembered not an ordinary ignoramus under a under a misapprhension or attempting to sound more intelligent than I am. Haha, you believed that. I was just lying. It was all a test to see if you know. I told you how to conjugate it because I'm a prodigy and happen to be magnanimous.


Anonymous 07/31/2017 (Mon) 23:26:35 [Preview] No. 558 del
Dawkins is again involved in the free speech debate against the American regressive left.
https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/richard-dawkins-is-dragged-into-americas-tedious-free-speech-war/


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 00:48:49 [Preview] No. 559 del
>>347
>What other tricky words can you think of to mock our enemies?
...

...the 'adverb' seem pretty tricky.


Anonymous 08/01/2017 (Tue) 21:52:03 [Preview] No. 561 del
https://mobile.twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/892002514597552128
Who do you prefer? Dawkins tweet that he doesn't seek controversy but clarity, or Hitchens for seeking controversy for It's own sake and encouraging you to be a contrarian? That does make Hitchens sound like an attention who're, doesn't it? As a media pundit he needed controversy to keep an audience. Dawkins is foremost a sc8entist, and atheism publications just became his second job so he has never needed it.

In the absence of information I prefer the default skepticism and individualism of Hitchens, and the sheer stubbornness to going with the flow. Hitchens builds a good habit that prevents becoming a Lemming, while with Dawkins' approach you could slip up and become too complacent.



(35.76 KB 367x539 a38.jpg)
If you could put the worst atheists in a fighting pit Anonymous 08/04/2017 (Fri) 04:32:26 [Preview] No. 567 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Who would you want to see fight? Steve Shoves or PZ Meyers? PZ Meyers knows about evolution and has a primitive mind which might give him an edge in a fist fight, but Steve Shives might roll onto his back piss himdelf, and whine like a retarded puppy and make Meyers feel too sorry for him to attack. Then Steve Shives would strike him when his back was turned, and keep beating him when he was on the ground until long after he was already dead. But I don't know, if Steve Shoves loses the gamble thr slapfest might end in a draw since they're both effeminine cuckolds.


Anonymous 08/04/2017 (Fri) 08:20:01 [Preview] No. 569 del
(130.04 KB 610x343 cherish this.jpg)
>>567
He always looks so innocent...
...I want to protect his smile.



(620.75 KB 440x247 1463838937611.gif)
Anonymous 07/24/2017 (Mon) 17:55:27 [Preview] No. 551 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Those stupid Christians. Most of them don't understand their own religion, they don't even read the Bible. Christianity ruins everything for not reading the Bible. If it was up to us atheists, learning the bible would be mandatary, and it would be translated to even more languages, so Christians would know that the bible and faith gives people the excuse to do all the horrible things they wouldn't otherwise do, like extortion of protection money and brainwashing in schools. We could tell everybody not to do it!


Anonymous 07/25/2017 (Tue) 10:16:19 [Preview] No. 552 del
I agree, all Christians should read the bible. Maybe I should start giving them away as gifts to Christians. Atheist kids should definitely read it, and not just bible stories.


Anonymous 07/26/2017 (Wed) 17:07:03 [Preview] No. 553 del
Meanwhile churches are being used to block the law and give assylum to illegals.
https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/from-church-sanctuary-colorado-woman-defies-ice


Anonymous 07/26/2017 (Wed) 17:45:20 [Preview] No. 554 del
(10.65 KB 180x213 180px.jpg)
>>553
You can tell they've never read a bible. Activism like this wouldn't happen in a secular society, where bible is well understood and it doesn't give people the excuse to pull this shit against the legitimate force of the law.



Anonymous 07/12/2017 (Wed) 23:22:31 [Preview] No. 536 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
How could we get more people on this board?
1 post omitted.


Anonymous 07/13/2017 (Thu) 19:34:23 [Preview] No. 538 del
>>537
I'm not a slave who needs a master to be happy. You can be my slave and I will be your lord and master.


Anonymous 07/14/2017 (Fri) 01:17:06 [Preview] No. 539 del
(629.77 KB 1280x1920 P7nGLxf.jpg)
>>538
Atheists, by definition, do not have a set of "objective" moral beliefs. Some atheists might think slavery is okay, some might not. I run all of my thoughts and decisions through my dick.


Anonymous 07/15/2017 (Sat) 14:57:04 [Preview] No. 541 del
>>539
Atheists believe that God is not only knowable but specifically theistic, which puts them neatly into the category of the most buttfuck nowhere bydlo fundamentalists. They believe in a God-shaped hole surrounded by all the exact same things an existing God would be surrounded by in an actual sand religion. If they'd been told that JFK brought them their christmas presents, they would have stopped believing in JFK.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 08:47:38 [Preview] No. 542 del
>>541
Naw, atheists don't believe in much of anything, they just don't believe in any gods. That impression you have is only because atheists talk about Christian definitions rejecting Christianity, but we would readily reject other forms of theism.


Anonymous 07/16/2017 (Sun) 15:37:44 [Preview] No. 543 del
(19.28 KB 222x229 dawking.jpg)
>>542
>other forms of theism
Christianity is just the belief in Jesus Christ, not a form of theism :^)

Christians talk about the secular definitions of theism, but would readily reject other forms of marxist thought control dogma. :^):^)



(31.39 MB 1920x1080 20170711_021626.mp4)
Female t.v. evangelist Anonymous 07/11/2017 (Tue) 09:22:53 [Preview] No. 535 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
I love how she's a FEMALE priest rambling late at night which simply shouldn't be. Bitch needs to read her bible and stop telling any men what to think, believe or do.



Christian marriage defined! Anonymous 07/09/2017 (Sun) 00:09:42 [Preview] No. 533 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
Christian marriage is basically a threesome where one person is imaginary.

and he watches....every time you fuck your wife...in every position...every way....it's so fucking creepy.

(Unlike sweet holy yuri which is unchristian and unholy to them.)



(28.94 KB 225x225 image.jpeg)
Autistic rant on religion Anonymous 04/23/2017 (Sun) 23:53:48 [Preview] No. 368 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
>feel superior to untold millions of people as an Atheist
>still retarded
It doesn't take a genius to figure out the bible is flawed, but nobody will ever be able to take away that it was written down by monks, who are human, and therefore fallible. Then it was translated a million times, by other fallible hands. The theory most Christians with a brain adhere to seems to be that of an omnipotent God that is in everything and everyone and a heaven in what is basically another dimension. Both cannot be disproved. Also, the New Testament is actually a pretty decent guide on how to be a good guy. Don't get into poetry much, so I ignored the Psalms and couldn't get through the quran, but all in all, religious literature is definitely worth reading. The crazy shit the Hindus write is definitely worth it, they have so many Gods that it's basically a never-ending epic about all the fucked up things their Gods get up to. It always amazes me how people can identify as atheist when agnostic is a much easier choice, it's easier to digest for believers and leaves room for compromise. Maybe it has to do with rebelling against an occasionally somewhat forceful religious societies in the US, but atheists seem to be everywhere atm, and I just don't get it. Not to say that a lot of believers, especially the ones that the word of God is meant to be taken literally, apart from a few key components (7 deadly sins, 10 commandments), aren't just as stupid or worse.

tl;dr literally every Atheist ignores common scientific practice and ignores good books
1 post and 1 image omitted.


Anonymous 04/24/2017 (Mon) 04:59:46 [Preview] No. 406 del
I'm an atheist to the Christian god, I'm agnostic to Indra, and I'm a believer in the Shinto penis gods. Any god that will slap feminists who deserted us and tells them we have superior IQ SCORES is alright in my book and I won't check for confirmation bias.


Anonymous 04/24/2017 (Mon) 05:17:57 [Preview] No. 407 del
>>398
I just enjoy them as works of historical fiction. No sense dismissing them altogether. Might as well dismiss the Star Wars trilogy because of Jedi being a legitimate (parody) religion, and not because they are shitty movies

>>406
Penis God is best God.


Anonymous 04/24/2017 (Mon) 05:36:21 [Preview] No. 408 del
Most atheists just don't want to deal with absolute/objective truth/reality. They can't into moral relativism unless they deny the existence of God.

Lefties want to say/believe things like
>(you)'re on the wrong side of history
>morality is whatever the mob decides
but people who believe in a religion will never accept these.

I think these are mainly the "no religion" people the atheists claim when they want to pretend atheism is large and growing in society.


Anonymous 04/24/2017 (Mon) 22:08:37 [Preview] No. 410 del


Anonymous 07/03/2017 (Mon) 13:26:16 [Preview] No. 530 del
>>368
>how people can identify as atheist when agnostic is a much easier choice, it's easier to digest for believers and leaves room for compromise

You need to understand that "theism" is a jew conspiracy to subvert christians by pandering to normie edgelord autists' know-it-all complex. "Atheist" conversely is the only true population that genuinely believe in theism as it is dictated to them with no room for question, and it gets applied as a strawman representing mostly just Christianity as an umbrella term. Of course it can be applied to say, islam, but this generally hasn't been the case and the more it does the less abrasive it will be to christians as it starts failing to strawman christians specifically.

Fun fact, gnosticism went through the exact same shit in what I believe was around the 3rd century or so. Nowadays it basically means "I don't have conclusive, blind faith that God is mean to me", to which Christianity always has had the typical answer be "well duh, me neither".



Anonymous 04/15/2017 (Sat) 00:32:12 [Preview] No. 338 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
If you see an elephant crushing a mouse beneath its foot, and loudly proclaim "I am neutral!", do not expect the mouse to appreciate your neutrality.

This is doubly true if you decide to take time out of your "neutral" day to criticize that mean, hateful mouse for being so "intolerant" of that poor innocent elephant's culture.

Pretending that bigotry and opposition to bigotry are equivalent does not make you "enlightened". It just makes you a bigot.
4 posts and 2 images omitted.


Anonymous 04/17/2017 (Mon) 23:23:44 [Preview] No. 344 del
>>343
I'm for censorship in the name of social justice and liberty.


Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 02:47:18 [Preview] No. 345 del
When I feel lost I stop to ask muself...what would Dawkins do?
>>344


Anonymous 04/18/2017 (Tue) 04:38:14 [Preview] No. 346 del
>>342
but isnt islam good? why not follow the ways of islam?


Anonymous 07/03/2017 (Mon) 13:06:31 [Preview] No. 529 del
(26.20 KB 420x590 brun-brun.jpg)
Did you know? Religion has held back progress for centuries. In countless occasions groups have formed to oppose science because they have an interest in heaven, but never once have groups formed to oppose science because they had an interest in worldly benefit. This is because god-faith is necessary for it and material goods are entirely incidental.



Always....always... Anonymous 06/26/2017 (Mon) 23:00:32 [Preview] No. 526 [Reply] [Last 50 Posts]
This is a good depiction of what Christians believe life will be like according to Revelation.

Imagine being unable to do anything but face Gary Stu-sama and worship his face forever and ever. And according to revelation there will be an annoying voice that keeps singing the same words over and over for all of eternity.

You will lose your free will and be nothing more than a puppet. Insects will fly into your mouth if God desires it and you'll look like a drooling fool for all of eternity.

Always...
Always...


Anonymous 06/30/2017 (Fri) 16:01:28 [Preview] No. 528 del
>>526
They also think we are sending ourselves to hell, not the mafia/Gestapo boss in the sky.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=smPEplUcPgY